SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & BouJaude, S. (1997). An exploratory study of the knowledge base for science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(7), 673699.
  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665701.
  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Lederman, N. G., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2001, January). Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire (VNOS): Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Paper presented at the Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science (AETS), Costa Mesa, CA.
  • Abell, S. K., & Bryan, L. A. (1997). Reconceptualizing the elementary science methods course using a reflection orientation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8(3), 153166.
  • Abell, S. K., & Smith, D. C. (1994). What is science?: Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 16(4), 475487.
  • AETS Ad Hoc Committee on Science Teacher Educator Standards: Lederman, N. G., Kuerbis, P. J., Loving, C. C., Ramey-Gassert, L., Roychoudhury, A., & Spector, B. S. (1997). AETS (the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science) position statement: Professional knowledge standards for science teacher educators. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8(4), 233240.
  • Aguirre, J. M., Haggerty, S. M., & Linder, C. J. (1990). Student–teachers' conceptions of science, teaching and learning: A case study in preservice science education. International Journal of Science Education, 12(4), 381390.
  • Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295317.
  • Akindehin, F. (1988). Effect of an instructional package on preservice science teachers' understanding of the nature of science and acquisition of science-related attitudes. Science Education, 72(1), 7382.
  • Altan, M. Z. (1998). A call for change and pedagogy: A critical analysis of teacher education in Turkey. European Journal of Education, 33(4), 407417.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Ayas, A., Cepni, S., & Akdeniz, A. R. (1993). Development of the Turkish secondary curriculum. Science Education, 77(4), 433440.
  • Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87, 352377.
  • Bentley, M. L., & Fleury, S. C. (1998). Of starting points and destinations: Teacher education and the nature of science. In W. F.McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers' beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 5362.
  • Bryan, L. A. (2003). Nestedness of beliefs: Examining a prospective elementary teacher's belief system about science teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(9), 835869.
  • Cakici, Y. (2001). Exploring upper primary level Turkish pupils' understanding of nutrition and digestion. Unpublished EdD thesis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham.
  • Cakir, M., & Crawford, B. (2004). Enhancing prospective science teacher's understandings of scientific inquiry and Mendelian genetics using computer simulation. Paper presented at the Annual International Conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver, CA, April 1–3, 2004.
  • Cakiroglu, E., & Cakiroglu, J. (2003). Reflections on teacher education in Turkey. European Journal of Teacher Education, 26(2), 253264.
  • Carey, R. L., & Stauss, N. G. (1970). An analysis of experienced science teachers' understanding of the nature of science. School Science and Mathematics, 70, 366376.
  • Chalmers, A. F. (1999). What is this thing called science? (3rd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Cimer, A. (2004). A study of Turkish biology teachers' and students' views of effective teaching for improving teaching in schools and teacher education. Unpublished EdD thesis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham.
  • Craven, J. A., III. (1998). Mentoring future mentors: The preparation of science teacher educators. Paper presented at the Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Day, C. (1987). Professional learning through collaborative in-service activity. In J.Smyth (Ed.), Educating teachers: Changing the nature of pedagogical knowledge (pp. 207222)Lewes: The Falmer Press.
  • Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Eichinger, D. C., Abell, S. K., & Dagher, Z. R. (1997). Developing a graduate level science education course on the nature of science. Science & Education, 6, 417429.
  • Ekiz, D. (2001). Exploring primary school teachers' pre-active teaching and practical theories of teaching science: Multiple case studies from Turkey. Unpublished EdD thesis, Nottingham University, Nottingham.
  • Ersoy, Y. (1995). Continuing education of maths teachers toward the information era. Paper presented at the Ma TEI.
  • Fullan, M. G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change (2nd ed.). London: Cassell.
  • Fullan, M. G. (1992). Successful school improvement: The implementation perspective and beyond. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Gursimsek, I., Kaptan, F., & Erkan, S. (1997). General view of teacher education policies of Turkey. Paper presented at the 49th AACTE Annual Meeting, Phoenix, AZ.
  • Hewson, P. W., & Hewson, M. G. A. B. (1989). Analysis and use of a task for identifying conceptions of teaching science. Journal of Education for Teaching, 15(3), 191209.
  • Higher Education Council.(1998, March). Egitim Fakulteleri Ogretmen Yetistirme Programlarinin Yeniden Duzenlenmesi. Ankara.
  • Higher Education Council.(1999, March). Turk Yuksekogretiminin Bugunku Durumu. Ankara.
  • Irez, S. (2002). The use of critical reflective approach to enhance prospective science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A rationale and review of strategies. Unpublished doctoral assignment, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham.
  • Irez, O. S. (2004). Turkish preservice science teacher educators' beliefs about the nature of science and conceptualisations of science education. Unpublished EdD thesis, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham.
  • Jenkins, E. W. (1997). Scientific and technological literacy for citizenship: What can we learn from the research and other evidence. In S.Sjoberg & E.Kallerud (Eds.), Science, technology and citizenship: The public understanding of science and technology in science education and research policy (pp. 2950)Oslo: Norwegian Institute for Studies in Research and Higher Education.
  • Johnston, A. T. (2001). A conceptual change analysis of the nature of science conceptions: The deep roots and entangled vines of a conceptual ecology. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, The University of Utah.
  • King, B. B. (1991). Beginning teachers' knowledge of and attitude toward history and philosophy of science. Science Education, 75(1), 135141.
  • Kucukahmet, L. (1986). Teacher education in Turkey. European Journal of Teacher Education, 9(1), 3336.
  • Lakin, S., & Wellington, J. (1994). Who will teach the ‘nature of science’?: Teachers' views of science and their implications for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 16(2), 175190.
  • Lanier, J. E., & Little, J. W. (1986). Research on teacher education. In M. C.Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 527569)New York: Macmillan.
  • Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331359.
  • Lederman, N. G., & O'Malley, M. (1990). Students' perceptions of tentativeness in science: Development, use, and sources of change. Science Education, 74(2), 225239.
  • Lederman, N. G., & Zeidler, D. L. (1987). Science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: Do they really influence teacher behavior? Science Education, 71(5), 721734.
  • McComas, W. F. (1998). The principal elements of the nature of science: Dispelling the myths. In W. F.McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 5370)Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Almozroa, H. (1998). The role and character of the nature of science in science education. In W. F.McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 339) Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • McComas, W. F., & Olson, J. K. (1998). The nature of science in international science education standards documents. In W. F.McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 4152) Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Meichtry, Y. J. (1999). The nature of science and scientific knowledge: Implications for a preservice elementary methods course. Science & Education, 8, 273286.
  • Mellado, V. (1997). Preservice teachers' classroom practice and their conceptions of the nature of science. Science & Education, 6, 331354.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Mueller, C. L., & Wavering, M. J. (1999, January). Science interns' beliefs about the nature of science and teaching. Paper presented at the Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Austin, TX.
  • Murcia, K., & Schibeci, R. (1999). Primary student teachers' conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(11), 11231140.
  • Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nott, M., & Wellington, J. (1998). Eliciting, interpreting and developing teachers' understandings of the nature of science. Science & Education, 7(6), 579594.
  • Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What ‘ideas-about-science’ should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692720.
  • Pomeroy, D. (1993). Implications of teachers' beliefs about the nature of science: Comparison of the beliefs of scientists, secondary science teachers, and elementary teachers. Science Education, 77, 261278.
  • Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J.Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 102119) New York: Macmillan.
  • Royal Society. (1985). Science is for everybody: Summary report. London: The Royal Society.
  • Ryder, J. (2001, April). Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy: Implications for school science education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Seattle, WA.
  • Schwartz, R. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2002). ‘It's the nature of beast’: The influence of knowledge and intentions on learning and teaching nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 205236.
  • Smith, D. C., & Anderson, C. W. (1999). Appropriating scientific practices and discourses with future elementary teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(7), 755776.
  • Smith, M. U., Lederman, N. G., Bell, R. L., McComas, W. F., & Clough, M. P. (1997). How great is the disagreement about the nature of science: A response to Alters. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(10), 11011103.
  • Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. J. (1997). Beliefs about the nature of science and the enacted science curriculum. Science & Education, 6, 355371.
  • Tsai, C.-C. (2002). Nested epistemologies: Science teachers' beliefs of teaching, learning and science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 771783.
  • Turkmen, L., & Bonstetter, R. (1998). Inclusion of the nature of science in Turkish science education curriculum (K-11): As a different approach. Science Education International, 9(4), 1519.
  • Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54(2), 143178.
  • Wideen, M. F., & Grimmet, P. P. (1997). Exploring futures in initial teacher education: The landscape and the quest. In A.Hudson & D.Lambert (Eds.), Exploring futures in initial teacher education (pp. 342) London: Institute of Education, University of London.
  • Yalvac, B., & Crawford, B. A. (2002, January). Eliciting prospective science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science in Middle East Technical University (METU), in Ankara. Paper presented at the Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Charlotte, NC.
  • Zeichner, K. M., & Tabachnick, B. R. (1985). The development of teacher perspectives: Social strategies and institutional control in the socialization of beginning teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 11(1), 125.