SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Zuhao Wang, Shaohui Chi, Kaiyan Hu, Wenting Chen, Chemistry Teachers’ Knowledge and Application of Models, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2014, 23, 2, 211

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Lucy Avraamidou, Developing a Reform-Minded Science Teaching Identity: The Role of Informal Science Environments, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2014,

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Jing-Wen Lin, ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHERS’ KNOWLEDGE OF MODEL FUNCTIONS AND MODELING PROCESSES: A COMPARISON OF SCIENCE AND NON-SCIENCE MAJORS, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2014, 12, 5, 1197

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Feral Ogan-Bekiroğlu, Arzu Arslan, Examination of the Effects of Model-based Inquiry on Students’ Outcomes: Scientific Process Skills and Conceptual Knowledge, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, 141, 1187

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Amy Ricketts, Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Ideas About Scientific Practices, Science & Education, 2014,

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Noemi Waight, Xiufeng Liu, Roberto Ma. Gregorius, Erica Smith, Mihwa Park, Teacher Conceptions and Approaches Associated with an Immersive Instructional Implementation of Computer-Based Models and Assessment in a Secondary Chemistry Classroom, International Journal of Science Education, 2014, 36, 3, 467

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Noemi Waight, Kristina Gillmeister, Teachers and Students’ Conceptions of Computer-Based Models in the Context of High School Chemistry: Elicitations at the Pre-intervention Stage, Research in Science Education, 2014, 44, 2, 335

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Vicente Talanquer, Debra Tomanek, Ingrid Novodvorsky, Assessing students' understanding of inquiry: What do prospective science teachers notice?, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 2
  9. 9
    G. Everaert, I.S. Pauwels, P. Boets, F. Buysschaert, P.L.M. Goethals, Development and assessment of ecological models in the context of the European Water Framework Directive: Key issues for trainers in data-driven modeling approaches, Ecological Informatics, 2013, 17, 111

    CrossRef

  10. You have free access to this content10
    KRISTIN L. GUNCKEL, Fulfilling multiple obligations: Preservice elementary teachers’ use of an instructional model while learning to plan and teach science, Science Education, 2013, 97, 1
  11. 11
    Gail Jones, Laura Robertson, Grant E. Gardner, Sharon Dotger, Margaret R. Blanchard, Differential Use of Elementary Science Kits, International Journal of Science Education, 2012, 34, 15, 2371

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Shaljan Areepattamannil, Effects of Inquiry-Based Science Instruction on Science Achievement and Interest in Science: Evidence from Qatar, The Journal of Educational Research, 2012, 105, 2, 134

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Ester Alake-Tuenter, Harm J.A. Biemans, Hilde Tobi, Arjen E.J. Wals, Ida Oosterheert, Martin Mulder, Inquiry-Based Science Education Competencies of Primary School Teachers: A literature study and critical review of the American National Science Education Standards, International Journal of Science Education, 2012, 34, 17, 2609

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Yangjie Song, Chee-Kit Looi, Linking teacher beliefs, practices and student inquiry-based learning in a CSCL environment: A tale of two teachers, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2012, 7, 1, 129

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Loucas T. Louca, Zacharias C. Zacharia, Modeling-based learning in science education: cognitive, metacognitive, social, material and epistemological contributions, Educational Review, 2012, 64, 4, 471

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Michele M. Nelson, Elizabeth A. Davis, Preservice Elementary Teachers' Evaluations of Elementary Students' Scientific Models: An aspect of pedagogical content knowledge for scientific modeling, International Journal of Science Education, 2012, 34, 12, 1931

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Bart J. B. Ormel, Natalie N. Pareja Roblin, Susan E. McKenney, Joke M. Voogt, Jules M. Pieters, Research–practice interactions as reported in recent design studies: still promising, still hazy, Educational Technology Research and Development, 2012, 60, 6, 967

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Rachel E. Wilson, Julie M. Kittleson, The Role of Struggle in Pre-Service Elementary Teachers’ Experiences as Students and Approaches to Facilitating Science Learning, Research in Science Education, 2012, 42, 4, 709

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    Loucas T. Louca, Zacharias C. Zacharia, Constantinos P. Constantinou, In Quest of productive modeling-based learning discourse in elementary school science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2011, 48, 8
  20. 20
    Kristin L. Gunckel, Mediators of a Preservice Teacher’s Use of the Inquiry-Application Instructional Model, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2011, 22, 1, 79

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    Deborah C. Smith, Shinho Jang, Pathways in Learning to Teach Elementary Science: Navigating Contexts, Roles, Affordances and Constraints, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2011, 22, 8, 745

    CrossRef

  22. 22
    Cory T. Forbes, Preservice elementary teachers' adaptation of science curriculum materials for inquiry-based elementary science, Science Education, 2011, 95, 5
  23. 23
    Samia Khan, What’s Missing in Model-Based Teaching, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2011, 22, 6, 535

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    Robert N. Ronau, Christopher R. Rakes, Educational Technology, Teacher Knowledge, and Classroom Impact, 2011,

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    Abdulkadir Demir, Sandra K. Abell, Views of inquiry: Mismatches between views of science education faculty and students of an alternative certification program, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2010, 47, 6
  26. You have free access to this content26
    Carla Zembal-Saul, Learning to teach elementary school science as argument, Science Education, 2009, 93, 4
  27. You have free access to this content27
    Jamie N. Mikeska, Charles W. Anderson, Christina V. Schwarz, Principled reasoning about problems of practice, Science Education, 2009, 93, 4