SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Aikenhead, G. S. (1998). Border crossing: Culture, school science, and assimilation of students. In D. A.Roberts & L.Östman (Eds.), Problems of meaning in science curriculum (pp. 86100). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Bellack, A. A. (1966). The language of the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Brickhouse, N. (1990). Teachers' beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 5362.
  • Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287312.
  • James, W. (1982a). Pragmatism's conception of truth. In H. S.Thayer (Ed.), Pragmatism. The classic writings (pp. 227244). Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company. (Original work published in 1907a).
  • James, W. (1982b). The meaning of the word “truth”. In H. S.Thayer (Ed.), Pragmatism. The classic writings (pp. 249250). Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company. (Original work published in 1907b).
  • Lave, J. (1996). The practice of learning. In S.Chaiklin & J.Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice. Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 332). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Leach, J., Millar, R., Ryder, J., & Séré, M.-G. (2000). Epistemological understanding in science learning: The consistency of representations across contexts. Learning and Instruction, 10, 497527.
  • Meyling, H. (1997). How to change students' conceptions of the epistemology of science. Science & Education, 6, 397416.
  • Monk, R. (1990). Ludwig Wittgenstein. The duty of genius. London: Jonathan Cape.
  • Munby, H., & Roberts, D. A. (1998). Intellectual independence: A potential link between science teaching and responsible citizenship. In D. A.Roberts & L.Östman (Eds.), Problems of meaning in science curriculum (pp. 101114). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Roberts, D. A., & Östman, L. (Eds.). (1998). Problems of meaning in science curriculum. London: Teachers College Press.
  • Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. V.Wertsch, P. DelRio, & A.Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rorty, R. (1980). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Rorty, R. (1990). Pragmatism as anti-representationalism. In J. P.Murphy (Ed.), Pragmatism. From Peirce to Davidson. Oxford: Westview Press.
  • Rorty, R. (1991). Pragmatism and philosophy. In K.Baynes, J.Bohman, & T.McCarthy (Eds.), After Philosophy. End or transformation (pp. 2666). London: The MIT Press.
  • Roth, W-M., & Lucas, K. B. (1997). From “truth” to “invested reality”: A discourse analysis of high school physics. Students' talk about scientific knowledge. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 34, 145179.
  • Roth, W-M., & Roychoudhury, A. (1994). Physics students' epistemologies and views about knowing and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 530.
  • Ryder, J., Leach, J., & Driver, R. (1999). Undergraduate science students' images of science. Journal of research in Science Teaching, 36, 201219.
  • Säljö, R., & Bergqvist, K. (1997). Seeing the light. Discourse and practice in the optics lab. In L.Resnik, R.Säljö, C.Pontecorvo, & B.Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools and reasoning. Essays on situated cognition (pp. 385405). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • Taylor, C. (1991). Overcoming epistemology. In K.Baynes, J.Bohman, & T.McCarthy (Eds.), After philosophy. End or transformation? London: The MIT Press.
  • Tsai, C.-C. (1999). “Laboratory exercises help me memorize the scientific truth”: A study of eight graders' scientific epistemological views and learning in laboratory activities. Science Education, 83, 654674.
  • Wertsch, J. V. (1993). Voices of the mind. A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wickman, P.-O. (2004). The practical epistemologies of the classroom: A study of laboratory work. Science Education, 88, 325344.
  • Wickman, P-O., & Östman, L. (2001a). University students during practical work: Can we make the learning process intelligible? In H.Behrendt, H.Dahncke, R.Duit, W.Gräber, M.Komorek, A.Kross, & P.Reiska (Eds.), Research in science education—Past, present, and future (pp. 319324). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Wickman, P-O., & Östman, L. (2001b). Students' practical epistemologies during laboratory work. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, April 2001.
  • Wickman, P-O., & Östman, L. (2002a). Learning as discourse change: A sociocultural mechanism. Science Education, 86, 601623.
  • Wickman, P-O., & Östman, L. (2002b). Induction as an empirical problem: How students generalize during practical work. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 465486.
  • Wittgenstein, L. (2001). Philosophical investigations. (In German, with a revised English translation, 3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. (Original work published in 1953).
  • Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On certainty. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Yerrick, R. K., Pedersen, J. E., & Arnason, J. (1998): “We're just spectators”: A case study of science teaching, epistemology, and classroom management. Science Education, 82, 619648.