SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Agar, M. (1994). Language shock: Understanding the culture of conversation. New York: Morrow.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Anderson, C. W., Holland, J. D., & Palinscar, A. S. (1997). Canonical and sociocultural approaches to research and reform in science education: The story of Juan and his group. The Elementary School Journal, 97, 359383.
  • Ballenger, C. (1997). Social identities, moral narratives, and scientific argumentation: Science talk in a bilingual classroom. Language and Education, 11, 113.
  • Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Brickhouse, N. (1994). Bringing in the outsiders: Reshaping the sciences of the future. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26(4), 401416.
  • Brickhouse, N. W., & Potter, J. T. (2001). Young women's scientific identity formation in an urban context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 965980.
  • Brown, B. (2004). Discursive identity: Assimilation into the culture of science classroom and its implications for minority students [electronic version]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Retrieved September 2004, from http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome3187
  • DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 582601.
  • Eisenhart, M., Finkel, E., & Marion, S. F. (1996). Creating the conditions for scientific literacy: A re-examination. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 261295.
  • Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
  • Fishman, J. (1989). Language, ethnicity, and racism. In J.Fishman (Ed.), Language and ethnicity in minority sociolinguistic perspective (pp. 922). Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters, Ltd.
  • Gee, J. (1999a). The narrativization of experience in the oral style. In C.Mitchell & K.Weiler (Eds.), Reviewing literacy: Culture and the discourse of the other (pp. 77101). Westport, CN: Bergin & Garvin.
  • Gee, J. (1999b). What is literacy? In C.Mitchell & K.Weiler (Eds.), Reviewing literacy: Culture and the discourse of the other (pp. 312) Westport, CN: Bergin & Garvin.
  • Gee, J. P. (2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99125.
  • Germann, P., & Aram, R. (1996). Student performances on the science processes of recording data, analyzing data, drawing conclusions, and providing evidence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 773798.
  • Gilbert, A., & Yerrick, R. (2001). Same school, separate worlds: A sociocultural study of identity, resistance, and negotiation in a rural, lower track science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 574598.
  • Greeno, J. (1997). On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 517.
  • Gumperz, J. J. (Ed.). (1982). Language and social identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations of sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
  • Jackson, D., Edwards, B., & Berger, C. (1993). Teaching the design and interpretation of graphs through computer-aided graphical data analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 483501.
  • Kelly, G. J. (2004). Discourse in science classrooms. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Kelly, G. J., & Brown, C. M. (2003). Communicative demands of learning science through technological design: Third grade students' construction of solar energy devices. Linguistics & Education, 13, 483532.
  • Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Lave, J. (1993). The practice of learning. In S.Chaiklin & J.Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice (pp. 334). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lee, O., & Fradd, S. (1998). Science for all, including students from non-English-language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 27(4), 1221.
  • Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Lemke, J. (1997). Cognition, context, and learning. In D.Kirschner & J.Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition (pp. 3756). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Lemke, J. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(4), 273290.
  • Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 296316.
  • Malcolm, I. (1989). Invisible culture in the classroom: Minority pupils and the principle of adaptation. In R.Garcia, & R.Otheguy (Eds.), English across cultures and cultures across English: A reader in cross-cultural communication. (Contributions to the Sociology of language, 53) (pp. 117136). New York: Mouton.
  • Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 551558.
  • Moje, E. (1995). Talking about science: An interpretation of the effects of teacher talk in a high school science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 349371.
  • Nasir, N. S., & Saxe, G. B. (2003). Ethnic and academic identities: A cultural practice perspective on emerging tensions and their management in the lives of minority students. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 1418.
  • National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
  • Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87, 224240.
  • Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (1991). How college affects students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Rosebery, A., Warren, B., & Conant, F. (1992). Appropriating scientific discourse: Findings from language minority classrooms. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 2(1), 6194.
  • Roth, W. M., & Lee, S. (2002). Scientific literacy as collective praxis. Public Understanding of Science, 11, 124.
  • Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A. S., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 529552.
  • Warren, B., Rosebery, A., & Conant, F. (1994). Discourse and social practice: Learning science in language minority classrooms. In D.Spencer (Ed.), Adult biliteracy in the United States (pp. 191210). McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems Co., Inc.
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Williams, S. (1991). Classroom use of African-American language: Educational tool or social weapon? In C. E.Sleeter (Ed.), Empowerment through multicultural education (pp. 199215) New York: SUNY Press.
  • Wortham, S. (2003a). Accomplishing identity in participant-denoting discourse. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 13, 122.
  • Wortham, S. (2003b). Curriculum as a resource for the development of social identity. Sociology of Education, 76, 229247.
  • Wortham, S. (2004). From good student to outcast: The emergence of a classroom identity. Ethos, 32(2), 164187.
  • Yoder, A. (2000). Barriers to ego identity status formation: A contextual qualification of Marcia's identity status paradigm, Journal of Adolescence, 23(1), 95106.