SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Aikenhead, G. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 152.
  • Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, et al. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Addison-Wesley Longman, Inc.
  • Atwater, M. M. (1990). A response to “Nurturing talent for science.” Paper presented at Proceedings of the Society for College Science Teachers, Cedar City, UT.
  • Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Barton, A. C., Ermer, J., Burkett, T., & Osborne, M. (2003). Teaching science for social justice. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Bloom, H. S., Hill, C. J., Black, A. R., & Lipsey, M. W. (2009). Performance trajectories and performance gaps as achievement effect-size benchmarks for educational interventions. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1(4), 289328.
  • Bouillion, L. M., & Gomez, L. M. (2001). Connecting school and community with science learning: Real-world problems and school-community partnerships as contextual scaffolds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 878898.
  • Bransford, J., Darling-Hammond, L., & LePage, P. (2007). Introduction. In L.Darling-Hammond & J.Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 136). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Cannon, R. K., & Simpson, R. D. (1985). Relationships among attitude, motivation, and achievement of ability grouped, seventh-grade, life science students. Science Education, 69(2), 121138.
  • Cobern, W. (1996). Worldview theory and conceptual change in science education. Science Education, 80(5), 579610.
  • Committee on Science Learning, Kindergarten Through Eighth Grade. (2007). Learning progressions. In R. A.Duschl, H. A.Schweingruber, & A. W.Shouse (Eds.), Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8 (pp. 213250). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Consolazio, F. C., Johnson, R. E., & Pecora, L. J. (1963). Physiological measurements of metabolic functions in man. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Druva, C. A., & Anderson, R. D. (1983). Science teacher characteristics by teacher behaviour and by student outcome: A meta-analysis of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 467479.
  • Eccles, J. S., Vida, M. N., & Barber, B. (2004). The relation of early adolescents' college plans and both academic ability and task-value beliefs to subsequent college enrollment. Journal of Early Adolescence, 24(1), 6377.
  • Edelson, D. C. (2001). Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 355385.
  • George, R. (2006). Cross-domain analysis of change in students' attitudes toward science and attitudes about the utility of science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 571589.
  • Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge: An introduction and orientation. In J.Gess-Newsome & N. G.Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 317). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
  • Haberman, M. (1991). The pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 290294.
  • Haladyna, T., & Shaughnessy, J. (1982). Attitudes toward science: A quantitative synthesis. Science Education, 66, 547563.
  • Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Bransford, J., Berliner, D., Cochran-Smith, M., McDonald, M. et al. (2007). How teachers learn and develop. In L.Darling-Hammond & J.Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 358389). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Henze, I., Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2007). Science teachers' knowledge about teaching models and modelling in the context of a new syllabus on public understanding of science. Research in Science Education, 37(2), 99122.
  • Hill, G., Atwater, M., & Wiggins, J. (1995). Attitudes toward science of urban seventh-grade life science students over time, and the relationship to future plans, family, teacher, curriculum, and school. Urban Education, 30, 7192.
  • Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371406.
  • Johnson, C. C., Kahle, J. B., & Fargo, J. D. (2006). Effective teaching results in increased science achievement for all students. Science Education, 91(3), 371383.
  • Kahle, J. B., Meece, J., & Scantlebury, K. (2000). Urban African American middle school science students: Does standards-based teaching make a difference? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 9, 10191041.
  • Kanter, D. E. (2009). Doing the project and learning the content: Designing project-based science curricula for meaningful understanding. Science Education. Published online. doi: 10.1002.sce.20381.
  • Kanter, D. E., Kemp, E., & Reiser, B. (2001). Teaching middle school human biology through biomedical engineering-based project contexts. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education IL/IN Sectional Conference, West Lafayette, IN.
  • Kanter, D. E., Kemp, E., & Tester, K. (2006, April). Learning, teaching, and representing human biology pedagogical content knowledge. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 2006 National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA.
  • Kanter, D. E., & Schreck, M. A. (2006). Learning content using complex data in project-based science: An example from high school biology in urban classrooms. New Directions in Teaching and Learning, 108, 7791.
  • King, K. P., Shumow, L., & Lietz, S. (2001). Science education in an urban elementary school: Case studies of teacher beliefs and classroom practices. Science Education, 85(2), 89110.
  • Koballa, T. R., Jr., (1988). Attitudes and related concepts in science education. Science Education, 72, 115126.
  • Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B. B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., et al. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495547.
  • Krajcik, J. S., McNeill, K. L., & Reiser, B. J. (2008). Learning-goals-driven design model: Developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project-based pedagogy. Science Education, 92(1), 132.
  • Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465491.
  • Lee, E., & Luft, J. A. (2008). Experienced secondary science teachers' representation of pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 13431363.
  • Linn, M. C., Bell, P., & Davis, E. A. (2004). Internet environments for science education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P., Love, N., & Stiles, K. (1997). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Loughran J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2008). Exploring pedagogical content knowledge in science teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 13011320.
  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J.Gess-Newsome & N. G.Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
  • Marsh, H. (1990). The structure of academic self-concept: The Marsh/Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 623636.
  • Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., Geier, R., et al. (2004). Inquiry-based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 10631080.
  • Midgley, C., Maehr, M., Hruda, L., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K., et al. (2000). Manual for the patterns of adaptive learning scales (PALS). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
  • MSALT—The Michigan Study of Adolescent and Adult Life Transitions. (n.d.). MSALT–For Researchers. Retrieved December 8, 2005, from http://www.rcgd.isr.umich.edu/msalt/researchers.htm.
  • Mullens, J. E., Murnane, R. J., & Willett, J. B. (1996). The contribution of training and subject matter knowledge to teaching effectiveness: A multilevel analysis of longitudinal evidence from Belize. Comparative Education Review, 40, 139157.
  • National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Statistics (2007). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering (NSF 07-315). Arlington, VA: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Nolen, S. B. (2003). Learning environment, motivation, and achievement in high school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(4), 347368.
  • Patchen, T., & Cox-Petersen, A. (2008). Constructing cultural relevance in science: A case study of two elementary teachers. Science Education, 92(6), 9941014.
  • Puntambekar, S., & Kolodner, J. L. (2005). Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science from design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 185217.
  • Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29, 415.
  • Rivet, A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2004). Achieving standards in urban systemic reform: An example of a sixth grade project-based science curriculum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(7), 669692.
  • Rowan, B., Chiang, F., & Miller, R. J. (1997). Using research on employees' performance to study the effects of teachers on students' achievement. Sociology of Education, 70, 256284.
  • Schneider, R. M. (2002). Performance of students in project-based science classrooms on a national measure of science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(5), 410422.
  • Schneider, R. M., Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2005). Enacting reform-based science materials: The range of teacher enactments in reform classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(3), 283312.
  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 122.
  • Simpson, R. D., & Oliver, J. S. (1990). A summary of major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students. Science Education, 74(1), 118.
  • Singer, J., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., & Chambers, J. C. (2000). Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education reform. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 165178.
  • Vondracek, F. W., Silbereisen, R. K., Reitzle, M., & Wiesner, M. (1999). Vocational preferences of early adolescents: Their development in social context. Journal of Adolescent Research, 14, 267288.
  • Yager, R. E., Simmons, P. E., & Penick, J. E. (1989). Student perceptions of the usefulness of school science experiences. School Science and Mathematics, 89(4), 313319.