SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alonzo, A. C., & Steedle, J. T. (2009). Developing and assessing a force and motion learning progression. Science Education, 93, 389421.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1999). Atlas of science literacy (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: AAAS Project 2061.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2007). Atlas of science literacy (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: AAAS Project 2061.
  • Ametller, T., & Pinto, R. (2002). Students' reading of innovative images of energy at secondary school level. International Journal of Science Education, 24(3), 285312.
  • Barak, J., Gorodetsky, M., & Chipman, D. (1997). Understanding of energy in biology and vitalistic conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 19(1), 2130.
  • Baxter, G. P., & Glaser, R. (1998). Investigating the cognitive complexity of science assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17(3), 3745.
  • Becu-Robinault, K., & Tiberghien, A. (1998). Integrating experiments into the teaching of energy. International Journal of Science Education, 20(1), 99114.
  • Bliss, J., & Ogborn, J. (1985). Children's choices of uses of energy. International Journal of Science Education, 7(2), 195203.
  • Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Briggs, D. C., Alonzo, A. C., Schwab, C., & Wilson, M. (2006). Diagnostic assessment with ordered multiple-choice items. Educational Assessment, 11(1), 3363.
  • Catley, K., Lehrer, R., & Reiser, B. (2005). Tracing a prospective learning progression for developing understanding of evolution. The National Academies Committee on Test Design for K-12 Science Achievement.
  • Chaisson, E. J. (2001). Cosmic evolution: The rise of complexity in nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Chisholm, D. (1992). Some energetic thoughts. Physics Education, 27, 215220.
  • Clough, E. E., & Driver, R. (1985) Secondary students' conceptions of the conduction of heat: bringing together scientific and personal views. Physics Education, 20, 176182.
  • Cohen, I. B. (1974). Foreword. In Y.Elkana (Ed.), The discovery of the conservation of energy (pp xixiv). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Driver, R., & Warrington, L. (1985). Students' use of the principle of energy conservation in problem situations. Physics Education, 20, 171176.
  • Duit, R. (1984). Learning the energy concept in school-empirical results from the Philippines and West Germany. Physics Education, 19, 5966.
  • Duit, R., & Kesidou, S. (1988). Students' understanding of basic ideas of the second law of thermodynamics, Research in Science Education, 18, 186195.
  • Duncan, R. G., Rogat, A. D., & Yarden, A. (2009). A learning progression for deepening students' understandings of modern genetics across the 5th–10th grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 655674.
  • Elise, M. (1988). Transferring not transforming energy. School Science Review, 69, 427437.
  • Erickson, G. L. (1979). Children's conceptions of heat and temperature. Science Education, 63, 221230.
  • Erickson, G. L. (1980). Children's viewpoints of heat: A second look. Science Education, 64, 323336.
  • Ferraro, D., & Van de Kerckhove, W. (2006). Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2003 Nonresponse Bias Analysis (NCES 2007–044). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved November 10, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch.
  • Goldring, H., & Osborne, J. (1994). Students' difficulties with energy and related concepts. Physics Education, 29, 2632.
  • Harrison, A. G., Grayson, D. J., & Treagust, D. F. (1999). Investigating a grade 11 student's evolving conceptions of heat and temperature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 5587.
  • International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. (1995a). TIMSS science items: Released set for population 1 (third and fourth grades). Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
  • International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. (1995b). TIMSS 1999 science items: Released set for population 2 (seventh and eighth grades). Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
  • International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. (1999). TIMSS 2003 science items: Released set eighth grade. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
  • International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. (2003). TIMSS science items: Released set for eighth grade. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
  • Kaper, W. H., & Goedhart, M. J. (2002). “Forms of energy,” an intermediary language on the road to thermodynamics? Part I. International Journal of Science Education, 24(1), 8195.
  • Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2004). Test equating, scaling, and linking: Methods and practices. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Kruger, C., Palacio, D., & Summers, M. (1992). Surveys of English primary teachers' conceptions of force, energy, and materials. Science Education, 76(4), 339351.
  • Lee, H.-S., Linn, M. C., Varma, K., & Liu, O. L. (in press). How does technology-enhanced inquiry instruction with visualizations impact classroom learning? Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
  • Lee, H.-S., Liu, O. L., & Linn, M. C. (in press). Validating measurement of knowledge integration in science using multiple-choice and explanation items. Applied Measurement in Education.
  • Lewis, E. L., & Linn, M. C. (1994). Heat energy and temperature concepts of adolescents, adults, and experts: Implications for curricular improvements. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(6), 657677.
  • Lijnse, P. (1990). Energy between the life-world of pupils and the world of physics. Science Education, 74(5), 571583.
  • Lin, C.-Y., & Hu, R. (2003). Students' understanding of energy flow and matter cycling in the context of the food chain, photosynthesis, and respiration. International Journal of Science Education, 25(12), 15291544.
  • Lindsay, R. B. (Ed.). (1975). Energy: historical development of the concept. New York: Dowden, Hutchinson, & Ross.
  • Linn, M. C. (2006). The knowledge integration perspective on learning and instruction. In K.Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 243264). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Linn, M. C., & Eylon, B. -S. (2006). Science education: Integrating views of learning and instruction. In P. A.Alexander & P. H.Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 511544). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Liu, O. L., Lee, H. S., Hofstetter, C., & Linn, M. C. (2008). Assessing knowledge integration in science: Construct, measures, and evidence. Educational Assessment, 13(1), 123.
  • Liu, X., Ebenezer, J., & Fraser, D. M. (2002). Structural characteristics of university engineering students' conceptions of energy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(5), 423441.
  • Liu, X., & McKeough, A. (2005). Developmental growth in students' concept of energy: Analysis of selected items from the TIMSS database. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 493517.
  • Marco, G. L. (1977). Item characteristics curve solutions to three intractable testing problems. Journal of Educational Measurement, 14, 139160.
  • McIldowie, E. (1995). Energy transfer—Where did we go wrong? Physics Education, 30(4), 228230.
  • McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students' construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153191.
  • Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L.Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 13103). Phoenix, AZ: The Oryx Press.
  • National Assessment Governing Board. (2004). Science framework for the 2005 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
  • National Center for Education Statistics (2007). Mapping 2005 state proficiency standards onto the NAEP scales (NCES 2007-482). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: Author.
  • National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2007). PISA 2006 science competencies for tomorrow's world. Paris: Author.
  • Papadouris, N., Constantinou, C. P., & Kyratsi, T. (2008). Students' use of the energy model to account for changes in physical systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 444469.
  • Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing what students know. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
  • Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests (Copenhagen, Danish Institute for Educational Research), expanded edition (1980) with foreword and afterword by B. D. Wright. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1960)
  • Sandoval, W. A. (2003). Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students' scientific explanations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 551.
  • Schmid, G. B. (1982). Energy and its carriers. Physics Education, 17, 212218.
  • Sexl, R. U. (1981). Some observations concerning the teaching of the energy concept. European Journal of Science Education, 3, 285289.
  • Smith, C., Wiser, M., Anderson, C. W., & Krajcik, J. (2006). Implications of research on children's learning for standards and assessment: A proposed learning progression for matter and atomic-molecular theory. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 14(1&2), 198.
  • Solomon, J. (1985). Teaching the conservation of energy. Physics Education, 20, 165170.
  • Songer, N. B., Kelcey B., & Gotwals, A. W. (2009). How and when does complex reasoning occur? Empirically driven development of a learning progression focused on complex reasoning about biodiversity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 610631.
  • Steedle, J. T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2009). Supporting valid interpretations of learning progression level diagnoses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 699715.
  • Stylianidou, F., Ormerod, F., & Ogborn, J. (2002). Analysis of science textbook pictures about energy and pupils' readings of them. International Journal of Science Education, 24(3), 257283.
  • Trumper, R. (1990). Energy and a constructivist way of teaching. Physics Education, 21, 208212.
  • Trumper, R. (1991). Being constructive: An alternative approach to the teaching of the energy concept—Part two. International Journal of Science Education, 13(1), 110.
  • Warren, J. W. (1983). Energy and its carriers: A critical analysis. Physics Education, 18, 209212.
  • Watts, D. M. (1983). Some alternative views of energy. Physics Education, 18, 213217.
  • Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Wilson, M. (2009). Measuring progressions: Assessment structures underlying a learning progression. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 716730.
  • Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago: Mesa Press.
  • Wu, M., Adams, R., & Wilson, M. (1997). ConQuest: Generalized item response modeling software. Melbourne, Australia: ACER Press.
  • Yeh, S. S. (2001). Tests worth teaching to: Constructing state-mandated tests that emphasize critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 30(9), 1217.