SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    P.-S. Hsu, M. Van Dyke, Y. Chen, T.J. Smith, A cross-cultural study of the effect of a graph-oriented computer-assisted project-based learning environment on middle school students' science knowledge and argumentation skills, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2016, 32, 1
  2. 2
    Michael B. Wolfe, Christopher A. Kurby, Belief in the Claim of an Argument Increases Perceived Argument Soundness, Discourse Processes, 2016, 0

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Ming-Chin Hsin, Sung-pei Chien, Yin-Shao Hsu, Chen-Yung Lin, Larry D. Yore, DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A TAIWANESE COMMUNICATION PROGRESSION IN SCIENCE EDUCATION, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2016, 14, S1, 125

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Ying-Chih Chen, Brian Hand, Soonhye Park, Examining Elementary Students’ Development of Oral and Written Argumentation Practices Through Argument-Based Inquiry, Science & Education, 2016, 25, 3-4, 277

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Barbara C. Wheatley, Hope K. Gerde, Sonia Q. Cabell, Integrating Early Writing Into Science Instruction in Preschool, The Reading Teacher, 2016, 69, 6
  6. 6
    ANDY R. CAVAGNETTO, KENNETH J. KURTZ, Promoting Students’ Attention to Argumentative Reasoning Patterns, Science Education, 2016, 100, 3
  7. 7
    Elizabeth Jewett, Deanna Kuhn, Social science as a tool in developing scientific thinking skills in underserved, low-achieving urban students, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2016, 143, 154

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Perry D. Klein, Katrina N. Haug, Nina Arcon, The Effects of Rhetorical and Content Subgoals on Writing and Learning, The Journal of Experimental Education, 2016, 1

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    DEANNA KUHN, What Do Young Science Students Need to Learn About Variables?, Science Education, 2016, 100, 2
  10. 10
    Ulises Xolocotzin, Chloe Shu-Hua Yeh, Sibel Erduran, Emotions, Technology, and Behaviors, 2016,

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    Francesco Arcidiacono, Antonio Bova, Activity-bound and activity-unbound arguments in response to parental eat-directives at mealtimes: Differences and similarities in children of 3–5 and 6–9years old, Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2015, 6, 40

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Bradley J. Morris, Amy M. Masnick, Katie Baker, Angela Junglen, An Analysis of Data Activities and Instructional Supports in Middle School Science Textbooks, International Journal of Science Education, 2015, 37, 16, 2708

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Pattaraporn Amornchai, Jaitip Na Songkhla, Siridej Sujiva, An Argument Performance Task in a Virtual Classroom for Enhancing Graduate Students’ Analytical Reasoning, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, 174, 1031

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Su-Kyeong Park, Analysis on the Argumentation Pattern and Level of Students' Mental Models in Modeling-based Learning about Geologic Structures, Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 2015, 35, 5, 919

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Fabrizio Macagno, Elisabeth Mayweg-Paus, Deanna Kuhn, Argumentation Theory in Education Studies: Coding and Improving Students’ Argumentative Strategies, Topoi, 2015, 34, 2, 523

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Mehmet Aydeniz, Zehra Ozdilek, Assessing and Enhancing Pre-service Science Teachers’ Self-Efficacy to Teach Science Through Argumentation: Challenges and Possible Solutions, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2015,

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Claudia Zanini, Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini, Fabiola Atzeni, Manuela Di Franco, Sara Rubinelli, Building bridges between doctors and patients: the design and pilot evaluation of a training session in argumentation for chronic pain experts, BMC Medical Education, 2015, 15, 1

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Robert Anthony, Mijung Kim, Challenges and Remedies for Identifying and Classifying Argumentation Schemes, Argumentation, 2015, 29, 1, 81

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    Amy Pallant, Hee-Sun Lee, Constructing Scientific Arguments Using Evidence from Dynamic Computational Climate Models, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2015, 24, 2-3, 378

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    Danielle K. Ross, Jennifer L. Cartier, Developing Pre-service Elementary Teachers’ Pedagogical Practices While Planning Using the Learning Cycle, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2015, 26, 6, 573

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    Pi-Sui Hsu, Margot Van Dyke, Yan Chen, Examining the Effect of Teacher Guidance on Collaborative Argumentation in Middle Level Classrooms, RMLE Online, 2015, 38, 9, 1

    CrossRef

  22. 22
    Robyn M. Gillies, Kim Nichols, How to Support Primary Teachers’ Implementation of Inquiry: Teachers’ Reflections on Teaching Cooperative Inquiry-Based Science, Research in Science Education, 2015, 45, 2, 171

    CrossRef

  23. 23
    Sarit Barzilai, Michael Weinstock, Measuring epistemic thinking within and across topics: A scenario-based approach, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2015, 42, 141

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    Brian R. Belland, Jiangyue Gu, Sara Armbrust, Brant Cook, Scaffolding argumentation about water quality: a mixed-method study in a rural middle school, Educational Technology Research and Development, 2015, 63, 3, 325

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    KALYPSO IORDANOU, COSTAS P. CONSTANTINOU, Supporting Use of Evidence in Argumentation Through Practice in Argumentation and Reflection in the Context of SOCRATES Learning Environment, Science Education, 2015, 99, 2
  26. 26
    Flávio S. Azevedo, Peggy L. Martalock, Tugba Keser, The discourse of design-based science classroom activities, Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2015, 10, 2, 285

    CrossRef

  27. 27
    P.-S. Hsu, M. Van Dyke, Y. Chen, T.J. Smith, The effect of a graph-oriented computer-assisted project-based learning environment on argumentation skills, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2015, 31, 1
  28. 28
    Mijung Kim, Wolff-Michael Roth, Argumentation as/in/for dialogical relation: a case study from elementary school science, Pedagogies: An International Journal, 2014, 9, 4, 300

    CrossRef

  29. 29
    Hee-Sun Lee, Ou Lydia Liu, Amy Pallant, Katrina Crotts Roohr, Sarah Pryputniewicz, Zoë E. Buck, Assessment of uncertainty-infused scientific argumentation, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2014, 51, 5
  30. 30
    Kalypso Iordanou, C.P. Constantinou, Developing pre-service teachers' evidence-based argumentation skills on socio-scientific issues, Learning and Instruction, 2014, 34, 42

    CrossRef

  31. 31
    Markus H. Hefter, Kirsten Berthold, Alexander Renkl, Werner Riess, Sebastian Schmid, Stefan Fries, Effects of a training intervention to foster argumentation skills while processing conflicting scientific positions, Instructional Science, 2014, 42, 6, 929

    CrossRef

  32. 32
    Aeran Choi, Brian Hand, Lori Norton-Meier, Grade 5 Students’ Online Argumentation about Their In-Class Inquiry Investigations, Research in Science Education, 2014, 44, 2, 267

    CrossRef

  33. 33
    Savreen Hundal, Daniel M. Levin, Alla Keselman, Lessons of Researcher–Teacher Co-design of an Environmental Health Afterschool Club Curriculum, International Journal of Science Education, 2014, 36, 9, 1510

    CrossRef

  34. 34
    Shu-Sheng Lin, SCIENCE AND NON-SCIENCE UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS’ CRITICAL THINKING AND ARGUMENTATION PERFORMANCE IN READING A SCIENCE NEWS REPORT, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2014, 12, 5, 1023

    CrossRef

  35. 35
    Jiwon Shin, Aeran Choi, Trends in Research Studies on Scientific Argument and Writing in Korea, Journal of The Korean Association For Research In Science Education, 2014, 34, 2, 107

    CrossRef

  36. 36
    Maggie Renken, Carmen Carrion, Ellen Litkowski, Inquiry-based Learning for Faculty and Institutional Development: A Conceptual and Practical Resource for Educators, 2014,

    CrossRef

  37. 37
    Nicolai Basel, Ute Harms, Helmut Prechtl, Analysis of students’ arguments on evolutionary theory, Journal of Biological Education, 2013, 47, 4, 192

    CrossRef

  38. 38
    Mehmet Aydeniz, Deniz Gürçay, Assessing quality of pre-service physics teachers’ written arguments, Research in Science & Technological Education, 2013, 31, 3, 269

    CrossRef

  39. You have free access to this content39
    STEPHANIE CLAUSSEN, JONATHAN OSBORNE, Bourdieu's notion of cultural capital and its implications for the science curriculum, Science Education, 2013, 97, 1
  40. 40
    Luciana Passos Sá, Ana Cláudia Kasseboehmer, Salete Linhares Queiroz, Casos investigativos de caráter sociocientífico: aplicação no ensino superior de Química, Educación Química, 2013, 24, 522

    CrossRef

  41. 41
    Kalypso Iordanou, Developing Face-to-Face Argumentation Skills: Does Arguing on the Computer Help?, Journal of Cognition and Development, 2013, 14, 2, 292

    CrossRef

  42. 42
    Deanna Kuhn, Nicole Zillmer, Amanda Crowell, Julia Zavala, Developing Norms of Argumentation: Metacognitive, Epistemological, and Social Dimensions of Developing Argumentive Competence, Cognition and Instruction, 2013, 31, 4, 456

    CrossRef

  43. 43
    Marcel Koeneman, Martin Goedhart, Miriam Ossevoort, Introducing Pre-university Students to Primary Scientific Literature Through Argumentation Analysis, Research in Science Education, 2013, 43, 5, 2009

    CrossRef

  44. 44
    Shu-Mey Yu, Larry D. Yore, Quality, Evolution, and Positional Change of University Students’ Argumentation Patterns About Organic Agriculture During an Argument–Critique–Argument Experience, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2013, 11, 5, 1233

    CrossRef

  45. 45
    Nicole Becker, Chris Rasmussen, George Sweeney, Megan Wawro, Marcy Towns, Renee Cole, Reasoning using particulate nature of matter: An example of a sociochemical norm in a university-level physical chemistry class, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2013, 14, 1, 81

    CrossRef

  46. 46
    Jingyan Lu, Zhidong Zhang, Scaffolding argumentation in intact class: Integrating technology and pedagogy, Computers & Education, 2013, 69, 189

    CrossRef

  47. 47
    Alina Reznitskaya, Maughn Gregory, Student Thought and Classroom Language: Examining the Mechanisms of Change in Dialogic Teaching, Educational Psychologist, 2013, 48, 2, 114

    CrossRef

  48. 48
    KATHERINE L. McNEILL, AMANDA M. KNIGHT, Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Scientific Argumentation: The Impact of Professional Development on K–12 Teachers, Science Education, 2013, 97, 6
  49. 49
    Jonathan Osborne, The 21st century challenge for science education: Assessing scientific reasoning, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2013, 10, 265

    CrossRef

  50. You have free access to this content50
    MERCE GARCIA-MILA, SANDRA GILABERT, SIBEL ERDURAN, MARK FELTON, The Effect of Argumentative Task Goal on the Quality of Argumentative Discourse, Science Education, 2013, 97, 4
  51. 51
    Sandra Gilabert, Merce Garcia-Mila, Mark K. Felton, The Effect of Task Instructions on Students’ Use of Repetition in Argumentative Discourse, International Journal of Science Education, 2013, 35, 17, 2857

    CrossRef

  52. 52
    Ruey-Yun Horng, Po-Hui Lu, Pei-Hua Chen, Shih-Huan Hou, The Effects of Argument Stance on Scientific Knowledge Inquiry Skills, International Journal of Science Education, 2013, 35, 16, 2784

    CrossRef

  53. 53
    YING-CHIH CHEN, BRIAN HAND, LEAH McDOWELL, The Effects of Writing-to-Learn Activities on Elementary Students’ Conceptual Understanding: Learning About Force and Motion Through Writing to Older Peers, Science Education, 2013, 97, 5
  54. 54
    Anna T. Cianciolo, Kevin W. Eva, Jerry A. Colliver, Theory Development and Application in Medical Education, Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 2013, 25, sup1, S75

    CrossRef

  55. 55
    Mehmet Aydeniz, Aybuke Pabuccu, Pinar Seda Cetin, Ebru Kaya, ARGUMENTATION AND STUDENTS’ CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING OF PROPERTIES AND BEHAVIORS OF GASES, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2012, 10, 6, 1303

    CrossRef

  56. 56
    Bradford H. Pillow, RaeAnne M. Pearson, Children's evaluation of the certainty of another person's inductive inferences and guesses, Cognitive Development, 2012, 27, 3, 299

    CrossRef

  57. 57
    Leema K. Berland, Katherine L. McNeill, For whom is argument and explanation a necessary distinction? A response to Osborne and Patterson, Science Education, 2012, 96, 5
  58. You have free access to this content58
    Leema K. Berland, David Hammer, Framing for scientific argumentation, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2012, 49, 1
  59. 59
    Venka Simovska, Leena Paakkari, Olli Paakkari, Health literacy as a learning outcome in schools, Health Education, 2012, 112, 2, 133

    CrossRef

  60. 60
    Leema K. Berland, Victor R. Lee, In Pursuit of Consensus: Disagreement and legitimization during small-group argumentation, International Journal of Science Education, 2012, 34, 12, 1857

    CrossRef

  61. 61
    Karen Mutch-Jones, Gillian Puttick, Daphne Minner, Lesson study for accessible science: Building expertise to improve practice in inclusive science classrooms, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2012, 49, 8
  62. 62
    Rola Khishfe, Relationship between nature of science understandings and argumentation skills: A role for counterargument and contextual factors, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2012, 49, 4
  63. 63
    Hongshia Zhang, Huachun He, Student Perceptions of the Integrated ‘Science Education’ Major in Some Chinese Universities, International Journal of Science Education, 2012, 34, 13, 1991

    CrossRef

  64. 64
    Medha Tare, Jason French, Brandy N. Frazier, Judy Diamond, E. Margaret Evans, Explanatory parent–child conversation predominates at an evolution exhibit, Science Education, 2011, 95, 4
  65. 65
    Chin-Chung Tsai, Hsin Ning Jessie Ho, Jyh-Chong Liang, Hung-Ming Lin, Scientific epistemic beliefs, conceptions of learning science and self-efficacy of learning science among high school students, Learning and Instruction, 2011,

    CrossRef

  66. 66
    Maureen A. O'Malley, Sabina Leonelli, The scientific importance of asking questions at meetings: Why virtual debate is not enough, BioEssays, 2011, 33, 1
  67. 67
    Ilonca Hardy, Birgit Kloetzer, Kornelia Moeller, Beate Sodian, The Analysis of Classroom Discourse: Elementary School Science Curricula Advancing Reasoning With Evidence, Educational Assessment, 2010, 15, 3-4, 197

    CrossRef

  68. 68
    Deanna Kuhn, Yanan Wang, Huamei Li, Why Argue? Developing Understanding of the Purposes and Values of Argumentive Discourse, Discourse Processes, 2010, 48, 1, 26

    CrossRef

  69. 69
    Robert B. Ricco, The Development of Reasoning, Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science,