SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Baram-Tsabari, A., & Yarden, A. (2005). Characterizing children's spontaneous interests in science and technology. International Journal of Science Education, 27(7), 803826.
  • Biddulph, F., Symington, D., & Osborne, J. (1986). The place of children's questions in primary science education. Research in Science & Technological Education, 4(1), 7788.
  • Bilal, D. (2004). Research on children's information seeking on the Web. In M. K.Chelton & C.Cool (Eds.), Youth information-seeking behavior: Theories, models, and issues (pp. 271291). Lanham, MD: The Scarecrow Press.
  • Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (1993). Developing biological literacy: A guide to developing secondary and post-secondary biology curricula (B. S. C. Study, Trans.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
  • Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals (19th ed., Vol. 1). New York: David McKay.
  • Blumenfeld, P., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369398.
  • Brem, S. K., & Boyes, A. J. (2000). Using critical thinking to conduct effective searches of online resources. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(7), retrieved February 13, 2006, from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v = 2007&n = 2007.
  • Brill, G., & Yarden, A. (2003). Learning biology through research papers: A stimulus for question-asking by high-school students. Cell Biology Education, 2, 266274.
  • Burke, C., & Grosvenor, I. (2003). The school I'd like: Children and young people's reflections on an education for the 21st century. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Busch, H. (2005). Is science education relevant? Europhysics News, September/October, 162167.
  • Chin, C., Brown, D. E., & Bruce, B. C. (2002). Student-generated questions: A meaningful aspect of learning in science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 521549.
  • Chin, C., & Chia, L.-G. (2004). Problem-based learning: Using students' questions to drive knowledge construction. Science Education, 88, 707727.
  • Ching, C. C., Kafai, Y. B., & Marshall, S. K. (2000). Spaces for change: Gender and technology access in collaborative software design. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9(1), 6778.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Hermanson, K. (1995). Intrinsic motivation in museums: Why does one want to learn? In J. H.Falk & L. D.Dierking (Eds.), Public institutions for personal learning: Establishing a research agenda (pp. 6777). Washington, DC: American Association of Museums.
  • Daiute, C. (1997). Youth genre in the classroom: Can children's and teachers' cultures meet? In J.Flood, S. B.Heath, & D.Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts (pp. 323333). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Dawson, C. (2000). Upper primary boys' and girls' interests in science: Have they changed since 1980? International Journal of Science Education, 22(6), 557570.
  • Deci, E. L. (1992). The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: A self-determination theory perspective. In K. A.Renninger, S.Hidi, & A.Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 4370). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Dillon, J. T. (1984). The classification of research questions. Review of Educational Research, 54(3), 327361.
  • Dillon, J. T. (1988). The remedial status of student questioning. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20(3), 197210.
  • Dori, Y. J., & Herscovitz, O. (1999). Question-posing capability as an alternative evaluation method: Analysis of an environmental case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(4), 411430.
  • Economic and Social Research Council. (2004). ESRC network project: Consulting pupils about teaching and learning. Available at: http://www.consultingpupils.co.uk/ [accessed on June 14, 2004].
  • Falchetti, E., Caravita, S., & Sperduti, A. (2003). What lay people want to know from scientists: An analysis of the data base of “scienzaonline” Paper presented at the 4th ESERA Conference, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands.
  • Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2002). Lessons without limit: how free-choice learning is transforming education. Walnut Creek, CA: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Fallik, O., Eylon, B.-S., & Rosenfeld, S. (submitted). Motivating teachers to enact free-choice PBL in science and technology (PBLSAT): Effects of a professional development model.
  • Fidel, R., Davies, R. K., Douglass, M. H., Holder, J. K., Hopkins, C. J., Kushner, E. J., Miyagishima, B. K., & Toney, C. D. (1999). A visit to the information mall: Web searching behavior of high school students. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(1), 2437.
  • Friedler, Y., & Tamir, P. (1990). Sex differences in science education in Israel: An analysis of 15 years of research. Research in Science and Technological Education, 8(1), 2134.
  • Gallas, K. (1995). Talking their way into science: Hearing children's questions and theories, responding with curricula. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Gardner, P. L. (1975). Attitudes to science: A review. Studies in Science Education, 2, 141.
  • Gardner, P. L. (1998). The development of males' and females' interests in science and technology. In L.Hoffmann, A. K.Krapp, A.Renninger, & J.Baumert (Eds.), Seeon conference on interest and gender (pp. 4157). Kiel, Germany: IPN.
  • Gardner, P. L., Penna, C., & Brass, K. (1996). Technology education in the post-compulsory years. In P. J.Fensham (Ed.), Science and technology education in the post compulsory years (pp. 140192). Melbourne: ACER.
  • Graesser, A. C., Person, N., & Huber, J. (1992). Mechanisms that generate questions. In T. W.Lauer, E.Peacock, & A. C.Graesser (Eds.), Questions and information systems (pp. 167187). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 104137.
  • Greenfield, T. A. (1998). Gender- and grade-level differences in science interest and participation. Science Education, 81(3), 259276.
  • Gross, M. (2001). Imposed information seeking in public libraries and school library media centres: A common behaviour? Information Research, 6(2). Available at: http://InformationR.net/ir/6-2/paper100.html.
  • Hidi, S., & Anderson, V. (1992). Situational interest and its impact on reading and expository writing. In K. A.Renninger, S.Hidi, & A.Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 215238). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Hirsh, S. G. (1999). Children's relevance criteria and information seeking on electronic resources. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(14), 12651283.
  • Hoffman, J. L., & Krajcik, J. S. (1999). Assessing the nature of learners' science content understandings as a result of utilizing on-line resources. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, MA.
  • Hoffmann, L., & Haussler, P. (1998). An intervention project promoting girls; and boys' interest in physics. In L.Hoffmann, A. K.Krapp, A.Renninger, & J.Baumert (Eds.), Seeon conference on interest and gender (pp. 301316). Kiel, Germany: IPN.
  • Janes, J., Hill, C., & Rolfe, A. (2001). Ask-an-expert services analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(13), 11061121.
  • Jenkins, E. W., & Nelson, N. W. (2005). Important but not for me: Students' attitudes towards secondary school science in England. Research in Science & Technological Education, 23(1), 4157.
  • Jones, G. M., Howe, A., & Rua, M. J. (2000). Gender differences in students' experiences, interests, and attitudes toward science and scientists. Science Education, 84(2), 180192.
  • Kafai, Y. B., & Sutton, S. (1999). Elementary school students' computer and Internet use at home: Current trends and issues. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 21(3), 345362.
  • Kahle, J. B., & Lakes, M. K. (1983). The myth of equality in science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(2), 131140.
  • Keating, T., MaKinster, J., Mills, J., & Nowak, J. (1999). Characterization and analysis of a science curricular resource on the World Wide Web: The cyber history of Bernoulli's principle (CRTL Technical Report 10-99). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
  • Krapp, A. (2000). Interest and human development during adolescence: An educational-psychological approach. In J.Heckhausen (Ed.), Motivational psychology of human development (pp. 109128). London: Elsevier.
  • Krapp, A. (2002). An educational-psychological theory of interest and its relation to SDT. In E. L.Deci & R. M.Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 405426). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester.
  • Lankes, R. D. (1999). Ask-A's lesson learned from K-12 digital reference services. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 38(1), 6371.
  • Leong, S. C., & Al-Hawamdeh, S. (1999). Gender and learning attitudes in using Web-based science lessons. Information Research, 5(1). Available at: http://informationr.net/ir/5-1/paper66.html.
  • Lloyd-Smith, M., & Tarr, J. (2000). Researching children's perspectives: A sociological dimension. In A.Lewis & G.Lindsay (Eds.), Researching children's perspectives (pp. 5970). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
  • Lumpe, A. T., & Bulter, K. (2002). The information seeking strategies of high school science students. Research in Science Education, 32, 549566.
  • MaKinster, J., Beghetto, R., & Plucker, J. (2002). Why can't I find Newton's third law? Case studies of students' use of the Web as a science resource. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(2), 155172.
  • Marascuilo, L. A., & McSweeney, M. (1977). Nonparametric and distribution-free methods for the social sciences. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Marbach-Ad, G., & Sokolove, P. G. (2000). Can undergraduate biology students learn to ask higher level questions? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 854870.
  • Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King's College.
  • Mirta, D. L. (2004). The significance of students: Can increasing “student voice” in schools lead to gains in youth development? Teachers College Record, 106(4), 651688.
    Direct Link:
  • Murray, I., & Reiss, M. (2005). The student review of the science curriculum. School Science Review, 87(318), 8393.
  • Na-Demo-Ya. (2002). English name gender finder. NaDemoYa ePublishing. Available at: http://epublishing.nademoya.biz/japan/names_in_english.php?nid=A [accessed on April 20, 2005].
  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2005). Internet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms: 1994–2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
  • National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Science Foundation. (2000). Science and engineering indicators 2000. Available at: http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/seind00/start.htm [accessed on June 6, 2004].
  • Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, reservations, or promise? A media effect model for public perceptions of science and technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584608.
  • Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2000). Pupils' and parents' views of the school science curriculum. London: King's College.
  • Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils' views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441467.
  • Parslow, G. R., & Wood, E. J. (1998). Miscellaneous bytes. Biochemical Education, 26, 224227.
  • Pedrosa de Jesus, H., Teixeira-Dias, J. J. C., & Watts, M. (2003). Questions of chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 25(8), 10151034.
  • Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
  • Pomerantz, J., Nicholson, S., Belanger, Y., & Lankes, R. D. (2004). The current state of digital reference: Validation of a general digital reference model through a survey of digital reference services. Information Processing & Management, 40(2), 347363.
  • Prenzel, M. (1998). Interest research concerning the upper secondary level, college, and vocational education: An overview. In L.Hoffmann, A. K.Krapp, A.Renninger, & J.Baumert (Eds.), Seeon conference on interest and gender (pp. 355366). Kiel, Germany: IPN.
  • Qualter, A. (1993). I would like to know more about that: A study of the interest shown by girls and boys in scientific topics. International Journal of Science Education, 15(3), 307317.
  • Rop, C. J. (2003). Spontaneous inquiry questions in high school chemistry classrooms: Perceptions of a group of motivated learners. International Journal of Science Education, 25(1), 1333.
  • Rudduck, J., & Flutter, J. (2000). Pupil participation and pupil perspective: “Carving a new order of experience” Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(1), 7589.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 5467.
  • Ryder, J., Leach, J., & Driver, R. (1999). Undergraduate science students' images of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(2), 201219.
  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1992). Text-based and knowledge-based questioning by children. Cognition and Instruction, 9(3), 177199.
  • Schacter, J., Chung, G. K. W. K., & Dorr, A. E. (1998). Children's Internet searching on complex problems: Performance and process analyses. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(9), 840849.
  • Schiefele, U. (1998). Individual interest and learning—What we know and what we don't know. In L.Hoffmann, A. K.Krapp, A.Renninger, & J.Baumert (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seeon conference on interest and gender (pp. 91104). Kiel, Germany: IPN.
  • Schiefele, U., Krapp, A., & Winteler, A. (1992). Interest as a predictor of academic achievement: A meta-analysis of research. In K. A.Renninger, S.Hidi, & A.Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 183212). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Seiler, G. (2001). Reversing the “standard” direction: Science emerging from the lives of African American students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(9), 10001014.
  • Shashaani, L. (1994). Gender-differences in computer experience and its influence on computer attitudes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11(4), 347367.
  • Shemesh, M. (1990). Gender-related differences in reasoning skills and learning interests of junior high school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(1), 2734.
  • Shepardson, D. P., & Pizzini, E. L. (1991). Questioning levels of junior high school science textbooks and their implications for learning textual information. Science Education, 75(6), 673682.
  • Simpson, R. D., & Oliver, J. S. (1985). Attitude toward science and achievement motivation profiles of male and female science students in grades six through ten. Science Education, 69(4), 511526.
  • Sjøberg, S. (2000). Science and scientists: The SAS study. University of Oslo. Available at: http://folk.uio.no/sveinsj/SASweb.htm [accessed on April 23, 2004].
  • Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2002). ROSE handbook: Introduction, guidelines and underlying ideas. University of Oslo. Available at: http://folk.uio.no/sveinsj/ROSE%20handbook.htm [accessed on March 11, 2004].
  • Stark, R., & Gray, D. (1999). Gender preferences in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(6), 633643.
  • Taber, K. S. (1991). Gender differences in science preferences on starting secondary school. Research in Science & Technological Education, 9(2), 245251.
  • Tamir, P., & Gardner, P. L. (1989). The structure of interest in high school biology. Research in Science & Technological Education, 7(2), 113140.
  • The National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century. (2000). Before it's too late: A report to the nation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
  • Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The Academic Motivation Scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 10031017.
  • Wallace, R. M., Kupperman, J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2000). Science on the Web: Students online in a sixth-grade classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(1), 75104.
  • Walter, C., & Westbrook, V. (2001). Supporting systemic school science education reform in partnership with free-choice science learning: A Texas case study. In J. H.Falk (Ed.), Free-choice science education: How we learn science outside of school (pp. 174185). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Watson, J. S. (2004). “If you don't have it, you can't find i”: A close look at students' perceptions of using technology. In M. K.Chelton & C.Cool (Eds.), Youth information-seeking behavior: Theories, models, and issues (pp. 145180). Lanham, MD: The Scarecrow Press.
  • Watts, M., Gould, G., & Alsop, S. (1997). Questions of understanding: Categorising pupils' questions in science. School Science Review, 79(286), 5763.
  • Weigold, M. F., & Treise, D. (2004). Attracting teen surfers to science Web sites. Public Understanding of Science, 13(3), 229248.
  • White, M. D. (1999). Analyzing electronic question/answer services: Framework and evaluations of selected services. CLIS Technical Report no. 99-02.
  • White, R., & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing understanding. London: The Falmer Press.
  • Whitehead, J., & Clough, N. (2004). Pupils, the forgotten partners in education action zones. Journal of Education Policy, 19(2), 215227.
  • Zohar, A. (2003). Her physics, his physics: Gender issues in Israeli advanced placement physics classes. International Journal of Science Education, 25(2), 245268.