SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Bavelas, J., & Chovil, N. (2000). Visible acts of meaning. An integrated message model of language in face-to-face dialogue. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19, 163194.
  • Bavelas, J. B., Chovil, N., Coates, L., & Roe, L. (1995). Gestures specialized for dialogue. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 394405.
  • Derrida, J. (1988). Limited inc. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Duranti, A. (1985). Sociocultural dimensions of discourse. In Teun A.van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis: Disciplines of discourse (Vol. 1, pp. 193230). London: Academic Press.
  • Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (1992). Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Givry, D., & Roth, W.-M. (in press). Toward a new conception of conceptions: Interplay of talk, gestures, and structures in the setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
  • Goldin-Meadow, S. (2000). Beyond words: The importance of gesture to researchers and learners. Child Development, 71, 231239.
  • Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gestures: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Goldin-Meadow, S. (2004). Gesture's role in the learning process. Theory into Practice, 43, 314321.
  • Goldin-Meadow, S., Kim, S., & Singer, M. (1999). What the teacher's hands tell the student's mind about math. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 720730.
  • Goldin-Meadow, S., & Wagner, S. M. (2005). How our hands help us learn. Trends in Cognitive Science 9, 234241.
  • Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interactions between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.
  • Goodwin, C. (1995). Seeing in depth. Social Studies of Science, 25, 237274.
  • Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Beverly Hill, CA: Sage.
  • Hanks, W. F. (1990). Referential practice: Language and lived space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Haviland, J. B. (1993). Anchoring, iconicity, and orientation in Guugu Yimithirr pointing gestures. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 3, 345.
  • Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 39103.
  • Kendon, A. (1997). Gesture. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26, 109128.
  • Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. London: Continuum.
  • Lemke, J. L. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R.Martin & R.Veel (Eds.), Reading science (pp. 87113). London: Routledge.
  • Limon, M., & Mason, L. (2002). Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • McNeill, D. (2002). Gesture and language dialectic. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 34, 737.
  • Ochs, E., Gonzales, P., & Jacoby, S. (1996). “When I come down I'm in the domain state.” Grammar and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physicists. In E.Ochs, E. A.Schegloff, & S. A.Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 328369). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pozzer-Ardenghi, L., & Roth, W.-M. (2005). Photographs in lectures: Gestures as meaning-making resources. Linguistics & Education, 15, 275293.
  • Roth, W.-M. (2000). From gesture to scientific language. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 16831714.
  • Roth, W.-M. (2002). Gestures: Their role in teaching and learning. Review of Educational Research, 71, 365392.
  • Roth, W.-M. (2003a). From epistemic (ergotic) actions to scientific discourse: Do gestures obtain a bridging function? Pragmatics & Cognition, 11, 139168.
  • Roth, W.-M. (2003b). Gesture-speech phenomena, learning and development. Educational Psychologist, 38, 249263.
  • Roth, W.-M. (2004). Perceptual gestalts in workplace communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 10371069.
  • Roth, W.-M. (2006). Learning science: A singular plural perspective. Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
  • Roth, W.-M., & Lawless, D. (2002a). When up is down and down is up: Body orientation, proximity and gestures as resources for listeners. Language in Society, 31, 128.
  • Roth, W.-M., & Lawless, D. (2002b). Signs, deixis, and the emergency of scientific explanations. Semiotica, 138, 95130.
  • Roth, W.-M., & Pozzer-Ardenghi, L. (2006). Tracking situated, distributed, and embodied communication in real time. In M. A.Vanchevsky (Ed.), Focus on cognitive psychology research. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
  • Roth, W.-M., & Tobin, K. (1996). Aristotle and natural observation versus Galileo and scientific experiment: An analysis of lectures in physics for elementary teachers in terms of discourse and inscriptions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 135157.
  • Roth, W.-M., Tobin, K., & Shaw, K. (1997). Cascades of inscriptions and the re-presentation of nature: How numbers, tables, graphs, and money come to re-present a rolling ball. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 10751091.
  • Roth, W.-M., & Welzel, M. (2001). From activity to gestures and scientific language. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 103136.
  • Schoultz, J., Säljö, R., & Wyndhamn, J. (2001). Heavenly talk: Discourse, artifacts, and children's understanding of elementary astronomy. Human Development, 44, 103118.
  • Singer, M. A., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Children learn when their teachers' gestures and speech differ. Psychological Science, 16, 8589.
    Direct Link:
  • Snow, R. E. (1992). Aptitude theory: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Educational Psychologist, 27, 532.
  • Snow, R. E. (1997). Aptitudes and symbol systems in adaptive classroom teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 354360.
  • Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535585.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Watson, G., & Seiler, R. M. (Eds.). (1992). Text in context: Contributions to ethnomethodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.