SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Brook, A. (1997). Approaches to abstraction: A commentary. International Journal of Educational Research, 27, 7788.
  • Dewey, J. (1996). Democracy and education. In L.Hickman (Ed.), Collected works of John Dewey, 1882–1953: The electronic edition (middle works, Vol. 9, pp. 343353) Charlottesville, VA: InteLex Corporation. (original work published 1916).
  • Dewey, J. (1996). Experience and Nature. In L.Hickman (Ed.), Collected works of John Dewey, 1882–1953: The electronic edition (later works, Vol. 1, p. 19) Charlottesville, VA: InteLex Corporation. (original work published 1925).
  • Dewey, J. (1996). The quest for certainty. In L.Hickman (Ed.), Collected works of John Dewey, 1882–1953: The electronic edition (later works, Vol. 4, p. 157) Charlottesville, VA: InteLex Corporation. (original work published 1929)
  • Dewey, J. (1996). Experience and education. In L.Hickman (Ed.), Collected works of John Dewey, 1882–1953: The electronic edition (Later Works, Vol. 13, p. 25) Charlottesville, VA: InteLex Corporation. (original work published 1938).
  • diSessa, A. A., Gillespie, N. M., & Esterly, J. B. (2004). Coherence versus fragmentation in the development of the concept of force. Cognitive Science, 28, 843900.
  • Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children's ideas. London: Routledge.
  • Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 671688.
  • Garnett, P. J., Garnett, P. J., & Hackling, M. W. (1995). Students' alternative conceptions in chemistry: A review of research and implications for teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 25, 6995.
  • Garnett, P. J., & Treagust, D. F. (1992). Conceptual difficulties experienced by senior high school students of electrochemistry: Electrochemical (galvanic) and electrolytic cells. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 10791099.
  • Garrison, J. W. (1995). Deweyan pragmatism and the epistemology of contemporary social constructivism. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 716740.
  • Goodwin, C. (1993). The blackness of black: Color categories as situated practice. In L. B.Resnick, R.Säljö, C.Pontecorvo, & B.Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (Vol. 160, pp. 111140) Berlin: Springer in cooperation with NATO Scientific Affairs Division.
  • Greeno, J. G. (1995). Understanding concepts in activity. In C. A.Weaver, S.Mannes, & C. R.Fletcher (Eds.), Discourse comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch (pp. 6595). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Greeno, J. G. (1997). On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 26, 517.
  • Greeno, J. G. (2006). Learning in activity. In K. R.Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 7996). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hamza, K. M., & Wickman, P.-O. (2008). Describing and analyzing learning in action: An empirical study of the importance of misconceptions in learning science. Science Education, 92, 141164.
  • Kelly, G. J., & Crawford, T. (1997). An ethnographic investigation of the discourse processes of school science. Science Education, 81, 533559.
  • Leach, J., & Scott, P. (2002). Designing and evaluating science teaching sequences: An approach drawing upon the concept of learning demand and a social constructivist perspective on learning. Studies in Science Education, 38, 115142.
  • Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  • Lemke, J., Kelly, G., & Roth, W.-M. (2006). FORUM: Toward a phenomenology of interviews. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1, 83106.
  • Lidar, M., Lundqvist, E., & Östman, L. (2006). Teaching and learning in the science classroom: The interplay between teachers' epistemological moves and students' practical epistemology. Science Education, 90, 148163.
  • Millar, R. (1991). A means to an end: The role of processes in science education. In B. E.Woolnough (Ed.), Practical science (pp. 4352). Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
  • Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H., & Novak, J. D. (2001). Assessing understanding in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 35, 118124.
  • Nokes, T. J., & Ohlsson, S. (2005). Comparing multiple paths to mastery: What is learned? Cognitive Science, 29, 769796.
  • Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. V.Wertsch, P.del Río, & A.Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139164). New York: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
  • Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G. M. (2003). When are graphs worth ten thousand words? An expert–expert study. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 429473.
  • Roth, W.-M., & Hwang, S. (2006a). Does mathematical learning occur in going from concrete to abstract or in going from abstract to concrete? Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 25, 334344.
  • Roth, W.-M., & Hwang, S. (2006b). On the relation of abstract and concrete in scientists' graph interpretations: A case study. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 25, 318333.
  • Roth, W.-M., & Middleton, D. (2006). Knowing what you tell, telling what you know: Uncertainty and asymmetries of meaning in interpreting graphical data. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1, 1181.
  • Säljö, R. (1999). Learning as the use of tools. A sociocultural perspective on the human–technology link. In K.Littleton & P.Light (Eds.), Learning with computers: Analysing productive interaction (pp. 144161). London: Routledge.
  • Säljö, R., & Bergqvist, K. (1993). Seeing the light: Discourse and practice in the optics lab. In L. B.Resnick, R.Säljö, C.Pontecorvo, & B.Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (Vol. 160, pp. 385405) Berlin: Springer in cooperation with NATO Scientific Affairs Division.
  • Sanger, M. J., & Greenbowe, T. J. (1997). Common student misconceptions in electrochemistry: Galvanic, electrolytic, and concentration cells. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 377398.
  • Schwab, J. J. (1978). The nature of scientific knowledge as related to liberal education. In I.Westbury & N. J.Wilkof (Eds.), Science, curriculum, and liberal education: Selected essays Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Scott, P., Asoko, H., & Leach, J. (2007). Student conceptions and conceptual learning in science. In S. K.Abell & N. G.Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 3156). Mahwaw, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27, 413.
  • Solomon, J. (1994). The rise and fall of constructivism. Studies in Science Education, 23, 119.
  • Sutton, C. (1992). Words, science and learning. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
  • Taber, K. S. (2006). Beyond constructivism: The progressive research programme into learning science. Studies in Science Education, 42, 125184.
  • Taber, K., & Watts, M. (2000). Learners' explanations for chemical phenomena. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 1, 329353.
  • Vosniadou, S., Ioannides, C., Dimitrakopoulou, A., & Papademetriou, E. (2001). Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science. Learning and Instruction, 11, 381419.
  • Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wertsch, J. V., del Río, P., & Alvarez, A. (1995). Sociocultural studies: History, action, and mediation. In J. V.Wertsch, P.Del Río, & A.Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 134). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wickman, P.-O. (2006). Aesthetic experience in science education: Learning and meaning-making as situated talk and action. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Wickman, P.-O., & Östman, L. (2002a). Induction as an empirical problem: How students generalize during practical work. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 465486.
  • Wickman, P.-O., & Östman, L. (2002b). Learning as discourse change: A sociocultural mechanism. Science Education, 86, 601623.