SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science, Project 2061. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Barab, S. A., & Hay, K. E. (2001). Doing science at the elbows of experts: Issues related to the science apprenticeship camp. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 70102.
  • Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Barnett, M., & Squire, K. (2001). Constructing virtual worlds: Tracing the historical development of learner practices. Cognition and Instruction, 19, 4794.
  • Barab, S. A., Squire, K. D., & Dueber, B. (2000). A co-evolutionary model for supporting the emergence of authenticity. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 3762.
  • Bell, R., Blair, L., Crawford, B., & Lederman, N. (2003). Just do it? The impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students' understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 487509.
  • Bianchini, J., & Cavazos, L. M. (2007). Learning from students, inquiry into practice, and participation in professional communities: Beginning teachers' uneven progress toward equitable science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 586612.
  • Boudett, K. P., Murnane, R. J., City, E., & Moody, L. (2005). Teaching educators how to use student assessment data to improve instruction, Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 700706.
  • Brown, A. L., Ash, D., Rutherford, M., Nakagawa, K., Gordon, A., & Campione, J. C. (1993). Distributed expertise in the classroom. In G.Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 188228). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Brownlie, F., Feniak, C., & Schnellert, L. (2006). Student diversity: Classroom strategies to meet the learning needs of all students (2nd ed.). Markham, Ontario, Canada: Pembroke.
  • Charney, J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Sofer, W., Neigeborn, L., Coletta, S., & Nemeroff, M. (2007). Cognitive apprenticeship in science through immersion in laboratory practices. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 195213.
  • Chi, M. T. H. Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (Eds.). (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Chinn, C., & Malhotra, B. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175218.
  • Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B.Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Crawford, T., Kelly, G. J., & Brown, C. (2000). Ways of knowing beyond facts and laws of science: An ethnographic investigation of student engagement in scientific practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 237258.
  • Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and pedagogy. London: Routledge.
  • Davis, E. A., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: Prompts for reflection in KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 819837.
  • Donovan, C. A., & Smolkin, L. B. (2002). Children's genre knowledge: An examination of K-5 students' performance on multiple tasks providing differing levels of scaffolding. Reading Research Quarterly, 37, 428465.
  • Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
  • Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to development research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
  • Gilbert, N., & Mulkay, M. (1984). Opening Pandora's box: A sociological analysis of scientists' discourse. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Goulart, M., & Roth, W. M. (2006). Margin | centre: Toward a dialectic view of participation. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38, 679700.
  • Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
  • Jarman, R. (1997). Fine in theory: A study of primary-secondary continuity in science, prior and subsequent to the introduction of the Northern Ireland Curriculum. Educational Research, 39, 291310.
  • Kaste, J. (2004). Scaffolding through cases: Diverse constructivist teaching in the literacy methods course. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 3145.
  • Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. London: Sage.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lawless, J. G., & Rock, B. N. (1998). Student scientist partnerships and data quality. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7, 513.
  • Lee, H.-S., & Songer, N. B. (2003). Making authentic science accessible to students. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 923948.
  • Lee, O., Buxton, C., Lewis, S., & LeRoy, K. (2006). Science inquiry and student diversity: Enhanced abilities and continuing difficulties after an instructional intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 607636.
  • Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Means, B. (1998). Melding authentic science, technology, and inquiry-based teaching: Experiences of the GLOBE program. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7, 97105.
  • Myhill, D., & Brackley, M. (2004). Making connections: Teachers' use of children's prior knowledge in whole class discourse. British Journal of Educational Studies, 52, 263275.
  • National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Potter, J. (2003). Discourse analysis and discursive psychology. In P. M.Camic, J. E.Rhodes, & L.Yardley (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 7394). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Puntambekar, S., & Kolodner, J. L. (2005). Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science from design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 185217.
  • Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R. G., et al. (2004). Scaffolding the design framework for software to support science inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 337386.
  • Resnick, L. B. (1987). The 1987 presidential address: Learning in school and out. Educational Research, 16(9), 1320.
  • Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Roth, W. M. (1995). Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
  • Roth, W. M. (2005). Doing qualitative research: Praxis of methods. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: SensePublishers.
  • Roth, W. M., Hwang, S., Lee, Y. J., & Goulart, M. I. M. (2005). Participation, learning, and identity: Dialectical perspectives. Berlin, Germany: Lehmanns Media.
  • Roth, W. M., & Middleton, D. (2006). Knowing what you tell, telling what you know: Uncertainty and asymmetries of meaning in interpreting graphical data. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1, 1181.
  • Seedhouse, P. (2005). Conversation analysis as research methodology. In K.Richards & P.Seedhouse (Eds.), Applying conversation analysis (pp. 251266). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Thomson, P., & Gunter, H. (2006). From “consulting pupils” to “pupils as researchers”: A situated case narrative. British Educational Research Journal, 32, 839856.
  • Varelas, M., House, R., & Wenzel, S. (2005). Beginning teachers immersed into science: Scientist and science teacher identities. Science Education, 89, 492516.
  • Verenikina, I. (2003, November 30–December 3, 2003). Understanding scaffolding and the ZPD in educational research. Paper presented at the Australian Association of Educational Research Conference, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Weinstein, B. D. (1993). What is an expert? Theoretical Medicine, 14, 5773.
  • Wiggins, G. (1989). The futility of trying to teach everything of importance. Educational Leadership, 47, 4459.
  • Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89100.