SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • American Association of Physics Teachers. (1996). Powerful ideas in the physical sciences. Washington, DC: AAPT.
  • Anderson, C. W., & Smith, E. L. (1987). Teaching science. In V.Richardson-Koehler (Ed.), Educators' handbook: A research perspective (pp. 84111)New York: Longman.
  • Abell, S. K. (2000). From professor to colleague: Creating a professional identity as collaborator in elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 548562.
  • Abell, S. K., Martini, M., & George, M. D. (2001). “That's what scientists have to do”: Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of the nature of science during a moon investigation. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 10951109.
  • Bullough, R. V., Jr., & Pinnegar, S. (2001). Guidelines for quality in autobiographical forms of self-study research. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 1321.
  • Bybee, R. W. (2000). Teaching science as inquiry. In J.Minstrell and E.van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 2046). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
  • Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 916937.
  • Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Routledge.
  • Ellen, R. F. (1984). Ethnographic research: A guide to general conduct. New York: Academic.
  • Elstgeest, J. (2002). The right question at the right time. In W.Harlan (Ed.), Primary science: Taking the plunge (pp. 2535)Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge & teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Hammer, D. (2000). Teacher inquiry. In J.Minstrell and E.van Zee (Eds.) Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 184215). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
  • Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  • Hubbard, P., & Abell, S. (2005). Setting sail or missing the boat: Comparing the beliefs of preservice elementary teachers with and without an inquiry-based physics course. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16(1).
  • Jelly, S. (2002). Helping children raise questions—and answering them. In W.Harlan (Ed.) Primary science: Taking the plunge (pp. 3647). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Keys, C. W., & Bryan, L. A. (2002). Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Education, 38, 631645.
  • Korthagen, F. A. J., & Kessels, J. P. A. M. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(4), 417.
  • Lehrer, R., Carpenter, S., Schauble, L., & Putz A. (2000). Designing classrooms that support inquiry. In J.Minstrell and E.van Zee (Eds.) Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 6579). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Loughran, J. (2002). Understanding self-study of teacher education practices. In J.Loughran and T.Russell (Eds.), Improving teacher education practices through self-study (pp. 239248)London: Routledge Falmer Press.
  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J.Gess-Newsome and N.Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95132)Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Piaget, J., (1970). Piaget's theory. In P. H.Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology New York: Wiley.
  • Plowden Report, (1967). Children and their primary schools. London: Central Advisory Council for Education.
  • Scott, P. H., Asoko, H. M., & Driver, R. H., (1991). Teaching for conceptual change: A review of strategies. In R.Duit, F.Goldberg, & H.Niedderer (Eds.), International workshop on research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies in University of Bremen (pp. 310329)Bremen, Germany: Institute for Science Education.
  • Simpson, D. (2000). Collaborative conversations: Strategies for engaging students in productive dialogs. In J.Minstrell and E.van Zee (Eds.) Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 6579). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
  • Smith, D. C., & Anderson, C. W. (1999). Appropriating scientific practices and discourses with future elementary teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36, 755776.
  • Southerland, S. A, Gess-Newsome, J., & Johnston, A. (2003). Portraying science in the classroom: The manifestation of scientists' beliefs in classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 669691.
  • Volkmann, M. J., & Zgagacz, M. (2004). Learning to teach physics through inquiry: The lived experience of a graduate teaching assistant. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 559579.
  • Weiss, I. R., Banilower, E. R., & Smith, P. S. (2001). Report of the 2000 national survey of science and mathematics education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.
  • Wild, J. (2000). How does a teacher facilitate conceptual development in the intermediate classroom? In J.Minstrell and E.van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 157163). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.