SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Allen, M. (2003). Eight questions on teacher preparation: What does the research say? Denver, CO: Educational Commission of the States.
  • Anderson, R. D., & Mitchener, C. P. (1994). Research on science teacher education. In D. L.Gabel (Ed.), Handbook on science teaching and learning( pp. 344). New York: Macmillan.
  • Carnegie Corporation of New York (2004). Teacher for a new era: A national initiative to improve the quality of teaching. Available at http://www.carnegie.org/sub/program/teachers_announcement.html.
  • Cochran-Smith, M. (2004a). Ask a different question, get a different answer. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(2), 111115.
  • Cochran-Smith, M. (2004b). The problem of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(4), 295299.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Youngs, P. (2002). Defining “highly qualified teachers”: What does “scientifically-based research” actually tell us? Educational Researcher, December, 1325.
  • Galley, M. (2004). Texas model: Go directly to class without teacher training. Education Week, 23 (26), p. 20.
  • Georgia Professional Standards Commission. (2004). Alternative routes. Available at http://www.gapsc.com/Teacher Certification/Documents/alt_routes.asp.
  • Goodnough, A. (2000, November 22). Winnowing process begins for novice teachers. New York Times. Retrieved from http://nytimes.com.
  • Ingersoll, R. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499534.
  • Ingersoll, R. (2002). The teacher shortage: A case of wrong diagnosis and wrong prescription. The NASSP Bulletin, 86, 1631.
  • Keller, B. (2004). Georgia panel eases path to become a teacher. Education Week, 23(24), 20.
  • Kennedy, M. (1999). The problem of evidence in teacher education. In R. R.Roth (Ed.), The role of the university in the preparation of teachers( pp. 87107). Philadelphia: Falmer.
  • Laczko-Kerr, I., & Berliner, D. (2002). The effectiveness of “Teach for America” and other under-certified teachers on student academic achievement: A case of harmful public policy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10, No. 37.
  • Monk, D. (2004). The IES panel for the new study of teacher education. Available at: http://www.ed.psu.edu/news/deanoct04.asp.
  • National Association of State Directors of Teacher Education and Certification (NASDTEC). (2000). Manual of certification and preparation of educational personnel in the United States and Canada, 1999–2000. Dubuque, IA.: Kendall-Hunt Publishing.
  • National Commission on Teaching and America's Future (NCTAF). (2003). No dream denied, a pledge to America's children. Washington DC: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
  • Raymond, M, Fletcher, S. H, & Luque, J. (2001). Teach for America: An evaluation of teacher differences and student outcomes in Houston, Texas. Stanford CA: The Hoover Institution, Center for Research on Education Outcomes.
  • Sack, J. (2002). California definitions of qualified teachers rejected by education department. Education Week, 22(1), 3032.
  • Wilson, S., & Floden, R. (2003). Creating effective teachers: Concise answers for hard questions. Washington DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
  • Wilson, S. M., Floden, R. E., and Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations. Research report prepared for the U.S. Department of Education by the Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy in collaboration with Michigan State University.
  • Wright, D. P., McKibbin, M. D., & Walton, P. H. (1987). The effectiveness of the teacher trainee program: An alternate route into teaching in California. Sacramento, CA: California Commission on Teacher Credentialing.
  • U.S. Department of Education. (2003). Paige announces grant to expand offerings of Alternative Certification Board. Available at http://www.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2003/10/10012003.html.