SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • AAAS. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000a). Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665701.
  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000b). The influence of history of science courses on students' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 10571095.
  • Aikenhead, G. S., Fleming, R. W., & Ryan, A. G. (1987). High-school graduates' beliefs about science-technology-society, I. Methods and issues in monitoring student views. Science Education, 71(2), 145161.
  • Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.
  • Bell, P., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 797817.
  • Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 2132.
  • Carey, S., Evans, R., Honda, M., Jay, E., & Unger, C. (1989). “An experiment is when you try it and see if it work”: A study of grade 7 students' understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 514529.
  • Carey, S., & Smith, C. (1993). On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 28(3), 235251.
  • Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1998). An empirical test of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 623654.
  • Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B., A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175218.
  • Cooley, W., & Klopfer, L. (1963). The evaluation of specific educational innovations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1(1), 7380.
  • deVries, E., Lund, K., & Baker, M. (2002). Computer-mediated epistemic dialogue: Explanation and argumentation as vehicles for understanding scientific notions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 63103.
  • Dewey, J. (1900/1990). The school and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287312.
  • Dunbar, K. (1993). Concept discovery in a scientific domain. Cognitive Science, 17, 397434.
  • Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their development. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38, 3972.
  • Enyedy, N. (2003). Knowledge construction and collective practice: At the intersection of learning, talk, and social configurations in a computer-mediated mathematics classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 361407.
  • Goldman, S. R., Duschl, R. A., Ellenbogen, K., Williams, S. M., & Tzou, C. (2003). Science inquiry in a digital world: Possibilities for making thinking visible. In V.Oostendorp (Ed.), Cognition in a digital world( pp. 253281). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E., & Smith, C. L. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 799822.
  • Hammer, D. (1994). Epistemological beliefs in introductory physics. Cognition and Instruction, 12(2), 151183.
  • Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In B. K.Hofer & P. R.Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing( pp. 169190). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88140.
  • Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (Eds.). (2002). Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hogan, K. (2000). Exploring a process view of students' knowledge about the nature of science. Science Education, 84(1), 5170.
  • Jackson, S. L., Stratford, S. J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1994). Making dynamic modeling accessible to precollege science students. Interactive Learning Environments, 4(3), 233257.
  • Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodríguez, A. B., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). “Doing the lesso” or “doing scienc”: Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84, 757792.
  • Kelly, G. J., Chen, C., & Crawford, T. (1998). Methodological considerations for studying science-in-the-making in educational settings. Research in Science Education, 28(1), 2349.
  • Kelly, G. J., Druker, S., & Chen, C. (1998). Students' reasoning about electricity: Combining performance assessments with argumentation analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 20(7), 849871.
  • Kelly, G. J., & Duschl, R. A. (2002). Toward a research agenda for epistemological studies in science education, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of NARST 2002, New Orleans, LA.
  • Kelly, G. J., & Takao, A. (2002). Epistemic levels in argument: An analysis of university oceanography students' use of evidence in writing. Science Education, 86, 314342.
  • Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551578.
  • Kimball, M. E. (1967-1968). Understanding the nature of science: A comparison of scientists and science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 5, 110120.
  • King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Kitcher, P. (1991). Persuasion. In M.Pera & W. R.Shea (Eds.), Persuading science: The art of scientific rhetoric( pp. 327). Canton, MA: Science History Publications.
  • Klahr, D., Dunbar, K., & Fay, A. L. (1990). Designing good experiments to test bad hypotheses. In J.Shrager & P.Langley (Eds.), Computational models of scientific discovery and theory formation( pp. 355401). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
  • Kolstø, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85, 291310.
  • Koslowski, B. (1996). Theory and evidence: The development of scientific reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., & Fredricks, J. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3&4), 313350.
  • Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77(3), 319337.
  • Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., & O'Loughlin, M. (1988). The development of scientific thinking skills. San Diego, CA: Academic.
  • Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15, 309328.
  • Leach, J., Driver, R., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1997). A study of progression in learning about ‘the nature of science’: Issues of conceptualisation and methodology. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 147166.
  • Leach, J., Millar, R., Ryder, J., & Séré, M.-G. (2000). Epistemological understanding in science learning: The consistency of representations across contexts. Learning and Instruction, 10, 497527.
  • Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331359.
  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497521.
  • Lederman, N. G., & O'Malley, M. (1990). Students' perceptions of tentativeness in science: Development, use, and sources of change. Science Education, 74(2), 225239.
  • Lederman, N. G., Wade, P. D., & Bell, R. L. (1998). Assessing the nature of science: What is the nature of our assessments?Science & Education, 7, 595615.
  • Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Linn, M. C., & Songer, N. B. (1993). How do students make sense of science?Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39(1), 4773.
  • Mackay, L. D. (1971). Development of understanding about the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 8(1), 5766.
  • Mayr, E. (1988). Toward a new philosophy of biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • McComas, W. F. (1996). Ten myths of science: Reexamining what we think we know about the nature of science. School Science and Mathematics, 96, 1016.
  • McComas, W. F., & Olson, J. K. (1998). The nature of science in international science education standards documents. In W. F.McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies( pp. 4152). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Meichtry, Y. J. (1992). Influencing student understanding of the nature of science: Data from a case of curriculum development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 389407.
  • NRC. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • NRC. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. A. (2003). What “ideas-about-scienc” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692720.
  • Penner, D., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1998). From physical models to biomechanics: A design-based modeling approach. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3&4), 429449.
  • Perry, W. G., Jr. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Reif, F., & Larkin, J. H. (1991). Cognition in scientific and everyday domains: Comparison and learning implications. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 733760.
  • Reiser, B. J., Tabak, I., Sandoval, W. A., Smith, B. K., Steinmuller, F., & Leone, A. J. (2001). BGuILE: Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms. In S. M.Carver & D.Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress( pp. 263305). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Conant, F. R. (1992). Appropriating scientific discourse: Findings from language minority classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(1), 6194.
  • Roth, W.-M., & Désautels, J. (Eds.). (2002). Science education as/for sociopolitical action. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Roth, W.-M., & Roychoudhury, A. (1994). Physics students' epistemologies and views about knowing and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(1), 530.
  • Rubba, P., & Andersen, H. (1978). Development of an instrument to assess secondary students' understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge. Science Education, 62(4), 449458.
  • Rudolph, J. L. (2002). Scientists in the classroom: The cold war reconstruction of American science education. New York: Palgrave.
  • Rutherford, F. J., & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: AAAS.
  • Ryan, A. G., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1992). Students' preconceptions about the epistemology of science. Science Education, 76(6), 559580.
  • Sandoval, W. A. (2003). Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students' scientific explanations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 551.
  • Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. A. (2005). The quality of students' use of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 2355.
  • Sandoval, W. A., & Morrison, K. (2003). High school students' ideas about theories and theory change after a biological inquiry unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(4), 369392.
  • Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (2004). Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic supports for science inquiry. Science Education, 88, 345372.
  • Schauble, L., Glaser, R., Duschl, R. A., Schulze, S., & John, J. (1995). Students' understanding of the objectives and procedures of experimentation in the science classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 131166.
  • Schommer, M., Calvert, C., Gariglietti, G., & Bajaj, A. (1997). The development of epistemological beliefs among secondary students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 3740.
  • Schommer, M., Crouse, A., & Rhodes, N. (1992). Epistemological beliefs and mathematical text comprehension: Believing it is simple does not make it so. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 435443.
  • Schwab, J. J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In J. J.Schwab & P.Brandwein (Eds.), The teaching of science( pp. 3103). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Smith, C. L., Maclin, D., Houghton, C., & Hennessey, M. G. (2000). Sixth-grade students' epistemologies of science: The impact of school science experiences on epistemological development. Cognition & Instruction, 18(3), 349422.
  • Sodian, B., Zaitchik, D., & Carey, S. (1991). Young children's differentiation of hypothetical beliefs from evidence. Child Development, 62, 753766.
  • Solomon, J., Duveen, J., & Scott, L. (1994). Pupils' images of scientific epistemology. International Journal of Science Education, 16(3), 361373.
  • Solomon, J., Scott, L., & Duveen, J. (1996). Large-scale exploration of pupils' understanding of the nature of science3. Science Education, 80(5), 493508.
  • Songer, N. B., & Linn, M. C. (1991). How do students' views of science influence knowledge integration?Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 761784.
  • Stewart, J., Hafner, R., Johnson, S., & Finkel, E. (1992). Science as model building: Computers and high-school genetics. Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 317336.
  • Tobin, K., Tippins, D. J., & Hook, K. S. (1995). Students' beliefs about epistemology, science, and classroom learning: A question of fit. In S. M.Glynn & R.Duit (Eds.), Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice( pp. 85110). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Toth, E. E., Suthers, D. D., & Lesgold, A. (2002). “Mapping to kno”: The effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry. Science Education, 86, 264286.
  • Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tschirgi, J. E. (1980). Sensible reasoning: A hypothesis about hypotheses. Child Development, 51, 110.
  • Warren, B., & Rosebery, A. S. (1996). “This question is just too, too easy!” Students' perspectives on accountability in science. In L.Schauble & R.Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education( pp. 97125). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 129140.
  • White, B. Y. (1993). ThinkerTools: Causal models, conceptual change, and science education. Cognition and Instruction, 10(1), 1100.
  • White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3118.
  • Windschitl, M., & Andre, T. (1998). Using computer simulations to enhance conceptual change: The roles of constructivist instruction and student epistemological beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(2), 145160.
  • Zimmerman, C. (2000). The development of scientific reasoning skills. Developmental Review, 20, 99149.