SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Abell, S., Martini, M., & George, M. (2001). That's what scientists have to do: Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of the nature of science during a moon investigation. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 10951109.
  • Acevedo, J. A. (2004). Reflexiones sobre las finalidades de la enseñanza de las ciencias: Educación científica para la ciudadanía [Reflecting on the aims of the science teaching: Scientific education for citizenship]. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 1(1), 316. Retrieved on January 13, 2005, from http://www.apac-eureka.org/revista/Larevista.htm.
  • Acevedo, J. A., Acevedo, P., Manassero, M. A., & Vázquez, A. (2001). Avances metodológicos en la investigación sobre evaluación de actitudes y creencias CTS [Methodological advances in the investigation about STS attitude and belief evaluation].
  • Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, edición digital. Retrieved on January 10, 2005, from http://www.campus-oei.org/revista/deloslectores/Acevedo.PDF.
  • Acevedo, J. A., Vázquez, A., & Manassero, M. A. (2003). Papel de la educación CTS en una alfabetización científica y tecnológica para todas las personas [The role of STS education in a scientific and technological literacy for all]. Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 2(2). Retrieved on January 12, 2005, from http://www.saum.uvigo.es/reec/.
  • Acevedo, J. A., Vázquez, A., Martín-Gordillo, M., Oliva, J. M., Acevedo, P., Paixão, M. F., & Manassero, M. A. (2005). Naturaleza de la ciencia y educación científica para la participación ciudadana. Una revisión crítica [The nature of science and science education for the civic participation. A critical review]. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 2(2), 121140. Retrieved on January 13, 2005, from http://www.apac-eureka.org/revista/Larevista.htm.
  • Aikenhead, G. S. (1988). An analysis of four ways of assessing student beliefs about STS topics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 607629.
  • Aikenhead, G. S. (1994a). What is STS science teaching? In J.Solomon & G. S.Aikenhead (Eds.), STS education: International perspectives on reform (pp. 4759). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Aikenhead, G. S. (1994b). Consequences to learning science trough STS: A research perspective. In J.Solomon & G. S.Aikenhead (Eds.), STS education: International perspectives on reform (pp. 169186). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Aikenhead, G. S. (2003). Review of research on humanistic perspectives in science curricula. Paper presented at the 4th Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA) on the Research and the Quality of Science Education, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands. Retrieved on July 27, 2003, from http://www.usask.ca/education/people/aikenhead/ESERA_2.pdf
  • Aikenhead, G. S., Fleming, R.W., & Ryan, A. G. (1987). High-school graduates' beliefs about science-technology-society, I: Methods and issues in monitoring student views. Science Education, 71, 145161.
  • Aikenhead, G. S., & Ryan, A. G. (1992). The development of a new instrument: “Views on science-technology-society” (VOSTS). Science Education, 76, 477491.
  • Aikenhead, G. S., Ryan, A. G., & Désautels, J. (1989a). Monitoring students' views on science–technology–society topics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, CA.
  • Aikenhead, G. S., Ryan, A. G., & Fleming, R.W. (1989b). Views on science-technology-society (form CDN. mc. 5). Saskatoon, Canada: Department of Curriculum Studies, College of Education, University of Saskatchewan.
  • Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 295317.
  • Alters, B. J. (1997a). Nature of science: A diversity or uniformity of ideas? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 11051108.
  • Alters, B. J. (1997b). Whose nature of science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 3955.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: A Project 2061 report. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Bartholomew, H., Osborne, J., & Ratcliffe, M. (2004). Teaching students “ideas-about-science”: Five dimensions of effective practice. Science Education, 88, 655682.
  • Bell, R. L., Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1998). Implicit versus explicit nature of science instruction: An explicit response to Palmquist and Finley. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 10571061.
  • Botton, C., & Brown, C. (1998). The reliability of some VOSTS items when used with preservice secondary science teachers in England. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 5371.
  • Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Cajas, F. (1999). Public understanding of science: Using technology to enhance school science in everyday life. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 765773.
  • Cross, R. T., & Fensham, P. J. (Eds.). (2000). Science and the citizen for educators and the public. Melbourne Studies in Education, 4 (special issue). Melbourne: Arena Publications.
  • Désautels, J., & Larochelle, M. (2003). Educación científica: el regreso del ciudadano y de la ciudadana [Scientific education: The return of the citizens]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 21, 320.
  • Driver, R. (1989). Students' conceptions and the learning of science. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 481490.
  • Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
  • Fensham, P. J. (1985). Science for all: A reflective essay. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17, 415435.
  • Fensham, P. J. (2004). Beyond knowledge: Other scientific qualities as outcomes for school science education. In R. M.Janiuk & E.Samonek-Miciuk (Eds.), Science and technology education for a diverse world—Dilemmas, needs and partnerships. Paper presented at International Organization for Science and Technology Education (IOSTE) XIth Symposium Proceedings (pp. 2325). Lublin, Poland: Marie Curie-Sklodowska University Press.
  • Fleming, R. W. (1988). Undergraduate science students' views on the relationship between science, technology, and society. International Journal of Science Education, 10, 449463.
  • Gardner, P. L. (1996). The dimensionality of attitude scales: A widely misunderstood idea. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 913919.
  • Haidar, A. H. (1999). Emirates pre-service and in-service teachers' views about the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 807822.
  • Jenkins, E. (1999). School science, citizenship and the public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 703710.
  • Kemp, A. C. (2002). Implications of diverse meanings for “scientific literac”. In P. A.Rubba, J. A.Rye, W. J.Di Biase, & B. A.Crawford (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2002 Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science (pp. 12021229). Pensacola, FL: AETS.
  • Kolstø, S. D. (2001a). Science education for citizenship: Thoughtful decision-making about science-related social issues. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Kolstø, S. D. (2001b). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85, 291310.
  • Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331359.
  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Towards valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497521.
  • Lederman, N. G., & O'Malley, M. (1990). Students' perceptions of tentativeness in science: Development, use, and sources of change. Science Education, 74, 225239.
  • Lederman, N. G., Wade, P. D., & Bell, R. L. (1998). Assessing understanding of the nature of science: A historical perspective. In W. F.McComas (Ed.), The nature of science and science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 331350). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Lin, H-S. (1998, April). Promoting pre-service science teachers' understanding about the nature of science through history of science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Diego, CA.
  • Manassero, M. A., & Vázquez, A. (1998). Opinions sobre ciència, tecnologia i societat. [Views on science, technology, and society]. Palma de Mallorca: Govern Balear, Conselleria d'Educació, Cultura i Esports.
  • Manassero, M. A., Vázquez, A., & Acevedo, J. A. (2001). Avaluació dels temes de ciència, tecnologia i societat [Evaluation of the science, technology, and society issues]. Palma de Mallorca: Conselleria d'Educació i Cultura del Govern de les Illes Ballears.
  • Manassero, M. A., Vázquez, A., & Acevedo, J. A. (2003a). Cuestionario de opiniones sobre ciencia, tecnologia i societat (COCTS) [Views on Science, Technology, and Society Questionnaire]. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Available at http://www.ets.org/testcoll/.
  • Manassero, M. A., Vázquez, A., & Acevedo, J. A. (2003b, August). Views on science–technology–society questionnaire: Categories and applications. Paper presented at the 4th Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA) on the Research and the Quality of Science Education, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands.
  • Manassero, M. A., Vázquez, A., & Acevedo, J. A. (2004). Evaluación de las actitudes del profesorado respecto a los temas CTS: nuevos avances metodológicos [Evaluation of the teachers' attitudes on the STS topics: New methodological advances]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 22, 299312.
  • Mbajiorgu, N. M., & Ali, A. (2003). Relationship between STS approach, scientific literacy, and achievement in biology. Science Education, 87, 3139.
  • McComas, W. F. (Ed.). (1998). The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Almazroa, H. (1998). The role and character of the nature of science in science education. In W. F.McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education. Rationales and strategies (pp. 340). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Moss, D. M., Abrams, E. D., & Robb, J. (2001). Examining student conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 771790.
  • Munby, H. (1982). The place of teachers' beliefs in research on teacher thinking and decision making, and an alternative methodology. Instructional Science, 11, 201225.
  • National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
  • Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87, 224240.
  • Nunes, M. do C. (1996). Construction of an instrument for detecting 2nd cycle students' points of view on science–technology–society. Unpublished M. Ed. Thesis, Centro de Investigação em Educação, Faculdade de Ciências, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Petty, R. E., & Krosnick, J. A. (1995). Attitude strength. Antecedents and consequences. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
  • Pfund, H., & Duit, R. (Eds.). (1991). Bibliography: Students' alternative frameworks and science education. Kiel, Grmany: IPN-Kiel.
  • Roth, W-M. (2002). Aprender ciencias en y para la comunidad [Learning science in and for the community]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 20, 195208.
  • Roth, W-M., & Désautels, J. (2004). Educating for citizenship: Reappraising the role of science education. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 4, 149168.
  • Roth, W-M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88, 263291.
  • Rubba, P. A., & Harkness, W. L. (1993). Examination of preservice and in-service secondary science teachers' beliefs about science–technology–society interactions. Science Education, 77, 407431.
  • Rubba, P. A., Schoneweg-Bradford, C. S., & Harkness, W. J. (1996). A new scoring procedure for the views on science–technology–society instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 387400.
  • Ryder, J., & Leach, J. (1999). University science students' experiences of investigative project work and their images of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 945946.
  • Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 513536.
  • Shamos, M. H. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Shapiro, B. L. (1996). A case study of change in elementary student teacher thinking during an independent investigation in science: Learning about the “face of science that does not yet know”. Science Education, 80, 535560.
  • Shrigley, R. L., & Koballa, T. R., Jr. (1992). A decade of attitude research based on Hovland's learning model. Science Education, 76, 1742.
  • Smith, M. U., Lederman, N. G., Bell, R. L., McComas, W. F., & Clough, M. P. (1997). How great is the disagreement about the nature of science: A response to alters. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 11011103.
  • Solomon, J. (1994). Knowledge, values and the public choice of science knowledge. In J.Solomon & G. S.Aikenhead (Eds.), STS education: International perspectives on reform (pp. 99110). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Solomon, J., & Thomas, J. (1999). Science education for the public understanding of science. Studies in Science Education, 33, 6190.
  • Vázquez, A., & Manassero, M. A. (1995). Actitudes relacionadas con la ciencia: una revisión conceptual [Science-related attitudes: A conceptual review]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 13, 337346.
  • Vázquez, A., & Manassero, M. A. (1999). New response and scoring models for the “Views on Science-Technology-Society” instrument (VOSTS). International Journal of Science Education, 21, 231247.
  • Vázquez, A., Manassero, M. A., & Acevedo, J. A. (2003, August). Significant and valid assessment of STS themes through the COCTS. Paper presented at the 4th Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA) on Research and the Quality of Science Education, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands.
  • Vázquez, A., Manassero, M. A., & Acevedo, J. A. (2005). Quantitative analysis of complex multiple-choice items in science technology and society: Item scaling. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 7 (1). Retrieved on June 6, 2005 from http://redie.uabc.mx/vol7no1/contents-vazquez.html
  • Watts, M., & Alsop, S. (2000). The affective dimensions of learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 12191220.
  • Yager, R. E., & Weld, J. D. (1999). Scope, sequence and co-ordination: The Iowa project, a national reform effort in the USA. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 169194.
  • Zeidler, D. L. (2003). The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
  • Zoller, U., Donn, S., Wild, R., & Beckett, P. (1991). Teachers' beliefs and views on selected science–technology–society topics: A probe into STS literacy versus indoctrination. Science Education, 75, 541561.