SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Adams, C. M., & Pierce, R. L. (2004). Tiered lessons: One way to differentiate mathematics instruction. Gifted Child Today, 27(2), 5865.
  • Adams, P. E., & Krockover, G. H. (1997). Concerns and perceptions of beginning secondary science and mathematics teachers. Science Education, 81(1), 2950.
  • Aikenhead, G. S. (2001). Students' ease in crossing cultural borders into school science. Science Education, 85(2), 180188.
  • Barton, A. C. (1998). Teaching science with homeless children: Pedagogy, representation, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(4), 379394.
  • Bianchini, J. A., & Cavazos, L. M. (2007). Learning from students, inquiry into practice, and participation in professional communities: Beginning teachers' uneven progress toward equitable science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 586612.
  • Bianchini, J. A., Cavazos, L. M., & Helms, J. V. (2000). From professional lives to inclusive practice: Science teachers and scientists' views of gender and ethnicity in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 511547.
  • Boaler, J. (2003). When learning no longer matters: Standardized testing and the creation of inequality. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(7), 502506.
  • Boaler, J. (2004). Promoting equity in mathematics classrooms—Successful teaching practices and their impact on student learning. Plenary presentation at the 10th International Congress on Mathematics Education, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 315.
  • Brand, B. R., & Glasson, G. E. (2004). Crossing cultural borders into science teaching: Early life experiences, racial and ethnic identities, and beliefs about diversity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 119141.
  • Brown, B. A., & Ryoo, K. (2008). Teaching science as a language: A content-first approach to science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), 529553.
  • Buck, G., Mast, C., Ehlers, N., & Franklin, E. (2005). Preparing teachers to create a mainstream science classroom conducive to the needs of English-language learners: A feminist action research project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(9), 10131031.
  • California Commission on Teacher Credentialing. (1997). California standards for the teaching profession. Sacramento: California Department of Education.
  • California Commission on Teacher Credentialing. (2002). Standards of quality and effectiveness for professional teacher education programs. Sacramento: California Department of Education.
  • California Department of Education. (1999). Mathematics content standards for California public schools: Kindergarten through grade twelve. Sacramento, CA: Author.
  • California Department of Education. (2000). Science content standards for California public schools: Kindergarten through grade twelve. Sacramento, CA: Author.
  • California Department of Education. (2002). English language development standards for California public schools: Kindergarten through grade twelve. Sacramento, CA: Author.
  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1999). Relationship of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. In A.Iran-Nejad & P. D.Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (pp. 249305). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Davis, E. A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 607651.
  • Delpit, L. D. (2003). Educators as “seed people” growing a new future. Educational Researcher, 7(32), 1421.
  • Diaz-Rico, L. T., & Weed, K. Z. (1995). The crosscultural, language, and academic development handbook. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Erbes, S. (2002). Surviving and thriving in the teaching profession: A description of the experiences and resources used by teachers of a California-based Beginning Teacher Support and Assessment (BTSA) program (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara, 2002). Dissertation Abstracts International, 63, 2203.
  • Erickson, F. (1993). Foreword. In M.Cochran-Smith & S. L.Lytle (Eds.), Inside outside: Teacher research and knowledge (pp viiix). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 10131055.
    Direct Link:
  • Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 9421012.
    Direct Link:
  • Heacox, D. (2002). Differentiating instruction in the regular classroom. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit.
  • Hollins, E., & Guzman, M. T. (2005). Research on preparing teachers for diverse populations. In M.Cochran-Smith & K. M.Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education (pp. 477548). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Khisty, L. L. (1995). Making inequality: Issues of language and meanings in mathematics teaching with Hispanic students. In W. G.Secada, E.Fennema, & L. B.Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 279297). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kohl, H. (1994). I won't learn from you! In B.Bigelow, L.Christensen, S.Karp, B.Miner, & B.Peterson (Eds.), Rethinking our classrooms (pp. 134135). Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.
  • Koutselini, M., & Gagatsis, A. (2003). Curriculum development for the differentiated classroom in mathematics. World Studies in Education, 4(1), 4565.
  • Kumashiro, K. K. (2001). “Posts” perspectives on anti-oppressive education in social studies, English, mathematics, and science classrooms. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 312.
  • Ladson-Billings, G. (2001). Crossing over to Canaan: The journey of new teachers in diverse classrooms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Liston, D., Whitcomb, J., & Borko, H. (2006). Too little or too much: Teacher preparation and the first years of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(4), 351358.
  • Lee, C. (2003). Why we need to re-think race and ethnicity in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 35.
  • Lee, O., Lewis, S., Adamson, K., Maerten-Rivera, J., & Secada, W. G. (2007). Urban elementary school teachers' knowledge and practices in teaching science to English language learners. Science Education, 126.
  • Levin, B. B., & Rock, T. C. (2003). The effects of collaborative action research on preservice and experienced teacher partners in professional development schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 135149.
  • Lippincott, A. C. (1999). Reflective thinking among and between beginning professional educators. Unpublished dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
  • Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago.
  • Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Lovin, L., Kyger, M., & Allsopp, D. (2004). Differentiation for special needs learners. Teaching Children Mathematics, 11(3), 158167.
  • Luft, J. A., Roehrig, G. H., & Patterson, N. C. (2003). Contrasting landscapes: A comparison of the impact of different induction programs on beginning secondary science teachers' practices, beliefs, and experiences. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(1), 7797.
  • Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • McGinnis, J. R., Parker, C., & Graeber, A. O. (2004). A cultural perspective of the induction of five reform-minded beginning mathematics and science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(7), 729747.
  • McLaughlin, M., & Talbert, J. E. (1993). Contexts that matter for teaching and learning: Strategic opportunities for meeting the nation's educational goals. Stanford, CA: Center for Research on the Context of Secondary School Teaching, Stanford University.
  • Meyer, H. (2004). Novice and expert teachers' conceptions of learner's prior knowledge. Science Education, 88, 970983.
  • Moschkovich, J. N. (1999). Understanding the needs of Latino students in reform-oriented mathematics classrooms. In L.Ortiz-Franco, N.Hernandez, & Y.De La Cruz (Eds.), Changing the faces of mathematics: Vol. 4. Perspectives on Latinos (pp. 512). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
  • National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Nieto, S. (1999). The light in their eyes. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Noffke, S. E. (1997). Professional, personal, and political dimensions of action research. In M. W.Apple (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 305343). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 415.
  • Research Committee, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2005). Equity in school mathematics education: How can research contribute? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(2), 92100.
  • Rodriguez, A. J., & Kitchen, R. S. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms: Promising strategies for transformative pedagogy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Roehrig, G. H., & Luft, J. A. (2006). Does one size fit all? The induction experience of beginning science teachers from different teacher-preparation programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(9), 963985.
  • Rosebery, A. S., & Puttick, G. M. (1998). Teacher professional development as situated sense-making: A case study in science education. Science Education, 82, 649677.
  • Ruthven, K. (2001). Issues of cultural diversity in school mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 32, 355364.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 122.
  • Silver, E. A., Smith, M. S., & Nelson, B. S. (1995). The QUASAR Project: Equity concerns meet mathematics education reform in the middle school. In W. G.Secada, E.Fennema, & L. B.Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 956). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Simmons, P. E., Emory, A., Carter, T., Coker, T., Finnegan, B., Crockett, D., et al. (1999). Beginning teachers: Beliefs and classroom actions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 930954.
  • Stanley, W. B., & Brickhouse, N. W. (1994). Multiculturalism, universalism, and science education. Science Education, 78, 387398.
  • Stanley, W. B., & Brickhouse, N. W. (2001). Teaching sciences: The multicultural question revisited. Science Education, 85(1), 3549.
  • Stoddart, T., Pinal, A., Latzke, M., & Canaday, D. (2002). Integrating inquiry science and language development for English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(8), 664687.
  • Sweeney, A. E., Bula, E. A., & Cornett, J. W. (2001). The role of personal practice theories in the professional development of a beginning high school chemistry teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 408441.
  • Thompson, M., Paek, P., Goe, L., & Ponte, E. (2004a). Study of the impact of the California Formative Assessment and Support System for Teachers: Report 2, Relationship of BTSA/CFASST engagement and teacher practices (CFASST Rep. No. 2, ETS RR-04-31). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Retrieved February 17, 2005, from http://www.ets.org/research/newpubs.html
  • Thompson, M., Paek, P., Goe, L., & Ponte, E. (2004b). Study of the impact of the California Formative Assessment and Support System for Teachers: Report 3, Relationship of BTSA/CFASST engagement and student achievement (CFASST Rep. No. 3, ETS RR-04-32). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Retrieved February 17, 2005, from http://www.ets.org/research/newpubs.html
  • Tieso, C. (2005). The effects of grouping practices and curricular adjustments on achievement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29, 6089.
  • Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • van Zee, E., Lay, D., & Roberts, D. (2003). Fostering collaborative inquiries by prospective and practicing elementary and middle school teachers. Science Education, 87, 588612.
  • Wang, J., & Odell, S. (2002). Mentored learning to teach according to standards-based reform: A critical review. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 481546.
  • Wang, J., Odell, S. J., & Schwille, S. A. (2008). Effects of teacher induction on beginning teachers' teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(2), 132152.
  • Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonoswki, M., Rosebery, A. S., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 529552.
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wilkins, M. M., Wilkins, J. L. M., & Oliver, T. (2006). Differentiating the curriculum for elementary gifted mathematics students. Teaching Children Mathematics, 13(1), 613.
  • Willis, S. (1996). Gender justice and the mathematics curriculum: Four perspectives. In L.Parker, L.Rennie, & B.Fraser (Eds.), Gender, science and mathematics: Shortening the shadow (pp. 4152). Boston: Kluwer.