SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Aulls, M. W. (1998). Contributions of classroom discourse to what content students learn during curriculum enactment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 5669.
  • Berg, C. A. R., Bergendahl, V. C. B., Lundberg, B. K. S., & Tibell, L. (2003). Benefiting from an open-ended experiment? A comparison of attitudes to, and outcomes of, an expository versus an open-inquiry version of the same experiment. International Journal of Science Education, 25(3), 351372.
  • Brandwein, P. F. (1962). Elements in a strategy for teaching science in the elementary school. In The Burton lectures. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.
  • Bredderman, T. (1983). Effects of activity-based elementary science on student outcomes: A quantitative synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 499518.
  • Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Chang, C.-Y., & Mao, S.-L. (1999). Comparison of Taiwan science students' outcomes with inquiry-group versus traditional instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 92(6), 340346.
  • Charmaz, K. (1983). The grounded theory method: An explication and interpretation. In R.Emerson (Ed.), Contemporary field research: A collection of readings (pp. 109126). Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
  • Cobb, P. (1994). Constructivism in mathematics and science education. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 4.
  • Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916937.
  • Curriculum Research and Development Group. (2003). Foundational approaches in science teaching I. Retrieved on June 1, 2004 from http://www.hawaii.edu/crdg/FAST.pdf.
  • Driver, R. (1983). The pupil as scientist? Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
  • Edwards, D. (1993). But what do children really think? Discourse analysis and conceptual content in children's talk. Cognition and Instruction, 11(3/4), 207225.
  • Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Routledge.
  • Goetz, J. P., & LeCompte, M. D. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. Orlando, FL: Academic.
  • Johnson, R. (1997). Examining the validity structure of qualitative research. Educational Assessment, 118, 282292.
  • Kelly, G. J., & Crawford, T. (1997). An ethnographic investigation of the discourse processes of school science. Science Education, 81(5), 533559.
  • Khishfe, R., & Abd-Al-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551578.
  • Klahr, D., & Nigam, M. (2004). The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: Effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological Science, 15(10), 661667.
    Direct Link:
  • Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Lott, G. W. (1983). The effect of inquiry teaching and advance organizers upon student outcomes in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(5), 437451.
  • Magnusson, S. J., & Palinscar, A. S. (1995). The learning environment as a site of science education reform. Theory into Practice, 34(1), 4350.
  • National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. (2001). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2001).
  • Pottenger, F. M., & Young, D. B. (1992). The local environment: FAST 1. Foundational approaches to science teaching. (2nd ed.). Honolulu, HI: Curriculum Research and Development Group.
  • Pottenger, F. M., & Young, D. B. (1996). The local environment teacher's guide (2nd ed.). Honolulu, HI: Curriculum Research and Development Group.
  • Powney, J., & Watts, M. (1987). Interviewing in educational research. London: Routledge.
  • Rahm, J., Miller, H. C., Hartley, L., & Moore, J. C. (2003). The value of an emergent notion of authenticity: Examples from two student/teacher-scientist partnership programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(8), 737756.
  • Roehrig, G. H. (2004). Constraints experienced by beginning secondary science teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 324.
  • Roth, W.-M. (1996). Teacher questioning in an open-inquiry learning environment: Interactions of context, content, and student response. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(7), 709736.
  • Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2003). On implementation and opportunity to learn. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Rutherford, F. J. (1960). The role of inquiry in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2, 8084.
  • Schneider, R. M., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (2002). Performance of students in project-based science classrooms on a national measure of science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(5), 410422.
  • Schwab, J. J. (1962a). The concept of the structure of a discipline. The Educational Record, 43(3), 197205.
  • Schwab, J. J. (1962b). The teaching of science as enquiry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 475522.
  • Shavelson, R. J., & Young, D. B. (2000). Embedding assessments in the FAST curriculum: On beginning the romance among curriculum, teaching, and assessment. An assessment project proposal to the National Science Foundation.
  • Shulman, L. S., & Keislar, E. R. (Eds.). (1966). Learning by discovery: A critical appraisal. Chicago: Rand McNally.
  • Shulman, L. S., & Tamir, P. (1973). Research on teaching in the natural sciences. In R. M. W.Traver (Ed.), Second handbook of research on teaching (pp. 10981148). Chicago: Rand McNally.
  • Shymansky, J. A., Hedges, L. V., & Woodworth, G. (1990). A reassessment of the effects of inquiry-based science curricula of the 60's on student performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(2), 127144.
  • Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
  • Tobin, K. G., Tippins, D. J., & Gallard, A. J. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In D. L.Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning New York: Macmillan.
  • vanZee, E. H., Iwasyk, M., Kurose, A., Simpson, D., & Wild, J. (2001). Student and teacher questioning during conversations about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 159190.
  • VonSecker, C. E., & Lissitz, R. W. (1999). Estimating the impact of instructional practices on student achievement in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 11101126.
  • Wallace, C. S., & Kang, N.-H. (2004). An investigation of experienced secondary science teachers' beliefs about inquiry: An examination of competing belief sets. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(9), 936960.
  • Weinstein, T., Boulanger, F. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1982). Science curriculum effects in high school: A quantitative synthesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19(6), 511522.
  • Welch, W. W., Klopfer, L. E., Aikenhead, G. S., & Robinson, J. T. (1981). The role of inquiry in science education: Analysis and recommendations. Science Education, 65(1), 3350.
  • Wise, K. C., & Okey, J. R. (1983). A meta-analysis of the effects of various science teaching strategies on achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(5), 419435.
  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.