SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Aikenhead, G. S. (1994). What is STS science teaching? In J.Solomon & G.Aikenhead (Eds.), STS education: International perspectives on reform (pp. 4759). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 152.
  • Aikenhead, G. S. (1997). Towards a first nations cross-cultural science and technology curriculum. Science Education, 81, 217238.
  • Aikenhead, G. S. (2000). Renegotiating the culture of school science. In R.Millar, J.Leach, & J.Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education: The contribution of research (pp. 245264). Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
  • Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Angotti, J. A., & Delizoicov, D. (1991). Física. São Paulo, Brazil: Cortez.
  • Arons, A. B. (1983). Achieving wider scientific literacy. Daedalus: Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 112, 91122.
  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M.Bakhtin (MichaelHolquist, Ed. and Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (C.Emerson and M.Holquist, Eds., and V. W. McGee, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Barton, A. C., Ermer, J. L., Burkett, T. A., & Osborne, M. D. (2003). Teaching science for social justice. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Barton, A. C., & Tobin, K. (2001). Urban science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 843846.
  • Barton, A. C., & Tobin, K. (2002). Learning about transformative research through others' stories: What does it mean to involve “others”' in science education reform? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(2), 110113.
  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Newbury Park.
  • Brown, B. A., Reveles, J. M., & Kelly, G. J. (2005). Scientific literacy and discursive identity: A theoretical framework for understanding science learning. Science Education, 89(5), 779802.
  • Corcoran, P. B. (2005). The earth charter in action: Toward a sustainable world. Amsterdam: KIT Publishers.
  • Cross, R. (1995). Conceptions of scientific literacy: Reactionaries in ascendancy in the State of Victoria. Research in Science Education, 25(2), 151162.
  • Cross, R. T., & Price, R. F. (1992). Teaching science for social responsibility. Sydney, Australia: St. Louis Press.
  • Cross, R. T., & Price, R. F. (1996). Science teachers' social conscience and the role of controversial issues in the teaching of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(3), 319333.
  • Cross, R. T., & Price, R. F. (1999). The social responsibility of science and the public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(7), 775785.
  • DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582601.
  • Delizoicov, D. (1991). Conhecimento, tensões e transições. São Paulo, Brazil. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Faculdade de Educação da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Delizoicov, D., Angotti, J. A., & Pernambuco, M. M. (2002). Ensino de Ciências: fundamentos e métodos. São Paulo, Brazil: Cortez.
  • Donnelly, J. F., (2004). Humanizing science education. Science Education, 88(5), 762784.
  • Elmesky, R., & Tobin, K. (2005). Expanding our understandings of urban science education by expanding the roles of students as researchers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 807828.
  • Fourez, G. (1989). Scientific literacy, societal choices, and ideologies. In A. B.Champagne, B. E.Lovitts, & B. J.Calinger (Eds.), This year in school science 1989: Scientific literacy (pp. 114). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
  • Fourez, G. (1997). Science teaching and the STL movement: A socio-historical view. In E.Jenkins (Ed.), Innovations in science and technology education (Vol VI, pp. 4357). Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
  • Frazer, M. J., & Kornhauser, A. (1986). Ethics and social responsibility in science education: An overview. In M. J.Frazer & A.Kornhauser (Eds.), Science and technology education and future human needs (Vol. 2, pp. 3136) Oxford, England: Icsu Press by Pergamon Press.
  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: The Seabury Press.
  • Freire, P. (1973). Education for critical consciousness. New York: The Seabury Press.
  • Freire, P. (1976). Education: The practice of freedom. London: Writers & Readers.
  • Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the city. New York: Continuum Press.
  • Freire, P. (1994). Pedagogy of hope: Reliving pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
  • Freire, P., Fraser, J. W., Macedo, D., Mckinnon, T., & Stokes, W. T. (Eds.). (1997). Mentoring the mentor: A critical dialogue with Paulo Freire. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Geddis, A. N. (1991). Improving the quality of science classroom discourse on controversial issues. Science Education, 75(2), 169183.
  • Giddens, A. (1991). The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Kolstoe, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85(3), 291310.
  • Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84(1), 7194.
  • Levinson, R. (2001). Should controversial issues in science be taught through the humanities? School Science Review, 82(300), 97102.
  • Lumpe, A. T., Haney, J. J., & Czerniak, C. M. (1998). Science teacher beliefs and intentions to implement science–technology–society (STS) in the classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9(1), 124.
  • McLaren, P., & Lankshear, C. (Eds.). (1994). Politics of liberation: Paths from Freire. New York: Routledge.
  • McLaren, P., & Leonard, P. (Eds.). (1993). Paulo Freire: A critical encounter. New York: Routledge.
  • Millar, R. (1996). Towards a science curriculum for public understanding. School Science Review, 77(280), 718.
  • Miller, J. D. (1983). Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus: Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 112(2), 2948.
  • Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
  • Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224240.
  • Pernambuco, M. M. C. A. (1981). Ensino de ciências a partir de problemas da comunidade. Unpublished Master thesis, Faculdade de Educação da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Ramsey, J. (1993). The science education reform movement: Implications for social responsibility. Science Education, 77(2), 235258.
  • Ratcliffe, M. (1997). Pupil decision-making about socio-scientific issues within the science curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 167182.
  • Ratcliffe, M. (2001). Science, technology and society in school science education. School Science Review, 82(300), 8392.
  • Ratcliffe, M., & Grace, M. (2003). Science education for citizenship: Teaching socio-scientific issues. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
  • Roberts, P. (2000). Education, literacy, and humanization: Exploring the work of Paulo Freire. London: Bergin & Garvey.
  • Roth, W.-M., & Barton, A. C. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. New York: Routledge Falmer.
  • Roth, W.-M., & Désautels, J. (2002). Science education as/for socio-political action: Charting the landscape, In W.-M.Roth, & J.Désautels (Eds.), Science education as/for socio-political action (pp. 116). New York: Peter Lang.
  • Roth, W.-M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88(2), 263291.
  • Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy: Implications for school science education. Studies in Science Education, 36, 144.
  • Sanders, T. G. (1972). The Paulo Freire method: Literacy training and conscientization. In T. J.La Belle (Ed.), Education and development: Latin America and the Caribbean (pp. 587599). Los Angeles: Latin American Center.
  • Santos, W. L. P. dos, Mól, G. de S., Silva, R. R., Castro, E. N. F. de, Silva, G. de S, Matsunaga, R. T., Farias, S. B., Santos, S. M. de O., & Dib, S. M. F. (2006). Chemistry and society: An approach to introducing socioscientific issues in a traditional science curriculum. In R. M.Janiuk & E.Samonek-Miciuk. (Ed.), Science and technology education for a diverse world: Dilemmas, needs and partnerships (pp. 447461). Lublin, Poland: Maria Curie-Sklodowska University Press.
  • Santos, W. L. P. dos, & Mortimer, E. F. (2002). Humanistic science education from Paulo Freire's “Education as the practice of freedom” perspective. In N. Bizzo, C. S. Kawasaki, L. Ferracioli, & V. L. Rosa (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Symposium of the International Organization for Science and Technology Education (Vol. 2, pp. 641–649). Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil.
  • Scott, P. H., Mortimer, E. F., & Aguiar, O. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90(7), 605631.
  • Shamos, M. H. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Shen, B. S. P. (1975). Science literacy. American Scientist, 63(3), 265268.
  • Solomon, J. (1988). The dilemma of science, technology and society education. In P. J.Fensham (Ed.), Development and dilemmas in science education (pp. 266281). London: The Falmer Press.
  • Solomon, J. (1993). Teaching science, technology and society. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
  • Tal, R. T., Dori, Y. F., Keiny, S., & Zoller, U. (2001). Assessing conceptual change of teachers involved in STES education and curriculum development—The STEMS project approach. International Journal of Science Education, 23(3), 247262.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1934). Thinking and speech: Psychological investigations. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe Sotsia'no – Ekonomicheskoe Izdatel'stvo.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Waks, L. J. (1992). The responsibility spiral: A curriculum framework for STS education. Theory Into Practice, 31(1), 1319.
  • Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  • Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M., L. (2002). Tangled up views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86(3), 343367.