SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, L. L. (1998). News from the Committee on Education and Exhibit Design. EAZA News 23, 8.
  • Anderson, D., Lucas, K. B., & Ginns, I. S. (2003). Theoretical perspectives on learning in an informal setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 177199.
  • Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Berck, K.-H., & Klee, R. (1992). Interesse an Tier- und Pflanzenarten und Handeln im Natur-Umweltschutz. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag.
  • Birney, B. (1988). Criteria for successful museum and zoo visits: Children offer guidance. Curator, 31(4), 292316.
  • Bitgood, S. (1989). School field trips: An overview. Visitor Behavior, 4(2), 36.
  • Bitgood, S. (1992). The impact of a zoo visit on attitudes. Visitor Behavior, 7(3), 710.
  • Borun, M., Chamber, M. B., Dritsas, J., & Johnson, J. I. (1997). Enhancing family learning through exhibits. Curator, 40(4), 279295.
  • Brody, M., Hall, R., Tomkiewicz, W., & Graves, J. (2002). Park visitors' understandings, values and beliefs related to their experience at Midway Geyser Basin, Yellowstone National Park, USA. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 11191141.
  • Cox-Petersen, A. M., Marsh, D. D., Kisiel, J., & Melber, L. M. (2003). Investigation of guided school tours, student learning, and science reform recommendations at a museum of natural history. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 200218.
  • De Boer, L. E. M. (1992). EEP—European zoos care about the conservation of endangered species. European Association of Zoological Gardens and Aquaria (EAZA).
  • Dierking, L. D., & Falk, J. H. (1994). Family behaviour and learning in informal science settings: A review of the research. Science Education, 78(1), 5772.
  • Dierking, L. D., Falk, J. H., Rennie, L., Anderson, D., & Ellenbogen, K. (2003). Policy statement of the “Informal Science Education” Ad Hoc Committee. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 108111.
  • Falk, J. H. (2001). Free-choice science learning: Framing the discussion. In: J. H.Falk (Ed.), Free-choice science education: How we learn science outside of school (pp. 320). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Falk, J. H. (2004). The director's cut: Toward an improved understanding of learning from museums. Science Education, 88 (Suppl. 1), S83S96.
  • Falk, J. H., & Adelman, L. M. (2003). Investigating the impact of prior knowledge and interest on aquarium visitor learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 163176.
  • Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (1997). School field trips: Assessing their long-term impact. Curator, 40(3), 211218.
  • Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
  • Falk, J. H., Koran, J. J., Jr., & Dierking, L. D. (1986). The things of science: Assessing the learning potential of science museums. Science Education, 70(5), 503508.
  • Falk, J. H., Moussouri, T., & Coulson, D. (1998). The effect of visitors' agendas on museum learning. Curator, 41(2), 107120.
  • Hawksworth, D. L. (1995). The resource base for biodiversity assessments. In V. H.Heywood (Ed.), Global biodiversity assessment (pp. 545605). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hennig, S., & Köhle, K. (1987). Der Tierparkbesuch: soziologische Untersuchungen zur Bedeutung eines Freizeitangebotes für den Menschen. Der Zoologische Garten, 57(1), 1525.
  • Holzer, D., Scott, D., & Bixler, R. (1997). The long-lasting effect of early zoo visits. Curator, 40(4), 255257.
  • IUDZG/CBSG (IUCN/SSC) (1993). The world zoo conservation strategy. The role of zoos and aquaria of the world in global conservation. Brookfield, IL: Chicago Zoological Society.
  • Kamer, T. (1998). Informelle Umweltbildung im Tierpark Goldau—eine Evaluation der Informationsvermittlung und der Erwartungen des Publikums. Unpublished Master thesis. University of Zürich, Department of Environmental Sciences, Zürich.
  • Kellert, S. R., Black, M., Rush, C. R., & Bath, A. J. (1996). Human culture and large carnivore conservation in North America. Conservation Biology, 10(4), 977989.
  • Kelly, L. (1999). Developing access to collections: Assessing user need. Proceedings from the 1999 Museums Australia Conference, Albury. Available at http://sector.amol.org.au/publications_archive/archived_conference_papers/museums_australia_conference_1999
  • Koran, J. J., Jr., Morrison, L., Lehman, J. R., Koran, M. L., & Gandara, L. (1984). Attention and curiosity in museums. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(4), 357363.
  • Korenic, M. S., & Young, A. M. (1991). The rain forest in Milwaukee: An evaluation. Curator, 34(2), 144159.
  • Marsland, D. (1995). An observational study of visitor use of zoo graphic exhibits. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of Southampton, Faculty of Science, Southampton.
  • Martin, A. (1997). One zoo—one vision? Journal of the International Association of Zoo Educators, 34, 814.
  • Meffe, G. K., & Carroll, C. R. (1994). Principles of conservation biology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates Inc.
  • Milan, L. M., & Wourms, M. K. (1992). A zoological park is not just another museum. Curator, 35(2), 120135.
  • Milan, L. M., & Wourms, M. K. (1993). The world of birds at the Bronx Zoo/Wildlife Conservation Park: Visitor expectations and experiences. International Zoo Yearbook, 32, 204212.
  • Miller, S., & Gore, J. (1996). Do they actually read it? Unpublished paper presented at the Congress of the European Association of Zoo Educators, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Moscardo, G. M. (1988). Toward a cognitive model of visitor responses in interpretive centers. The Journal of Environmental Education, 20(1), 2938.
  • Negro, J. J., Margalida, A., Hiraldo, F., & Heredia, R. (1999). The function of the cosmetic coloration of bearded vultures: When art imitates life. Animal Behaviour, 58(5), F14F17.
  • Peart, B. (1984). Interpretation in informal learning settings. Journal of Interpretation, 2(1), 3340.
  • Rahm, I. (2002). Emergent learning opportunities in an inner-city youth gardening program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(2), 164184.
  • Rennie, L. J., Feher, E., Dierking, L. D., & Falk, J. H. (2003). Toward an agenda for advancing research on science learning in out-of-school settings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 112120.
  • Rennie, L. J., & Johnston, D. J. (2004). The nature of learning and its implications for research on learning from museums. International Journal of Science Education, 88 (Suppl. 1), S4S16.
  • Rosenthal, E., & Blankman-Hetrick, J. (2002). Conversations across time: Family learning in a living history museum. In G.Leinhardt, K.Crowley, & K.Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 305330). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Sandifer, C. (2003). Technological novelty and open-endedness: Two characteristics of interactive exhibits that contribute to the holding of visitor attention in a science museum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 121137.
  • Scheiner, S. M., & Gurevitch, J. (Eds.). (1993). Design and analysis of ecological experiments. New York: Chapman and Hall.
  • Schoch, P. (1997). Planung und Durchführung einer Zoobesucherbefragung als Grundlage für ein neues Informations- und Kommunikationskonzept für den Zolli Basel. Unpublished Master thesis. Höhere Wirtschafts- und Verwaltungsschule Basel, Basel.
  • Schulz, W. (1985). Einstellung zur Natur. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Faculty of Forestry, München, Germany.
  • Screven, C. G. (1986). Exhibitions and information centers: Some principles and approaches. Curator, 29(2), 109137.
  • Serrell, B. (1977). Survey of visitor attitudes and awareness at an aquarium. Curator, 20(1), 4852.
  • SPSS Inc. (1998). SPSS for Windows (release 8.0.1). Chicago, IL.
  • Stokking, K., Zoelen, L. van, Aert, L. van, & Young, R. (1995). Evaluating activities in environmental education—a helping hand. Utrecht, The Netherlands: ISDR University of Utrecht.
  • Stronck, D. (1983). The comparative effects of different museum tours on children's attitudes and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(2), 283290.
  • Swanagan, J. S. (2000). Factors influencing zoo visitors' conservation attitudes and behavior. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(4), 2631.
  • Tamir, P. (1990–1991). Factors associated with the relationship between formal, informal, and nonformal science learning. The Journal of Environmental Education, 22(2), 3442.
  • Tunnicliffe, S. D. (1995). Talking about animals: Studies of young children visiting zoos, a natural history museum and a farm. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. King's College, London.
  • Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2000). Conversations of family and primary school groups at robotic dinosaur exhibits in a museum: What do they talk about? International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 739754.
  • Tunnicliffe, S. D., Lucas, A. M., & Osborne, J. (1997). School visits to zoos and museums: A missed educational opportunity? International Journal of Science Education 19(9), 10391056.
  • UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization). (1993). UNESCO, Agenda 21 and UNCED follow–up. Paris: UNESCO.
  • Wilson, E. O., & Peter, F. M. (Eds.). (1988). Biodiversity. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
  • Wineman, J., Piper, C., & Maple, T. L. (1996). Zoos in transition: Enriching conservation education for a new generation. Curator, 39(2), 94107.
  • Woolard, S. P., & Smart, A. C. (1996). “Zoolympics”: An evaluation of an interactive education trail at Bristol Zoo. International Zoo News, 43(6), 411420.
  • WRI (World Resources Institute), & IUCN (The World Conservation Union)/UNEP (United Nations Environment Program). (1992). Global biodiversity strategy: Guidelines for action to save and use earth's biotic wealth sustainably and equitably. Washington, DC: WRI, IUCN/UNEP.
  • Zaremba, S. B., & Toedter, L. J. (1995). The effect of new exhibit signs on visitor behaviour. Journal of the International Association of Zoo Educators, 31, 3439.