SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCE

  • Adey, P. (with Hewitt, G., Hewitt, J., & Landau, N.). (2004). The professional development of teachers: Practice and theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Ash, D., & Klein, C. (2000). Inquiry in the informal learning environment. In J.Minstrell & E. H.van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in Science Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
  • Astor-Jack, T., Balcerzak, P., & McCallie, E. (2006). Professional development and the historical traditions of informal science institutions: Views of four providers. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 6(1), 6781.
  • Astor-Jack, T., Whaley, K., Dierking, L., Perry, D., & Garibay, C. (in press). Investigating Socially-Mediated Learning. In J. H.Falk, L. D.Dierking, & S.Foutz (Eds.), In principle, in practice: Museums as learning institutions. Lanham, MD: Alta Mira Press.
  • Bailey, A. (1988). Ending science illiteracy: Teaching teachers to teach science. Museum News, 66(5), 5053.
  • Ball, D., & Cohen, D. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional development. In L.Darling-Hammond & G.Sykes (Ed.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 332). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Beetlestone, J., Johnson, C., Quin, M., & White, H. (1998). The science center movement: Contexts, practice, next challenges. Public Understanding of Science, 7, 526.
  • Bell, B., & Gilbert, J. (1994). Teacher development as professional, personal, and social development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(5), 483497.
  • Bell, B., & Gilbert, J. (1996). Teacher development: A model from science education. Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.
  • Birman, B., Desimone, L., Porter, A., & Garet, M. (2000). Designing professional development that works. Educational Leadership, 57(8), 2833.
  • Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Chin, C. (2004). Museum experience—A resource for science teacher education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, 6390.
  • Cohen, D., & Hill, H. (1998). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California (RR-39). Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
  • Danilov, V. (1980). Science and technology centers. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 591596.
  • Drago-Severson, E. (1994). What does “staff development” develop? How the staff development literature conceives of adult growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
  • Falk, J., & Dierking, L. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
  • Fontana, A., & Frey, J. (2000). The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In N.Denzin & Y.Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 645672). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligencer reframed. NY: Basic Books.
  • Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915945.
  • Gess-Newsome, J. (2001). The professional development of science teachers for science education reform: A review of the research. In J.Rhoton & P.Bowers (Eds.), Professional development: Planning and design Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
  • Gillies, R., & Ashman, A. (2003). Co-operative learning: The social and intellectual outcomes of learning in Groups. Falmer, NY: Routledge.
  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
  • Gonzales, P., Guzman, J., Partelow, L., Pahlke, E., Jocelyn, L., Kastberg, D., & Williams, T. (2004). Highlights from the trends in international mathematics and science study: TIMSS 2003. Washington DC: NCES.
  • Gooding, J. (1979). Using museums in in-service education. British Journal of In-Service Education, 5(2), 5253.
  • Goodnough, K. (2001). Enhancing professional knowledge: A case study of an elementary teacher. Canadian Journal of Education, 26(2), 218236.
  • Grinell, S. (1988). Science centers come of age. Issues in Science and Technology, 4(3), 7075.
  • Guskey, T. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Guskey, T., & Peterson, K. (1996). The road to classroom change. Educational Leadership, 53(4), 1014.
  • Hodgson, J. (1986). Teaching teachers: Museums team up with schools and universities. Museum News, 64(5), 2835.
  • Huberman, M., & Miles, M. (1984). Innovation up close: How school improvement works. New York: Plenum.
  • Jeanpierre, B., Oberhauser, K., & Freeman, C. (2005). Characteristics of professional development that effect change in secondary science teachers' classroom practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 668690.
  • Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1995). Student achievement through staff development: Fundamentals of school renewal. (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
  • Kelly, J. (2000). Rethinking the elementary science methods course: A case for content, pedagogy, and informal science education. International Journal of Science Education, 27(7), 755777.
  • Klein, C. (2005). Gaps and overlaps in professional development among CISTL partners: An analysis of baseline data from summer 2003 through spring 2004. The St. Louis Center for Inquiry in Science Teaching and Learning white paper.
  • Kvale, S. (1996) InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Loucks-Horsley, K., Hewson, P., Love, N., & Stiles, S. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Loucks-Horsley, S., & Matsumoto, C. (1999). Research on professional development for teachers of mathematics and science: The state of the scene. School Science and Mathematics, 99(5), 258271.
  • Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2003). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 370391.
  • Luft, J. (2001). Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: The impact of an inquiry-based professional development programme on beginning and experienced secondary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 517534.
  • Martinello, M., & Gonzalez, M. (1987). The university gallery as a field setting for teacher education. The Journal of Museum Education, 12(3), 301309.
  • Mays, N., & Pope, C. (1995). Qualitative research: Rigour and qualitative research. British Medical Journal, 3(11), 109112.
  • McCullum, P. (2000). 6 points of a partnership. Journal of Staff Development, 21(2), 39.
  • Middlebrooks, S. (1999). Preparing tomorrow's teachers: Preservice partnerships between science museums and colleges. Washington, DC: ASTC.
  • Mundry, S., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (1999). Designing effective professional development: Decision points and dilemmas. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
  • Mundry, S., Spector, B., Stiles, K., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (1999). Working toward a continuum of professional learning experiences for teachers of science and mathematics. Research monograph no. 17. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, National Institute for Science Education.
  • National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Olson, J., Cox-Peterson, A., & McComas, W. (2001). The inclusion of informal environments in science teacher preparation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12(3), 155173.
  • Paris, S. (1997). Situated motivation and informal learning. Journal of Museum Education, 22(2/3), 2226.
  • Ramey-Gassert, L., Walberg III, H., & Walberg, H. (1994). Reexamining connections: Museums as science learning environments. Science Education, 78(4), 354363.
  • Rowe, S. (2002). The role of objects in active, distributed meaning-making. In S.Paris (Ed.), Perspectives on object-centered learning in museums (pp. 1935). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Rynes, S., Bartunek, J., & Daft, R. (2001). Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 340.
  • Smith, W., McLaughlin, E., & Tunnicliffe, S. (1998). Effect on primary level students of in-service education in an informal science setting. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9(2), 123142.
  • Smith, J., Smith, L., & De Lisi, R. (2001). Natural classroom assessment: Designing seamless instruction & assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Sparks, D., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (1989). Five models of staff development for teachers. Journal of Staff Development, 10(4), 4057.
  • St. John, M. (1990). First hand learning: Teacher education in science museums (Vols. 1 and 2). Unpublished manuscript, Washington, DC.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Strong, R., Silver, H., & Perini, J. (2001). Making students as important as standards. Educational Leadership, 59(3), 5661.
  • Sweeney, J., & Lynds, S. (2001). Reform and museums: Enhancing science education in formal and informal settings. In J.Rhoton & P.Bowers (Eds.), Professional development leadership and the diverse learning Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
  • Wiggins, G. (1996). Practicing what we preach in designing authentic assessments? Educational Leadership, 54(4), 1825.
  • Yoshida, M. (1999). Lesson study: A case study of a Japanese approach to improving instruction through school-based teacher development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.