SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Damián Gelerstein, Rodrigo del Río, Miguel Nussbaum, Pablo Chiuminatto, Ximena López, Designing and implementing a test for measuring critical thinking in primary school, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2016, 20, 40

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Yael Kesner Baruch, Ornit Spektor-Levy, Nira Mashal, PRE-SCHOOLERS’ VERBAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESPONSES AS INDICATORS OF ATTITUDES AND SCIENTIFIC CURIOSITY, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2016, 14, 1, 125

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Phil Seok Oh, A Theoretical Review and Trial Application of the 'Resources-Based View' (RBV) as an Alternative Cognitive Theory, Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 2015, 35, 6, 971

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Rola Khishfe, Explicit Nature of Science and Argumentation Instruction in the Context of Socioscientific Issues: An effect on student learning and transfer, International Journal of Science Education, 2014, 36, 6, 974

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    BRANDON R. EMIG, SCOTT McDONALD, CARLA ZEMBAL-SAUL, SUSAN G. STRAUSS, Inviting Argument by Analogy: Analogical-Mapping-Based Comparison Activities as a Scaffold for Small-Group Argumentation, Science Education, 2014, 98, 2
  6. 6
    Robyn M. Gillies, Kim Nichols, Gilbert Burgh, Michele Haynes, Primary students’ scientific reasoning and discourse during cooperative inquiry-based science activities, International Journal of Educational Research, 2014, 63, 127

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Danielle B. Harlow, Lauren H. Swanson, Valerie K. Otero, Prospective Elementary Teachers’ Analysis of Children’s Science Talk in an Undergraduate Physics Course, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2014, 25, 1, 97

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Minseok Ko, Ilho Yang, Analysis on the Relationship Between the Construct Level of Analogical Reasoning and the Construction of Explanatory Model Observed in Small Group Discussions on Scientific Problem Solving, Journal of The Korean Association For Research In Science Education, 2013, 33, 2, 522

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Jesper Haglund, Collaborative and self-generated analogies in science education, Studies in Science Education, 2013, 49, 1, 35

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    Nilmara Braga Mozzer, Rosária Justi, Science Teachers’ Analogical Reasoning, Research in Science Education, 2013, 43, 4, 1689

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    Tzu-Jung Lin, Richard C. Anderson, John E. Hummel, May Jadallah, Brian W. Miller, Kim Nguyen-Jahiel, Joshua A. Morris, Li-Jen Kuo, Il-Hee Kim, Xiaoying Wu, Ting Dong, Children’s Use of Analogy During Collaborative Reasoning, Child Development, 2012, 83, 4
  12. You have free access to this content12
    Leema K. Berland, David Hammer, Framing for scientific argumentation, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2012, 49, 1
  13. 13
    April C. Maskiewicz, Victoria A. Winters, Understanding the co-construction of inquiry practices: A case study of a responsive teaching environment, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2012, 49, 4
  14. 14
    Jesper Haglund, Fredrik Jeppsson, Johanna Andersson, Young children's analogical reasoning in science domains, Science Education, 2012, 96, 4
  15. 15
    Alberto Bellocchi, Stephen M. Ritchie, Investigating and theorizing discourse during analogy writing in chemistry, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2011, 48, 7
  16. 16
    Meng-Fei Cheng, David E. Brown, Conceptual Resources in Self-developed Explanatory Models: The importance of integrating conscious and intuitive knowledge, International Journal of Science Education, 2010, 32, 17, 2367

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Elaine V. Howes, Miyoun Lim, Jaclyn Campos, Journeys into inquiry-based elementary science: Literacy practices, questioning, and empirical study, Science Education, 2009, 93, 2
  18. 18
    Victor Sampson, Douglas Clark, The impact of collaboration on the outcomes of scientific argumentation, Science Education, 2009, 93, 3
  19. 19
    R.Z. Zheng, W. Yang, D. Garcia, E.P. McCadden, Effects of multimedia and schema induced analogical reasoning on science learning, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2008, 24, 6