SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Waters, M., & Le, A. (2008). Representation of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 835855.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy, Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Bevilacqua, F., & Bordoni, S. (1998). New contents for new media: Pavia project physics. Science & Education, 7, 451469.
  • Borowitz, S., & Bornstein, L. A. (1968). A contemporary view of elementary physics (1st ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Brush, S. G. (2000). Thomas Kuhn as a historian of science. Science and Education, 9, 3958.
  • Chiappetta, E. L., Ganesh, T. G., Lee, Y. H., & Phillips, M. C. (2006). Examination of science textbook analysis research conducted on textbooks published over the past 100 years in the United States. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, CA.
  • Council of Ministers of Education, Canada. (1997). Common framework of science learning outcomes K to 12: Pan-Canadian protocol for collaboration on school curriculum. Toronto, ON: Author.
  • Dull, C. E., Metcalfe, H. H., & Williams, J. E. (1964). Modern physics (1st ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Einstein, A. (1905). Über einen Erzeugung und Verwandlung des lichtes betreffenden heuristischen Gesichtspunkt. Annalen der Physik, 17, 132148.
  • Einstein, A. (1916). Zur quantentheorie der strahlung. Zürich Mitteilungen, 18, 4762.
  • Halliday, D., & Resnick, R. (1962). Physics for students of science and engineering combined edition (1st ed.). New York: Wiley.
  • Halliday, D., & Resnick, R. (1981). Fundamentals of physics (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
  • Hecht, E. (1998). Physics: Algebra/trig (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Hecht, E. (2003). Physics: Algebra/trig (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole.
  • Hertz, H. (1883). Über Kathodenstrahlen. Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 19, 782.
  • Hertz, H. (1887). Über einen Einfluss des ultravioletten lichtes auf die elektrische Entladung. Annalen der Physik, 31, 9831000.
  • Holton, G. (1978). Subelectrons, presuppositions, and the Millikan–Ehrenhaft dispute. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 9, 161224.
  • Holton, G. (1998). The scientific imagination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Holton, G. (1999). R. A. Millikan's struggle with the meaning of Planck's constant. Physics in Perspective, 1, 231237.
  • Hurd, P. (1958). Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools. Educational Leadership, 16, 1316.
  • Jammer, M. (1966). The conceptual development of quantum mechanics. New York, McGraw-Hill.
  • Jones, R. C. (1995). The Millikan oil-drop experiment: Making it worthwhile. American Journal of Physics, 63, 970977.
  • Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. (1999). A cause of ahistorical science teaching: Use of hybrid models. Science Education, 83, 163177.
  • Kesidou, S., & Roseman, J. E. (2002). How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 522549.
  • Klassen, S. (2006). A theoretical framework for contextual science teaching. Interchange, 37(12), 31–62.
  • Klassen, S. (2009a). Identifying and addressing student difficulties with the Millikan oil drop experiment. Science & Education, 18, 593607.
  • Klassen, S. (2009b). The photoelectric effect: Reconstructing the story for the physics classroom. Science & Education, published online DOI 10.1007/s11191-009-9214-6.
  • Kuhn, T. (1963). The function of dogma in scientific research. In A. C.Crombie (Ed.), Scientific change (pp. 347369). New York: Basic Books.
  • Kuhn, T. (1978). Black-body theory and the quantum discontinuity: 1894–1912. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Kuhn, T. (1983). Foreword. In B.Wheaton (Ed.), The tiger and the shark: Empirical roots of wave-particle dualism (pp ixxiii). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1962)
  • Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I.Lakatos & A.Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91195). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lea, S. M., & Burke, J. R. (1997). Physics: The nature of things (1st ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Leite, L. (2002). History of science in science education: Development and validation of a checklist for analyzing the historical content of science textbooks. Science & Education, 11, 333359.
  • Lenard, P. E. A. (1902). Über die Lichtelektrischewirkung. Annalen der Physik, 8, 149198.
  • McCormick, W. W. (1965). Fundamentals of college physics (1st ed.). New York: Macmillan.
  • McGervey, J. D. (1983). Introduction to modern physics (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
  • Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000. Science education for the future. London: School of Education, King's College London. Retrieved 29 December 2009 from http://www.york.ac.uk/depts/educ/research/Beyond%202000.pdf.
  • Millikan, R. A. (1913a). On the cause of the apparent differences between spark and arc sources in the imparting of initial speeds to photo-electrons. Physical Review, 1, 7375.
  • Millikan, R. A. (1913b). On the elementary electrical charge and the Avogadro constant. Physical Review, 2, 109143.
  • Millikan, R. A. (1914). A direct determination of “h.” Physical Review, 4, 7375.
  • Millikan, R. A. (1915). New tests of Einstein's photo-electric equation. Physical Review, 6, 55.
  • Millikan, R. A. (1916a). Einstein's photoelectric equation and contact electromotive force. Physical Review, 7, 1832.
  • Millikan, R. A. (1916b). A direct photoelectric determination of Planck's “h.” Physical Review, 7, 355388.
  • Millikan, R. A. (1924). The electron and the light quant from the experimental point of view. Nobel Lecture. Retrieved May 28, 2009, from http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1923/millikan-lecture.html
  • Millikan, R. A. (1950). The autobiography of Robert A. Millikan. New York: Prentice-Hall.
  • Millikan, R. A. (1965). The electron and the light-quant from the experimental point of view (Nobel Prize acceptance speech delivered on May 23, 1924) Nobel lectures. (pp. 5466). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Millikan, R. A., & Winchester, G. (1907). Influence of temperature on photo-electric effects in a very high vacuum. Philosophical Magazine, 14, 191.
  • Niaz, M. (1998). From cathode rays to alpha particles to quantum of action: A rational reconstruction of structure of the atom and its implications for chemistry textbooks. Science Education, 82, 527552.
  • Niaz, M. (2000). The oil drop experiment: A rational reconstruction of the Millikan–Ehrenhaft controversy and its implications for chemistry textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 480508.
  • Niaz, M. (2005). An appraisal of the controversial nature of the oil drop experiment: Is closure possible? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 56, 681702.
  • Niaz, M. (2008). Do we need to write physical science textbooks within a history and philosophy of science perspective. In M. V.Thomase (Ed.), Science education in focus (pp. 55105). New York: Nova Science.
  • Niaz, M. (2009). Critical appraisal of physical science as a human enterprise: Dynamics of scientific progress. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • Nolan, P. J. (1995). Fundamentals of college physics volume 2 (2nd ed.). Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
  • Noyes, P. (1984). The downfall of determinism. Physics Today, 37(10), 95.
  • Padilla, K., & Furio-Mas, C. (2008). The importance of history and philosophy of science in correcting distorted views of ‘amount of substance’ and ‘mole’ concepts in chemistry teaching. Science & Education, 17, 403424.
  • Pais, A. (1982). ‘Subtle is the Lord … ’ The science and the life of Albert Einstein. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Planck, M. (1913). Über das Gleichgewicht zwischen Oszillatoren, freien Elektronen und strahlender wärme. Berlin Sitzungsberichte, 350363.
  • Radin, S. H., & Folk, R. T. (1982). Physics for scientists and engineers (1st ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Richtmyer, F. K., Kennard, E. H., & Lauritsen, T. (1955). Introduction to modern physics (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Rodríguez, M., & Niaz, M. (2004a). A reconstruction of structure of the atom and its implications for general physics textbooks. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13, 409424.
  • Rodríguez, M. A., & Niaz, M. (2004b). The oil drop experiment: An illustration of scientific research methodology and its implications for physics textbooks. Instructional Science, 32, 357386.
  • Rutherford, E. (1911). The scattering of alpha and beta particles by matter and the structure of the atom. Philosophical Magazine, 21, 669688.
  • Rutherford, F. J., & Algren, A. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Rutherford, F. J., Holton, G., & Watson, F. G. (1970). Project physics. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
  • Serway, R. A., & Faughn, J. S. (1995). College physics (4th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Saunders College.
  • Stinner, A., McMillan, B., Metz, D., Jilek, J., & Klassen, S. (2003). The renewal of case studies in science education. Science & Education, 12(7), 617643.
  • Thomson, J. J. (1897). Cathode rays. Philosophical Magazine, 44, 293316.
  • Thomson, J. J. (1925). Structure of light. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Van Berkel, B., DeVos, W., Verdonk, A. H., & Pilot, A. (2000). Normal science education and its dangers: The case of school chemistry. Science & Education, 9, 123159.
  • Weidner, R. T., & Browne, M. E. (1985). Physics (1st ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Wheaton, B. R. (1978). Philipp Lenard and the photoelectric effect, 1889–1911. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 9, 199322.
  • Wheaton, B. R. (1983). The tiger and the shark: Empirical roots of wave-particle dualism. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Williams, D., & Spangler, J. (1981). Physics for science and engineering (1st ed.). New York: Van Nostrand.
  • Wilson, D. (1983). Rutherford: Simple genius. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Wright, W. R. (1937). The photoelectric determination of h as an undergraduate experiment. American Journal of Physics, 5(2), 6567.