SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Barbara Schneider, Joseph Krajcik, Jari Lavonen, Katariina Salmela-Aro, Michael Broda, Justina Spicer, Justin Bruner, Julia Moeller, Janna Linnansaari, Kalle Juuti, Jaana Viljaranta, Investigating optimal learning moments in U.S. and finnish science classes, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2016, 53, 3
  2. 2
    Donna Farland-Smith, Innovative Professional Development Methods and Strategies for STEM Education, 2016,

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Donna Farland-Smith, Toni Ledger, Handbook of Research on Applied Learning Theory and Design in Modern Education, 2016,

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Soo Yeon Shin, Loran Carleton Parker, Omolola Adedokun, Ann Mennonno, Amy Wackerly, Sandra San Miguel, Changes in Elementary Student Perceptions of Science, Scientists, and Science Careers After Participating in a Curricular Module on Health and Veterinary Science, School Science and Mathematics, 2015, 115, 6
  5. 5
    Amanda B. Diekman, Erica S. Weisgram, Aimee L. Belanger, New Routes to Recruiting and Retaining Women in STEM: Policy Implications of a Communal Goal Congruity Perspective, Social Issues and Policy Review, 2015, 9, 1
  6. You have free access to this content6
    Louise Archer, Jennifer DeWitt, Beatrice Willis, Adolescent boys' science aspirations: Masculinity, capital, and power, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2014, 51, 1
  7. 7
    Chanho Yang, Jae-Sung Park, Yu-Jin Kim, Taehee Noh, An Analysis of Gender-Role Stereotype in the Illustrations of Middle School Science Textbooks Developed under the 2009 Revised National Curriculum, Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 2014, 58, 2, 210

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Yael M. Bamberger, Encouraging Girls into Science and Technology with Feminine Role Model: Does This Work?, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2014, 23, 4, 549

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Catherine Riegle-Crumb, Chelsea Moore, The Gender Gap in High School Physics: Considering the Context of Local Communities, Social Science Quarterly, 2014, 95, 1
  10. 10
    Louise Archer, Jennifer DeWitt, Jonathan Osborne, Justin Dillon, Beatrice Willis, Billy Wong, ‘Not girly, not sexy, not glamorous’: primary school girls’ and parents’ constructions of science aspirations1, Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 2013, 21, 1, 171

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    Fredrik Jensen, Jørgen Sjaastad, A NORWEGIAN OUT-OF-SCHOOL MATHEMATICS PROJECT’S INFLUENCE ON SECONDARY STUDENTS’ STEM MOTIVATION, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2013, 11, 6, 1437

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Jørgen Sjaastad, Measuring the Ways Significant Persons Influence Attitudes Towards Science and Mathematics, International Journal of Science Education, 2013, 35, 2, 192

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Jennifer DeWitt, Louise Archer, Jonathan Osborne, Nerdy, Brainy and Normal: Children’s and Parents’ Constructions of Those Who Are Highly Engaged with Science, Research in Science Education, 2013, 43, 4, 1455

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Chris Gunter, Science: it's a role model thing, Genome Biology, 2013, 14, 2, 105

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Roxanne M. Hughes, Brandon Nzekwe, Kristen J. Molyneaux, The Single Sex Debate for Girls in Science: a Comparison Between Two Informal Science Programs on Middle School Students’ STEM Identity Formation, Research in Science Education, 2013, 43, 5, 1979

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Katalin Szelényi, Nida Denson, Karen Kurotsuchi Inkelas, Women in STEM Majors and Professional Outcome Expectations: The Role of Living-Learning Programs and Other College Environments, Research in Higher Education, 2013, 54, 8, 851

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Louise Archer, Jennifer DeWitt, Jonathan Osborne, Justin Dillon, Beatrice Willis, Billy Wong, “Balancing acts'': Elementary school girls' negotiations of femininity, achievement, and science, Science Education, 2012, 96, 6
  18. 18
    Nicole Archard, Developing Future Women Leaders: The Importance of Mentoring and Role Modeling in the Girls’ School Context, Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 2012, 20, 4, 451

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    Joanna Sikora, Artur Pokropek, Intergenerational Transfers of Preferences for Science Careers in Comparative Perspective, International Journal of Science Education, 2012, 34, 16, 2501

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    Donna Farland-Smith, Personal and Social Interactions Between Young Girls and Scientists: Examining Critical Aspects for Identity Construction, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2012, 23, 1, 1

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    Jørgen Sjaastad, Sources of Inspiration: The role of significant persons in young people's choice of science in higher education, International Journal of Science Education, 2012, 34, 10, 1615

    CrossRef

  22. 22
    CHRISTINE CHARYTON, JOHN O. ELLIOTT, MOHAMMED A. RAHMAN, JENESS L. WOODARD, SAMANTHA DeDIOS, Gender and Science: Women Nobel Laureates, The Journal of Creative Behavior, 2011, 45, 3
  23. 23
    Maria Vetleseter Bøe, Ellen Karoline Henriksen, Terry Lyons, Camilla Schreiner, Participation in science and technology: young people’s achievement-related choices in late-modern societies, Studies in Science Education, 2011, 47, 1, 37

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    Katalin Szelényi, Karen Kurotsuchi Inkelas, The Role of Living–Learning Programs in Women’s Plans to Attend Graduate School in STEM Fields, Research in Higher Education, 2011, 52, 4, 349

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    Catherine Riegle-Crumb, Chelsea Moore, Aida Ramos-Wada, Who wants to have a career in science or math? exploring adolescents' future aspirations by gender and race/ethnicity, Science Education, 2011, 95, 3