SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abell, S. K., Bryan, L. A., & Anderson, M. A. (1998). Investigating preservice elementary science teacher reflective thinking using integrated media case-based instruction in elementary science teacher preparation. Science Education, 82(4), 491509.
  • Abraham, M. R. (1998). The learning cycle approach as a strategy for instruction in science. In B. J.Fraser & K. G.Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 513524). Boston: Kluwer.
  • Appleton, K. (2002). Science activities that work: Perceptions of primary school teachers. Research in Science Education, 32, 393410.
  • Appleton, K. (Ed.). (2006). Elementary science teacher education: International perspectives on contemporary issues and practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Ball, D. L., & Feiman-Nemser, S. (1988). Using textbooks and teachers' guides: A dilemma for beginning teachers and teacher educators. Curriculum Inquiry, 18(4), 401423.
  • Brown, A. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141178.
  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Druguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 3242.
  • Bruce, B. C., & Levin, J. A. (1997). Educational technology: Media for inquiry, communication, construction, and expression. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(1), 79102.
  • Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Calabrese Barton, A., Gunckel, K., Covitt, B., & McLaughlin, D. (2007, July). Considering students' strengths: Helping elementary preservice teachers take account of students' resources in planning and teaching science lessons. Poster presented at the Center for Curriculum Materials in Science Knowledge Sharing Institute, Washington, DC.
  • Covitt, B., Schwarz, C., Bae, M., & Mikeska, J. (2008, April). Facilitating preservice teachers' development of professional practice through a boundary spanning activity. Paper presented at the conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Baltimore, MD.
  • Crawford, B., & Cullin, M. (2004). Supporting prospective teachers' conceptions of modeling in science. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 13791401.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Davis, E. A. (2006). Preservice elementary teachers' critique of instructional materials for science. Science Education, 90(2), 348375.
  • Davis, E. A., & Smithey, J. (2009). Beginning teachers moving toward effective elementary science teaching. Science Education, 93, 745770.
  • Davis, E. A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 607651.
  • Feiman-Nemser. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 10131055.
    Direct Link:
  • Feurzeig, W., & Roberts, N. (Eds.). (1999). Computer modeling and simulation in science education. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Gee, J. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourse. London: Falmer.
  • Gobert, J., & Buckley, B. (2000). Introduction to model-based teaching and learning in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 891894.
  • Grossman, P., & Thompson, C. (2004). Curriculum materials: Scaffolds for new teacher learning? Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy and Center on English Learning & Achievement (CELA).
  • Gunckel, K. L., Bae, M.-J., & Smith, E. L. (2007, April). Using instructional models to promote effective use of curriculum materials among preservice elementary teachers. Paper presented at the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
  • Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In L.Darling-Hammond & J.Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (p. 358389) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Harrison, A., & Treagust, D. (2000). A typology of school science models. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 10111026.
  • Henze, I., van Driel, J., & Verloop, N. (2007). Science teachers' knowledge about teaching models and modeling in the context of a new syllabus on public understanding of science. Research in Science Education, 37(2), 99122.
  • Howes, E. (2002). Learning to teach science for all in the elementary grades: What do preservice teachers bring? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 845869.
  • Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. (2002). Science teachers' knowledge about and attitudes towards the use of models and modeling in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(12), 12731292.
  • Kauffman, D., Johnson, S. M., Kardos, S. M., Lui, E., & Peske, H. G. (2002). “Lost at sea”: New teachers' experiences with curriculum and assessment. Teachers College Record, 104(2), 273300.
  • Kesidou, S., & Roseman, J. E. (2002). How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 522549.
  • LaBoskey, V. K. (2007). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In J. J.Loughran, M. L.Hamilton, V.LaBoskey, & T.Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 817870). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • LaVan, S.-K. (2006, April). Culturally-adaptive practices. Talk presented at the conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, CA.
  • Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2000). Modeling in mathematics and science. In R.Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology: Volume 5: Educational design and cognitive science (pp. 101159). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. M. (2003). Foundations of models and modeling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning, and problem solving. In R.Lesh & H. M.Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 333). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J.Gess-Newsome & N.Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 9513). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
  • Mellar, H., Bliss, J., Boohan, R., Ogborn, J., & Tompsett, C. (Eds.). (1994). Learning with artificial worlds: Computer based modeling in the curriculum. Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
  • Mikeska, J. N., Anderson, C. W., & Schwarz, C. V. (2009). Principled reasoning about problems of practice. Science Education, 93, 678686.
  • Moore, F. M. (2008). Agency, identity and social justice education: Preservice teachers' thoughts on becoming agents of change in urban elementary science classrooms. Research in Science Education, 38(5), 589610.
  • Mulholland, J., & Wallace, J. (2005). Growing the tree of teacher knowledge: Ten years of learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 767790.
  • National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 415.
  • Raghavan, K., & Glaser, R. (1995). Model-based analysis and reasoning in science: The MARS curriculum. Science Education, 79(1), 3761.
  • Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211246.
  • Rice, D. C., & Roychoudhury, A. (2003). Preparing more confident preservice elementary science teachers: One elementary science methods' teachers' self-study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14(2), 97126.
  • Roth, K. J. (1991). Learning to be comfortable in the neighborhood of science: An analysis of three approaches to elementary science teaching. In W.Saul & S. A.Jagusch (Eds.), Vital connections: Children, science, and books Washington, DC: Library of Congress.
  • Schwarz, C., & White, B. (2005). Meta-modeling knowledge: Developing students' understanding of scientific modeling. Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 165205.
  • Schwarz, C., & Gwekwerere, Y. (2007). Using a guided inquiry and modeling instructional framework (EIMA) to support pre-service K-8 science teaching. Science Education, 91(1), 158186.
  • Schwarz, C., Meyer, J., & Sharma, A. (2007). Technology, pedagogy, and epistemology: Opportunities and challenges of using computer modeling and simulation tools in elementary science methods. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(2), 243269.
  • Schwarz, C., Gunckel, K., Smith, E., Covitt, B., Bae, M., Enfield, M., et al. (2008). Helping elementary pre-service teachers learn to use science curriculum materials for effective science teaching. Science Education, 92(2), 345377.
  • Schwarz, C., Reiser, B., Davis, B., Kenyon, L., Acher, A., Fortus, D., et al. (in press). Designing a learning progression of scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal for Research in Science Teaching.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 122.
  • Smith, C., Snir, J., & Grosslight, L. (1992). Using conceptual models to facilitate conceptual change: The case of weight-density differentiation. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 221283.
  • Smith, C., Snir, J., & Raz, G. (2002, April). Can middle schoolers understand the particulate theory of matter as an explanatory model? An exploratory study. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
  • Southerland, S., & Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Preservice teachers' views of inclusive science teaching as shaped by images of teaching, learning, and knowledge. Science Education, 83(2), 131150.
  • Spitulnik, M., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1999). Construction of models to promote scientific understanding. In W.Feurzeig & N.Roberts (Eds.), Modeling and simulation in science and mathematics education (pp. 7094). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Stern, L., & Roseman, J. E. (2004). Can middle-school science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum evaluation study: Life science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 538568.
  • Stewart, J., Cartier, J., & Passmore, C. (2005). Developing understanding through model-based inquiry. In S.Donovan & J.Bransford (Eds.), How students learn: Science in the classroom (pp. 515565). Washington DC: National Academies Press.
  • van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (1999). Teachers' knowledge of models and modeling in science. International Journal for Science Education, 21(11), 11411153.
  • van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2002). Experienced teachers' knowledge of teaching and learning of models and modeling in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 24(12), 12551272.
  • van Zee, E. (2006). Teaching “science teaching” through inquiry. In K.Appleton (Ed.), Elementary science teacher education; International perspectives on contemporary issues and practice (pp. 239258). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • White, B., & Frederiksen, J. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3118.
  • Windschitl, M., & Thompson, J. (2006). Transcending simple forms of school science investigations: Can pre-service instruction foster teachers' understandings of model-based inquiry? American Educational Research Journal, 43(4), 783835.
  • Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941967.
  • Zembal-Saul, C. (2009). Learning to teach elementary school science as argument. Science Education, 93, 687719.
  • Zembal-Saul, C., Blumenfled, P., & Krajcik, J. (2000). Influence of guided cycles of planning, teaching, and reflecting on prospective elementary teachers' science content representations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 318339.