SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Adams, P. E., & Krockover, G. H. (1997). Beginning science teacher cognition and its origins in the preservice secondary science teacher program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 633653.
  • Barton, A. C., & Tobin, K. (2001). Preface: Urban science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 843846.
  • Bavelas, J. B., Chovil, N., Coates, L., & Roe, L. (1995). Gestures specialized for dialogue. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 394405.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1992). The practice of reflexive sociology (The Paris workshop). In P.Bourdieu & L. J. D.Wacquant (Eds.), An invitation to reflexive sociology( pp. 216260). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Clarke, J., Hall, S., Jefferson, T., & Roberts, B. (1976). Subcultures, cultures and class. In S.Hall & T.Jefferson (Eds.), Resistance through rituals: Youth subcultures in post-war Britain( pp. 969). London: Hutchinson.
  • Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: The Free Press.
  • Erickson, G. L., & MacKinnon, A. (1991). Seeing classrooms in new ways: On becoming a science teacher. In D.Schön (Ed.), The reflective turn: Case studies in and on educational practice( pp. 1536). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Giddens, A. (1998). Sociology (3rd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 14891522.
  • Goodwin, C., Goodwin, M. H., & Yaeger-Dror, M. (2002). Multi-modality in girls' game disputes. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 16211649.
  • Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Heath, C. (1986). Body movement and speech in medical interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Holzkamp, K. (1991). Societal and individual life processes. In C. W.Tolman & W.Maiers (Eds.), Critical psychology: Contributions to an historical science of the subject( pp. 5064). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lave, J. (1993). The practice of learning. In S.Chaiklin & J.Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context( pp. 332). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
  • Roth, W.-M. (1998). Science teaching as knowledgeability: A case study of knowing and learning during coteaching. Science Education, 82, 357377.
  • Roth, W.-M. (2002). Being and becoming in the classroom. Westport, CT: Ablex.
  • Roth, W.-M. (2004). Organizational mediation of urban science. In K.Tobin, R.Elmesky, & G.Seiler (Eds.), Maximizing the transformative potential of science education: Learning from research in inner city high schools( pp. 77104). New York: Greenwood.
  • Roth, W.-M. (in press). Becoming like the other. In W.-M.Roth & K.Tobin (Eds.), New directions in science teacher education: Learning to teach through collaborative activities. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Roth, W.-M., Lawless, D., & Masciotra, D. (2001). Spielraum and teaching. Curriculum Inquiry, 31, 183207.
  • Roth, W.-M., McGinn, M. K., Woszczyna, C., & Boutonné, S. (1999). Differential participation during science conversations: The interaction of focal artifacts, social configuration, and physical arrangements. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 293347.
  • Roth, W.-M., & Tobin, K. (2002). At the elbow of another: Learning to teach by coteaching. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Roth, W.-M., Tobin, K., Carambo, C., & Dalland, C. (2004). Coteaching: Creating resources for learning and learning to teach chemistry in urban high schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(9).
  • Roth, W.-M., Tobin, K., Elmesky, R., Carambo, C., Beers, J., & McKnight, Y. (2004). Re/making identities in the praxis of urban schooling: A cultural historical perspective. Mind, Culture, & Activity, 11, 4869.
  • Roth, W.-M., Tobin, K., Zimmermann, A., Bryant, N., & Davis, C. (2002). Lessons on/from the dihybrid cross: An activity theoretical study of learning in coteaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 253282.
  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50, 697735.
  • Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Sewell, W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 129.
  • Sewell, W. H. (1999). The concept(s) of culture. In V. E.Bonnell & L.Hunt (Eds.), Beyond the cultural turn: New directions in the study of society and culture( pp. 3561). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 122.
  • ten Have, P. (1999). Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide. London: Sage.
  • Tobin, K. (in press). Exchanging the baton: Exploring the co in coteaching. In W.-M.Roth & K.Tobin (Eds.), New directions in science teacher education: Learning to teach through collaborative activities. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Tobin, K., & Roth, W.-M. (in press). Coteaching/cogenerative dialoguing in an urban science teacher preparation program. In W.-M.Roth & K.Tobin (Eds.), New directions in science teacher education: Learning to teach through collaborative activities. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Tobin, K., Zurbano, R., Ford, A., & Carambo, C. (2003). Learning to teach through coteaching and cogenerative dialogue. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 10(2), 5173.
  • Wassell, B (2004). More than overwhelmed: How a first-year teacher in an urban high school employs agency to build solidarity in the presence of structural changes. Unpublished dissertation. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.