SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Allchin, D. (1993). Reassessing van Helmont, reassessing history. BioScene: Journal of College Biology Teaching, 19, 35.
  • Allchin, D. (1995). How not to teach history in science. In F.Finley, D.Allchin, D.Rhees, & S.Fifield (Eds.), Proceedings, Third International History, Philosophy and Science Teaching Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 1322) Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
  • Allchin, D. (2000a). How not to teach historical cases in science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 30, 3337.
  • Allchin, D. (2000b). Mending Mendelism. The American Biology Teacher, 62, 632639.
  • Allchin, D. (2002). How not to teach history in science. The Pantaneto Forum URL: www.pantaneto.co.uk/issue7/allchin.htm.
  • Allchin, D. (2003a). Scientific myth-conceptions. Science Education, 87, 329351.
  • Allchin, D. (2003b). Lawson's shoehorn, or should the philosophy of science be rated X? Science & Education, 12, 315329.
  • Allchin, D. (2004). Pseudohistory and pseudoscience. Science & Education, 13, 179195.
  • Allchin, D. (2005). William Harvey and capillaries. The American Biology Teacher, 67, 5659.
  • Azimov, I. (1964). A short history of biology. Garden City, NY: Natural History Press.
  • Baumel, H. B., & Berger, J. J. (1973). Biology: Its people and its papers. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
  • Doby, T. (1963). Discoverers of blood circulation: From Aristotile to the times of Da Vinci and Harvey. London: Abelard–Schuman.
  • Harvey, W. (1628). On the motion of the heart and blood in animals (R Willis, Trans.). In C.W.Eliot (Ed). Harvard classics: Scientific papers (Vol. 38). New York: P. F. Collier & Sons, 1897.
  • Hershey, D. R. (2003). Misconceptions about Helmont's willow experiment. Plant Science Bulletin, 49, 7884.
  • Hershey, D. R. (in press). Pseudohistory and pseudoscience: Allchin's historical, conceptual and educational mistakes. Science & Education.
  • Lawson, A. E. (2000). The generality of the hypothetico-deductive method: Making scientific thinking explicit. The American Biology Teacher, 62, 482495.
  • Lawson, A. E. (2003). Allchin's shoehorn, or why science is hypothetico-deductive. Science & Education, 12, 331337.
  • Lewis, R. W. (1988). Biology: A hypothetico-deductive science. The American Biology Teacher, 50, 362366.
  • Westerland, J., & Fairbanks, D. (2004). Gregor Mendel and “myth-conceptions.” Science Education, 88, 754758.
  • Wivagg, D., & Allchin, D. (2002). The dogma of “the” scientific method. The American Biology Teacher, 64, 484485.