SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Brian Hand, Lori A. Norton-Meier, Murat Gunel, Recai Akkus, Aligning Teaching to Learning: A 3-Year Study Examining the Embedding of Language and Argumentation into Elementary Science Classrooms, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2015,

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Sungho Kim, Brian Hand, An Analysis of Argumentation Discourse Patterns in Elementary Teachers’ Science Classroom Discussions, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2015, 26, 3, 221

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Mehmet C. Ayar, Mehmet Aydeniz, Bugrahan Yalvac, ANALYZING SCIENCE ACTIVITIES IN FORCE AND MOTION CONCEPTS: A DESIGN OF AN IMMERSION UNIT, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2015, 13, 1, 95

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Terri Patchen, Dennis W. Smithenry, More Than Just Chemistry: The Impact of a Collaborative Participant Structure on Student Perceptions of Science, Research in Science Education, 2015, 45, 1, 75

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Matthew J. Benus, Morgan B. Yarker, Brian M. Hand, Lori A. Norton-Meier, STEM Education: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, 2015,

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Nicole A. Shea, Ravit Golan Duncan, Celeste Stephenson, A Tri-part Model for Genetics Literacy: Exploring Undergraduate Student Reasoning About Authentic Genetics Dilemmas, Research in Science Education, 2014,

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Sunyoung Park, Aeran Choi, Analysis of Student Science Writing and Perception on Argument-Based Claim and Evidence Writing Approach, Journal of The Korean Association For Research In Science Education, 2014, 34, 8, 787

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Ellice A. Forman, Michael J. Ford, Authority and accountability in light of disciplinary practices in science, International Journal of Educational Research, 2014, 64, 199

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Terri Patchen, Dennis W. Smithenry, Diversifying instruction and shifting authority: A cultural historical activity theory (CHAT) analysis of classroom participant structures, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2014, 51, 5
  10. 10
    ROSEMARY S. RUSS, Epistemology of Science vs. Epistemology for Science, Science Education, 2014, 98, 3
  11. 11
    CRISTINA SIN, Epistemology, Sociology, and Learning and Teaching in Physics, Science Education, 2014, 98, 2
  12. 12
    DAVID STROUPE, Examining Classroom Science Practice Communities: How Teachers and Students Negotiate Epistemic Agency and Learn Science-as-Practice, Science Education, 2014, 98, 3
  13. 13
    Aeran Choi, Brian Hand, Lori Norton-Meier, Grade 5 Students’ Online Argumentation about Their In-Class Inquiry Investigations, Research in Science Education, 2014, 44, 2, 267

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Xenia Meyer, Productive disciplinary engagement as a recursive process: Initial engagement in a scientific investigation as a resource for deeper engagement in the scientific discipline, International Journal of Educational Research, 2014, 64, 184

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Tom G. K. Bryce, Stephen P. Day, Scepticism and doubt in science and science education: the complexity of global warming as a socio-scientific issue, Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2014, 9, 3, 599

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Shu-Sheng Lin, SCIENCE AND NON-SCIENCE UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS’ CRITICAL THINKING AND ARGUMENTATION PERFORMANCE IN READING A SCIENCE NEWS REPORT, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2014, 12, 5, 1023

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Jonathan Osborne, Teaching Scientific Practices: Meeting the Challenge of Change, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2014, 25, 2, 177

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Andri Christodoulou, Jonathan Osborne, The science classroom as a site of epistemic talk: A case study of a teacher's attempts to teach science based on argument, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2014, 51, 10
  19. 19
    Jiwon Shin, Aeran Choi, Trends in Research Studies on Scientific Argument and Writing in Korea, Journal of The Korean Association For Research In Science Education, 2014, 34, 2, 107

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    IRENE Y. SALTER, LESLIE J. ATKINS, What Students Say Versus What They Do Regarding Scientific Inquiry, Science Education, 2014, 98, 1
  21. 21
    KARIN RUDSBERG, JOHAN ÖHMAN, LEIF ÖSTMAN, Analyzing Students’ Learning in Classroom Discussions about Socioscientific Issues, Science Education, 2013, 97, 4
  22. 22
    Mehmet Aydeniz, Deniz Gürçay, Assessing quality of pre-service physics teachers’ written arguments, Research in Science & Technological Education, 2013, 31, 3, 269

    CrossRef

  23. You have free access to this content23
    STEPHANIE CLAUSSEN, JONATHAN OSBORNE, Bourdieu's notion of cultural capital and its implications for the science curriculum, Science Education, 2013, 97, 1
  24. 24
    Dennis W. Smithenry, Jessica Prouty, Brenda M. Capobianco, Collaboratively Exploring the Use of a Video Case-Based Book as a Professional Development Tool, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2013, 22, 5, 735

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    Per Morten Kind, Establishing Assessment Scales Using a Novel Disciplinary Rationale for Scientific Reasoning, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 5
  26. 26
    Jeong-Yoon Jang, Jeonghee Nam, Examining the Relationship between a Structured Reading Framework and Students' Critical Thinking Ability within an Argument-Based Inquiry Approach, Journal of The Korean Association For Research In Science Education, 2013, 33, 3, 569

    CrossRef

  27. 27
    Joi Phelps Walker, Victor Sampson, Learning to Argue and Arguing to Learn: Argument-Driven Inquiry as a Way to Help Undergraduate Chemistry Students Learn How to Construct Arguments and Engage in Argumentation During a Laboratory Course, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 5
  28. 28
    Jonathan Osborne, Shirley Simon, Andri Christodoulou, Christina Howell-Richardson, Katherine Richardson, Learning to argue: A study of four schools and their attempt to develop the use of argumentation as a common instructional practice and its impact on students, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 3
  29. 29
    Shu-Mey Yu, Larry D. Yore, Quality, Evolution, and Positional Change of University Students’ Argumentation Patterns About Organic Agriculture During an Argument–Critique–Argument Experience, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2013, 11, 5, 1233

    CrossRef

  30. 30
    R. G. Duncan, A. E. Rivet, Science Learning Progressions, Science, 2013, 339, 6118, 396

    CrossRef

  31. 31
    Jiyeong Mun, Kongju Mun, Sung-Won Kim, Scientists' Perceptions of Imagination and Characteristics of the Scientific Imagination, Journal of The Korean Association For Research In Science Education, 2013, 33, 7, 1403

    CrossRef

  32. 32
    Aeran Choi, Brian Hand, Thomas Greenbowe, Students’ Written Arguments in General Chemistry Laboratory Investigations, Research in Science Education, 2013, 43, 5, 1763

    CrossRef

  33. 33
    Jonathan Osborne, The 21st century challenge for science education: Assessing scientific reasoning, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2013, 10, 265

    CrossRef

  34. 34
    Julia Svoboda, Cynthia Passmore, The Strategies of Modeling in Biology Education, Science & Education, 2013, 22, 1, 119

    CrossRef

  35. 35
    VICTOR SAMPSON, PATRICK ENDERLE, JONATHON GROOMS, SHELBIE WITTE, Writing to Learn by Learning to Write During the School Science Laboratory: Helping Middle and High School Students Develop Argumentative Writing Skills as They Learn Core Ideas, Science Education, 2013, 97, 5
  36. 36
    Matthew J. Benus, Morgan B. Yarker, Brian M. Hand, Lori A. Norton-Meier, Approaches and Strategies in Next Generation Science Learning, 2013,

    CrossRef

  37. 37
    Michael J. Ford, A Dialogic Account of Sense-Making in Scientific Argumentation and Reasoning, Cognition and Instruction, 2012, 30, 3, 207

    CrossRef

  38. 38
    Victor Sampson, Joi Phelps Walker, Argument-Driven Inquiry as a Way to Help Undergraduate Students Write to Learn by Learning to Write in Chemistry, International Journal of Science Education, 2012, 34, 10, 1443

    CrossRef

  39. 39
    Leema K. Berland, Katherine L. McNeill, For whom is argument and explanation a necessary distinction? A response to Osborne and Patterson, Science Education, 2012, 96, 5
  40. You have free access to this content40
    Leema K. Berland, David Hammer, Framing for scientific argumentation, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2012, 49, 1
  41. 41
    Sevgi Kingir, Omer Geban, Murat Gunel, How does the science writing heuristic approach affect students' performances of different academic achievement levels? A case for high school chemistry, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2012, 13, 4, 428

    CrossRef

  42. 42
    Suna Ryu, William A. Sandoval, Improvements to elementary children's epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation, Science Education, 2012, 96, 3
  43. 43
    Leema K. Berland, Victor R. Lee, In Pursuit of Consensus: Disagreement and legitimization during small-group argumentation, International Journal of Science Education, 2012, 34, 12, 1857

    CrossRef

  44. 44
    Carol L. Smith, Stellan Ohlsson: Deep Learning: How the Mind Overrides Experience, Science & Education, 2012, 21, 9, 1381

    CrossRef

  45. 45
    Eve Manz, Understanding the codevelopment of modeling practice and ecological knowledge, Science Education, 2012, 96, 6
  46. 46
    Victor Sampson, Jonathon Grooms, Joi Phelps Walker, Argument-Driven Inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study, Science Education, 2011, 95, 2
  47. 47
    Leema K. Berland, Brian J. Reiser, Classroom communities' adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation, Science Education, 2011, 95, 2
  48. 48
    Andy R. Cavagnetto, Brian Hand, Lori Norton-Meier, Negotiating the Inquiry Question: A Comparison of Whole Class and Small Group Strategies in Grade Five Science Classrooms, Research in Science Education, 2011, 41, 2, 193

    CrossRef

  49. 49
    Per Morten Kind, Vanessa Kind, Avi Hofstein, Janine Wilson, Peer Argumentation in the School Science Laboratory—Exploring effects of task features, International Journal of Science Education, 2011, 33, 18, 2527

    CrossRef

  50. 50
    Jonathan F. Osborne, Alexis Patterson, Scientific argument and explanation: A necessary distinction?, Science Education, 2011, 95, 4
  51. 51
    Feng Deng, Der-Thanq Chen, Chin-Chung Tsai, Ching Sing Chai, Students' views of the nature of science: A critical review of research, Science Education, 2011, 95, 6
  52. 52
    Leema K. Berland, Katherine L. McNeill, A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts, Science Education, 2010, 94, 5
  53. 53
    Brian Hand, Larry D. Yore, Susan Jagger, Vaughan Prain, Connecting research in science literacy and classroom practice: a review of science teaching journals in Australia, the UK and the United States, 1998–2008, Studies in Science Education, 2010, 46, 1, 45

    CrossRef

  54. 54
    Michael J. Ford, Critique in academic disciplines and active learning of academic content, Cambridge Journal of Education, 2010, 40, 3, 265

    CrossRef

  55. 55
    Larry D. Yore, Brian Hand, Epilogue: Plotting a Research Agenda for Multiple Representations, Multiple Modality, and Multimodal Representational Competency, Research in Science Education, 2010, 40, 1, 93

    CrossRef

  56. 56
    Susan A. Kirch, Identifying and resolving uncertainty as a mediated action in science: A comparative analysis of the cultural tools used by scientists and elementary science students at work, Science Education, 2010, 94, 2
  57. 57
    Siu Ling Wong, Derek Hodson, More from the Horse’s Mouth: What scientists say about science as a social practice, International Journal of Science Education, 2010, 32, 11, 1431

    CrossRef

  58. 58
    Katherine L. McNeill, Diane Silva Pimentel, Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation, Science Education, 2010, 94, 2
  59. 59
    Christine Chin, Jonathan Osborne, Students' questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2010, 47, 7
  60. 60
    Deanna Kuhn, Teaching and learning science as argument, Science Education, 2010, 94, 5
  61. 61
    Andy Cavagnetto, Brian M. Hand, Lori Norton-Meier, The Nature of Elementary Student Science Discourse in the Context of the Science Writing Heuristic Approach, International Journal of Science Education, 2010, 32, 4, 427

    CrossRef

  62. 62
    Bruce Waldrip, Vaughan Prain, Jim Carolan, Using Multi-Modal Representations to Improve Learning in Junior Secondary Science, Research in Science Education, 2010, 40, 1, 65

    CrossRef

  63. 63
    Sun-Kyung Lee, Myeong-Kyeong Shin, Chan-Jong Kim, Exploring the Educational Potential of the Exhibits in Natural History Museums as Socioscientific Learning Materials in the Context of Proposing Science Inquiry Communities: Earthquake Topic, Journal of the Korean earth science society, 2008, 29, 6, 506

    CrossRef

  64. 64
    Richard Lehrer, Leona Schauble, The Development of Scientific Thinking, Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science,