SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Hee-Sun Lee, Ou Lydia Liu, Amy Pallant, Katrina Crotts Roohr, Sarah Pryputniewicz, Zoë E. Buck, Assessment of uncertainty-infused scientific argumentation, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2014, 51, 5
  2. 2
    Gina N. Cervetti, Anne L. DiPardo, Sara J. Staley, Entering the Conversation, The Elementary School Journal, 2014, 000

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    ROSEMARY S. RUSS, Epistemology of Science vs. Epistemology for Science, Science Education, 2014, 98, 3
  4. 4
    Rola Khishfe, Explicit Nature of Science and Argumentation Instruction in the Context of Socioscientific Issues: An effect on student learning and transfer, International Journal of Science Education, 2014, 36, 6, 974

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Ellice A. Forman, Randi A. Engle, Patrice Venturini, Michael J. Ford, Introduction to special issue: International examinations and extensions of the productive disciplinary engagement framework, International Journal of Educational Research, 2014, 64, 149

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Audrey Msimanga, Anthony Lelliott, Talking Science in Multilingual Contexts in South Africa: Possibilities and challenges for engagement in learners home languages in high school classrooms, International Journal of Science Education, 2014, 36, 7, 1159

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Melissa Schen, A comparison of biology majors’ written arguments across the curriculum, Journal of Biological Education, 2013, 47, 4, 224

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Nicolai Basel, Ute Harms, Helmut Prechtl, Analysis of students’ arguments on evolutionary theory, Journal of Biological Education, 2013, 47, 4, 192

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Mehmet C. Ayar, Mehmet Aydeniz, Bugrahan Yalvac, ANALYZING SCIENCE ACTIVITIES IN FORCE AND MOTION CONCEPTS: A DESIGN OF AN IMMERSION UNIT, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2013,

    CrossRef

  10. You have free access to this content10
    PER MORTEN KIND, Conceptualizing the Science Curriculum: 40 Years of Developing Assessment Frameworks in Three Large-Scale Assessments, Science Education, 2013, 97, 5
  11. 11
    Hui Jin, Li Zhan, Charles W Anderson, Developing a Fine-Grained Learning Progression Framework for Carbon-Transforming Processes, International Journal of Science Education, 2013, 35, 10, 1663

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Deanna Kuhn, Nicole Zillmer, Amanda Crowell, Julia Zavala, Developing Norms of Argumentation: Metacognitive, Epistemological, and Social Dimensions of Developing Argumentive Competence, Cognition and Instruction, 2013, 31, 4, 456

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Jan Alexis Nielsen, Dialectical Features of Students’ Argumentation: A Critical Review of Argumentation Studies in Science Education, Research in Science Education, 2013, 43, 1, 371

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Per Morten Kind, Establishing Assessment Scales Using a Novel Disciplinary Rationale for Scientific Reasoning, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 5
  15. 15
    Maria Evagorou, Jonathan Osborne, Exploring young students' collaborative argumentation within a socioscientific issue, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 2
  16. 16
    Nicole A. Shea, Ravit Golan Duncan, From Theory to Data: The Process of Refining Learning Progressions, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2013, 22, 1, 7

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Joi Phelps Walker, Victor Sampson, Learning to Argue and Arguing to Learn: Argument-Driven Inquiry as a Way to Help Undergraduate Chemistry Students Learn How to Construct Arguments and Engage in Argumentation During a Laboratory Course, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 5
  18. You have free access to this content18
    MERCE GARCIA-MILA, SANDRA GILABERT, SIBEL ERDURAN, MARK FELTON, The Effect of Argumentative Task Goal on the Quality of Argumentative Discourse, Science Education, 2013, 97, 4
  19. 19
    Knut Neumann, Tobias Viering, William J. Boone, Hans E. Fischer, Towards a learning progression of energy, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 2
  20. 20
    Amelia Wenk Gotwals, Nancy Butler Songer, Validity Evidence for Learning Progression-Based Assessment Items That Fuse Core Disciplinary Ideas and Science Practices, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 5
  21. 21
    Sami Lehesvuori, Jouni Viiri, Helena Rasku-Puttonen, Josephine Moate, Jussi Helaakoski, Visualizing communication structures in science classrooms: Tracing cumulativity in teacher-led whole class discussions, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 8
  22. 22
    Hui Jin, Charles W. Anderson, A learning progression for energy in socio-ecological systems, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2012, 49, 9
  23. 23
    Kent J. Crippen, Argument as Professional Development: Impacting Teacher Knowledge and Beliefs About Science, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2012, 23, 8, 847

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    John E. Opfer, Ross H. Nehm, Minsu Ha, Cognitive foundations for science assessment design: Knowing what students know about evolution, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2012, 49, 6
  25. 25
    Leema K. Berland, Katherine L. McNeill, For whom is argument and explanation a necessary distinction? A response to Osborne and Patterson, Science Education, 2012, 96, 5
  26. 26
    Karen Mutch-Jones, Gillian Puttick, Daphne Minner, Lesson study for accessible science: Building expertise to improve practice in inclusive science classrooms, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2012, 49, 8
  27. 27
    Erin Marie Furtak, Linking a learning progression for natural selection to teachers' enactment of formative assessment, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2012, 49, 9
  28. 28
    Rola Khishfe, Relationship between nature of science understandings and argumentation skills: A role for counterargument and contextual factors, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2012, 49, 4
  29. 29
    Victor Sampson, Margaret R. Blanchard, Science teachers and scientific argumentation: Trends in views and practice, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2012, 49, 9
  30. 30
    April C. Maskiewicz, Victoria A. Winters, Understanding the co-construction of inquiry practices: A case study of a responsive teaching environment, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2012, 49, 4
  31. 31
    Katherine L. McNeill, Elementary students' views of explanation, argumentation, and evidence, and their abilities to construct arguments over the school year, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2011, 48, 7
  32. 32
    Richard Duschl, Seungho Maeng, Asli Sezen, Learning progressions and teaching sequences: a review and analysis, Studies in Science Education, 2011, 47, 2, 123

    CrossRef