SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Yanlan Wan, Hualin Bi, Representation and Analysis of Chemistry Core Ideas in Science Education Standards between China and the United States, Journal of Chemical Education, 2016, 93, 1, 70

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    SONIA M. UNDERWOOD, DAVID REYES-GASTELUM, MELANIE M. COOPER, Answering the Questions of Whether and When Learning Occurs: Using Discrete-Time Survival Analysis to Investigate the Ways in Which College Chemistry Students’ Ideas About Structure–Property Relationships Evolve, Science Education, 2015, 99, 6
  3. 3
    Chia-Chi Wang, Hsiao-Chi Ho, Ying-Yao Cheng, Building a learning progression for scientific imagination: A measurement approach, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2015, 17, 1

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    S. Cullipher, H. Sevian, V. Talanquer, Reasoning about benefits, costs, and risks of chemical substances: mapping different levels of sophistication, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2015, 16, 2, 377

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Melanie M. Cooper, Why Ask Why?, Journal of Chemical Education, 2015, 92, 8, 1273

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Theodoros Vachliotis, Katerina Salta, Chryssa Tzougraki, Meaningful Understanding and Systems Thinking in Organic Chemistry: Validating Measurement and Exploring Relationships, Research in Science Education, 2014, 44, 2, 239

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    David Wren, Jack Barbera, Psychometric analysis of the thermochemistry concept inventory, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2014, 15, 3, 380

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Hannah Sevian, Vicente Talanquer, Rethinking chemistry: a learning progression on chemical thinking, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2014, 15, 1, 10

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Jennifer Claesgens, Paul L. Daubenmire, Kathleen M. Scalise, Scott Balicki, Perman Gochyyev, Angelica M. Stacy, What Does a Student Know Who Earns a Top Score on the Advanced Placement Chemistry Exam?, Journal of Chemical Education, 2014, 91, 4, 472

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    Vicente Talanquer, Chemistry Education: Ten Facets To Shape Us, Journal of Chemical Education, 2013, 90, 7, 832

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    Bethany Rittle-Johnson, Emily R. Fyfe, Laura E. McLean, Katherine L. McEldoon, Emerging Understanding of Patterning in 4-Year-Olds, Journal of Cognition and Development, 2013, 14, 3, 376

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Jenine Maeyer, Vicente Talanquer, Making predictions about chemical reactivity: Assumptions and heuristics, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 6
  13. 13
    Jennifer Claesgens, Kathleen Scalise, Angelica Stacy, Mapping student understanding in chemistry: The perspectives of chemists, Educación Química, 2013, 24, 4, 407

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Thomas C. Pentecost, Jack Barbera, Measuring Learning Gains in Chemical Education: A Comparison of Two Methods, Journal of Chemical Education, 2013, 90, 7, 839

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Vicente Talanquer, Progresiones de aprendizaje: promesa y potencial, Educación Química, 2013, 24, 4, 362

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Vicente Talanquer, School Chemistry: The Need for Transgression, Science & Education, 2013, 22, 7, 1757

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Susan E. Shadle, Eric C. Brown, Marcy H. Towns, Don L. Warner, A Rubric for Assessing Students’ Experimental Problem-Solving Ability, Journal of Chemical Education, 2012, 89, 3, 319

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Silin Wei, Xiufeng Liu, Zuhao Wang, Xingqiao Wang, Using Rasch Measurement To Develop a Computer Modeling-Based Instrument To Assess Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Matter, Journal of Chemical Education, 2012, 89, 3, 335

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    Marilyne Stains, Marta Escriu-Sune, Myrna Lisseth Molina Alvarez de Santizo, Hannah Sevian, Assessing Secondary and College Students’ Implicit Assumptions about the Particulate Nature of Matter: Development and Validation of the Structure and Motion of Matter Survey, Journal of Chemical Education, 2011, 88, 10, 1359

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    Philip Johnson, Peter Tymms, The emergence of a learning progression in middle school chemistry, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2011, 48, 8