• Aikenhead, G. S., & Jegede, O. J. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(3), 269287.
  • Barrows, H. S. (1987). Simulated (standardized) patients and other human simulations: A comprehensive guide to their training and use in teaching and evaluation. Chapel Hill, NC: Health Sciences Consortium.
  • Barrows, H. S. (2000). Problem-based learning applied to medical education. Springfield: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Clough, M. P. (1994). Diminish students' resistance to biological evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 56(7), 409415.
  • Donnelly, L. A., Kazempour, M., & Amirshokoohi, A. (2008). High school students' perceptions of evolution instruction: Acceptance and evolution learning experiences. Research in Science Education, published online August 21, 2008,
  • Dotger, B. (Under review). “I had no idea”: Developing dispositional awareness and sensitivity through a cross-professional pedagogy.
  • Dotger, B., & Ashby, C. (In press). Exposing conditional inclusive ideologies through simulated interactions. Teacher Education and Special Education.
  • Dotger, B., Harris, S., & Hansel, A. (2008). Emerging authenticity: The crafting of simulated parent–teacher candidate conferences. Teaching Education, 19(4), 335347.
  • Dotger, B., Harris, S., Maher, M., & Hansel, A. (Under review). Exploring the emotional geographies of parent–teacher candidate interactions: An emergent signature pedagogy.
  • Dotger, B., & Smith, M. (2009). ‘Where's the line?’—Negotiating simulated experiences to define teacher identity. The New Educator, 5(2), 161180.
  • Hargreaves, A. (2000). Mixed emotions: Teachers' perceptions of their interactions with students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 811826.
  • Lawrence-Lightfoot, S. (2003). The essential conversation: What parents and teachers can learn from each other. New York: Ballantine Books.
  • McComas, W. F. (2000). The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Meadows, L., Doster, E., & Jackson, D. F. (2000). Managing the conflict between evolution and religion. American Biology Teacher, 62, 102107.
  • Moore, R. (2001). Educational malpractice: Why do so many biology teachers endorse creationism? Skeptical Inquirer, 25, 3843.
  • Moore, R. (2002). Evolution in the courtroom: A reference guide. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
  • Moore, R. (2004). How well do biology teachers understand the legal issues associated with the teaching of evolution? BioScience, 54(9), 860865.
  • Moore, R., & Kraemer, K. (2005). The teaching of evolution and creationism in Minnesota. The American Biology Teacher, 67(8), 457466.
  • National Center for Science Education (2009). Recent news. Retrieved March 1, 2009, from
  • Pigliucci, M. (2007). The evolution–creation wars: Why teaching more science just is not enough. McGill Journal of Education, 42(2), 285306.
  • Rutledge, M. L., & Mitchell, M. A. (2002). High school biology teachers' knowledge structure, acceptance, and teaching of evolution. American Biology Teacher, 64, 2128.
  • Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., McConaughy, F., & Demastes, J. W. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students' understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 510528.
  • Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus (Summer), 5259.
  • Skoog, G., & Bilica, K. (2002). The emphasis given to evolution in state science standards: A lever for change in evolution education? Science Education, 86(9), 445462.
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wiles, J. R., & Ashgar, A. (2007). An effort to encourage dialogue around the teaching and learning of evolution. McGill Journal of Education, 42(2), 167170.