SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 3242.
  • Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 149.
  • Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175218.
  • Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing and mathematics. In L.Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction. Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (Eds.). (1985). Children's ideas in science. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
  • Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education. The importance of theories and their development. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Duschl, R. A., & Gitomer, D. (Eds.). (1994). The acids & bases unit. Project SEPIA. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.
  • Egan-Robertson, A., & Willett, J. (1998). Students as ethnographers, thinking and doing ethnography: A bibliographic essay. In A.Egan-Robertson & D.Bloome (Eds.), Students as researchers of culture and language in their own communities (pp. 132). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  • Erduran, S. (1999). Merging curriculum design with chemical epistemology: A case of teaching and learning chemistry through modeling. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
  • Erduran, S. (2003). Examining the mismatch between pupil and teacher knowledge in acid-base chemistry. School Science Review, 84, 8187
  • Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and methods. London: Routledge.
  • Gil Pérez, D., & Carrascosa Alis, J. (1994). Bringing pupils' learning closer to a scientific construction of knowledge: A permanent feature in innovations in science teaching. Science Education, 78, 301315.
  • Goodwin, C., & Duranti, A. (1992). Rethinking context: An introduction. In A.Duranti & C.Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context (pp. 142). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hodson, D. (1988). Toward a philosophically more valid science curriculum. Science Education, 72, 1940
  • Hodson, D. (1990). A critical look at practical work in school science. School Science Review, 70, 3340.
  • Kelly, G. J., & Chen, C. (1999). The sound of music: Constructing science as sociocultural practices through oral and written discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 883915
  • Kelly, G. J., & Crawford, T. (1997). An ethnographic investigation of the discourse processes of school science. Science Education, 81, 533559.
  • Kelly, G. J., & Duschl, R. A. (2002, April). Toward a research agenda for epistemological studies in science education. Paper presented to the annual meeting of NARST, New Orleans, LA.
  • Kelly, G. J., & Takao, A. (2002). Epistemic levels in argument: An analysis of university oceanography students' use of evidence in writing. Science Education, 86, 314342.
  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science. Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Lemke, J. (1998). Analysing verbal data: Principles, methods and problems. In B. J.Fraser & K. J.Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 11751189). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Molander, B-O. (1997). Joint discourses or disjointed courses. A study on learning in upper secondary school. Stockholm: HLS Förlag.
  • Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  • Nakhleh, M. B., & Krajcik, J. S. (1994). Influence of levels of information as presented by different technologies on students' understanding of acid, base and pH concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 10771096.
  • Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Östman, L. (1998). How companion meanings are expressed in science education discourse. In D.ARoberts & L.Östman, (Eds.), Problems of meaning in science curriculum (pp. 5470). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Perales Palacios, F. J. (2000). La resolución de problemas (Solving problems). In F. J. Perales & P.Cañal (Eds.), Didáctica de las ciencias experimentales (science education) (pp. 291306). Alcoy: Marfil.
  • Reid, N., & Yang, M-J. (2002). Open-ended problem solving in school chemistry: A preliminary investigation. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 13131332.
  • Reigosa Castro, C. (2002). Discurso en el laboratorio durante la resolución de problemas de Física y Química: Acciones, justificaciones, cultura científica y mediación. (Discourse in the laboratory during the solution of physics and chemistry problems: actions, justification, scientific culture and mediation). Doctoral dissertation, University of Santiago de Compostela, UMI.
  • Reigosa, C., Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & García-Rodeja, E. (submitted). Scaffolded problem solving in the physics and chemistry laboratory: Difficulties and transfer of responsibility.
  • Tan, K-C-D., Goh, N-K., Chia, L.-S., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Students' understanding of acid, base and salt reactions in qualitative analysis. School Science Review, 84, 8997.
  • Toulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding, Vol. I: The collective use and evolution of concepts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • West, D. M., & Sterling, D. R. (2001). Soil studies: Applying acid–base chemistry to environmental analysis. The Science Teacher, 68, 3640.