SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abrams, L. M., Pedulla, J. J., & Madaus, G. F. (2003). Views from the classroom: Teachers' opinions of statewide testing programs. Theory into Practice, 42(1), 1829.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: A Project 2061 report. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Bianchini, J. A., & Kelly, G. J. (2003). Challenges of standards-based reform: The example of California's science content standards and textbook adoption process. Science Education, 87, 378389.
  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Certo, J. L. (2006). Beginning teacher concerns in an accountability-based environment. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 20(4), 331349.
  • Certo, J. L., Cauley, K. M., Moxley, K. D., & Chafin, C. (2008). An argument for authenticity: Adolescents' perspectives on standards-based reform. The High School Journal, 91(4), 2339.
  • Chen, W. (2006). Teachers' knowledge about and views of the National Standards for Physical Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25, 120142.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Crocco, M. S., & Costigan, A. T. (2007). The narrowing of curriculum and pedagogy in the age of accountability: Urban educators speak out. Urban Education, 42, 512535.
  • Donnelly, L. A., & Boone, W. J. (2007). Biology teachers' attitudes toward and use of Indiana's evolution standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 236257.
  • Elmore, R. (2003). School reform from the inside out. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Finnigan, K. S., & Gross, B. (2007). Do accountability policy sanctions influence teacher motivation? Lessons from Chicago's low-performing schools. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 594629.
  • Grobe, W. J., & McCall, D. (2004). Valid uses of student testing as part of authentic and comprehensive student assessment, school reports, and school system accountability. Educational Horizons, 82, 131142.
  • Gross, P. R. (2005). The state of state science standards. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
  • Indiana Department of Education. (2000). State board adopts new science standards. Indiana Department of Education News Release, November 2, 2000.
  • Jenkins, E. W. (2000). The impact of the national curriculum on secondary school science teaching in England and Wales. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 325336.
  • Jones, B. D., & Egley, R. J. (2006). Looking through different lenses: Teachers' and administrators' views of accountability. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(10), 767771.
  • Kahle, J. B., Meece, J., & Scantlebury, K. (2000). Urban African American middle school science students: Does standards-based teaching make a difference? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 10191041.
  • Leithwood, K., & Earl, L. (2000). Educational accountability effects: An international perspective. Peabody Journal of Education, 75(4), 118.
  • Leonard, W. H., Speziale, B. J., & Penick, J. E. (2001). Performance assessment of a standards-based high school curriculum. American Biology Teacher, 63, 310316.
  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Lomax, R. C., West, M. M., Harmon, M. C., Viator, K. A., & Madaus, G. F. (2003). The impact of mandated standardized testing on minority students. Journal of Negro Education, 64, 171185.
  • Louis, K. S., Febey, K., & Schroeder, R. (2005). State-mandated accountability in high schools: Teachers' interpretations of a new era. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 27, 177204.
  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2008). Attrition of public school mathematics and science teachers. Retrieved July 14, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/PUBSEARCH/pubsinfo.asp&pubid=2008077.
  • National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Raizen, S. A. (1998). Standards for science education. Teachers College Record, 100, 66121.
  • Rustique-Forrester, E. (2005). Accountability and the pressures to exclude: A cautionary tale from England. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13, 139.
  • Seiler, G. (2001). Reversing the “standard” direction: Science emerging from the lives of African American students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 10001014.
  • Settlage, J., Jr., & Meadows, L. (2002). Standards-based reform and its unintended consequences: Implications for science education within America's urban schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 114127.
  • Shaver, A., Cuevas, P., Lee, O., & Avalos, M. (2007). Teachers' perceptions of policy influences on science instruction with culturally and linguistically diverse elementary students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 725746.
  • Sheese, J., & McDaniel, T. P. (2002). Assessing schools: Not child's play. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 38(2), 6872.
  • Standards, Assessment, School Improvement, and Accountability. Indiana General Assembly (1999).
  • Stern, L., & Ahlgren, A. (2002). Analysis of students' assessments in middle school curriculum materials: Aiming precisely at benchmarks and standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 889910.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.
  • Tye, B. B., & O'Brien, L. (2002). Why are experienced teachers leaving the profession? Phi Delta Kappan, 84(1), 2432.
  • U.S. Department of Education Office of the Deputy Secretary. (2004). No Child Left Behind: A toolkit for teachers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
  • Von Secker, C. E., & Lissitz, R. W. (1999). Estimating the impact of instructional practices on student achievement in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 11101126.
  • Waugh, R. F., & Punch, K. F. (1987). Teacher receptivity to systemwide change in the implementation stage. Review of Educational Research, 57(3), 237254.
  • Wideen, M. F., O'Shea, T., Pye, I., & Ivany, G. (1997). High-stakes testing and the teaching of science. Canadian Journal of Education, 22, 428444.
  • Winkler, A. (2002). Division in the ranks: Standardized testing draws lines between new and veteran teachers. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(3), 219225.