SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Aikenhead, G. (1994). What is STS science teaching? In J. Solomon & G. Aikenhead (Eds.), STS education: International perspectives on reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Aikenhead, G. S., & Jegede, O. J. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(3), 269287.
  • Ashcraft, C. (2006). “Girl, you better go get you a condom”: Popular culture and teen sexuality as resources for critical multicultural curriculum. Teachers College Record, 108(10), 21452186.
    Direct Link:
  • Basu, S. J., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2007). Developing a sustained interest in science among urban minority youth. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 466489.
  • Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Patrick, H., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1997). Teaching for understanding. In B. J. Biddle, T. L. Good, & I. F. Goodson (Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 819878). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Blumenreich, M., & Siegel, M. (2006). Innocent victims, fighter cells, and white uncles: A discourse analysis of children's books about AIDS. Children's Literature in Education, 37(1), 81110.
  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (5th ed.). New York: Pearson Education.
  • Brotman, J. S. (2009). Urban high school students' talk about HIV/AIDS decision-making: Learning, identities, and the influence of school. Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University, New York. Retrieved December 18, 2009, from http://eduproxy.tc-library.org/?url=http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=1873773971&sid=4&Fmt=2&clientId=65913&RQT=309&VName=PQD (Publication No. AAT 3373708).
  • Brotman, J. S., Mensah, F. M., & Lesko, N. (2010). Exploring identities to deepen understanding of urban high school students' sexual health decision-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. DOI:10.1002/tea.20370.
  • Buckingham, D., & Bragg, S. (2004). Young people, sex and the media: The facts of life? Houndmills & New York: Palgrave.
  • Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 5073.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2001). Updated U.S. public health service guidelines for the management of occupational exposures to HBV, HCV, and HIV and recommendations for postexposure prophylaxis. Retrieved December 22, 2008, from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5011a1.htm.
  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
  • Costa, V. B. (1995). When science is “another word”: Relationships between worlds of family, friends, school, and science. Science Education, 79(3), 313333.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Davies, B. (1989). The discursive production of the male/female dualism in school settings. Oxford Review of Education, 15(3), 229241.
  • Davies, B. (1994). Poststructuralist theory and classroom practice. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University.
  • Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). Learning in science—from behaviourism towards social constructivism and beyond. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 325). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Fine, M. (1988). Sexuality, schooling, and adolescent females: The missing discourse of desire. Harvard Educational Review, 58(1), 2952.
  • Fine, M., & McClelland, S. I. (2006). Sexuality education and desire: Still missing after all these years. Harvard Educational Review, 76(3), 297338.
  • Fowler, S. R., Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2009). Moral sensitivity in the context of socioscientific issues in high school science students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(2), 279296.
  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
  • Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Judging the quality of fourth generation evaluation, Fourth generation evaluation (pp. 228251). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Hong, J.-L., & Chang, N.-K. (2004). Analysis of Korean high school students' decision-making processes in solving a problem involving biological knowledge. Research in Science Education, 34, 97111.
  • Keselman, A., Kaufman, D. R., Kramer, S., & Patel, V. L. (2007). Fostering conceptual change and critical reasoning about HIV and AIDS. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 844863.
  • Kolstø, S. D. (2000). Consensus projects: Teaching science for citizenship. International Journal of Science Education, 22(6), 645664.
  • Kolstø, S. D. (2006). Patterns in students' argumentation confronted with a risk-focused socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 28(14), 16891716.
  • Laub, C., Somera, D., Gowen, L. K., & Diaz, R. M. (1999). Targeting “risky” gender ideologies: Constructing a community-driven, theory-based HIV prevention intervention for youth. Health Education and Behavior, 26(2), 185199.
  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lesko, N. (2001). Act your age! A cultural construction of adolescence. New York: Routledge Falmer.
  • Levinson, R. (2006). Towards a theoretical framework for teaching controversial socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 28(10), 12011224.
  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Luker, K. (2006). When sex goes to school: Warring views on sex—and sex education—since the sixties. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
  • Lupton, D. (1995). The imperative of health: Public health and the regulated body. London: Sage.
  • Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Moje, E., Ciechanowski, K., Kramer, K., Ellis, L., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and Discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(1), 3870.
  • Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132141.
  • Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Muhr, T. (2005). Atlas.ti (Version 5.2 for Windows). Berlin: Atlas.ti Scientific Software Development GmBh. (Original work published 1997)
  • NYC Department of Education. (2005). The updated HIV/AIDS curriculum. Retrieved January 11, 2009, from http://schools.nyc.gov/Academics/FitnessandHealth/StandardsCurriculum/HIVAIDScurriculum
  • Persson, A., & Newman, C. (2008). Making monsters: Heterosexuality, crime and race in recent Western media coverage of HIV. Sociology of Health & Illness, 30(4), 632646.
  • Reeve, S., & Bell, P. (2007, April 17). “It has a little bit of fattening in it”: Documenting children's conceptions of “healthy” and “unhealthy.” Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA.
  • Reeve, S., & Bell, P. (2008, March 31). How everyday ideas influence children's understandings of health. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Conference, Baltimore, MD.
  • Reeve, S., & Bell, P. (2009). Children's self-documentation and understanding of the concepts “healthy” and “unhealthy.” International Journal of Science Education, 31(14), 19531974.
  • Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513536.
  • Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37, 371391.
  • Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112.
  • Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Introduction: The new science of learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 116). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Seiler, G. (2001). Reversing the “standard” direction: Science emerging from the lives of African American students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(9), 10001014.
  • Simonneaux, L. (2001). Role-play or debate to promote students' argumentation and justification on an issue in animal transgenesis. International Journal of Science Education, 23(9), 903927.
  • Smith, D. K., Grohskopf, L. A., Black, R. J., Auerbach, J. D., Veronese, F., Struble, K. A., et al. (2005). Antiretroviral postexposure prophylaxis after sexual, injection-drug use, or other nonoccupational exposure to HIV in the United States: Recommendations from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved December 22, 2008, from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5402a1.htm.
  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Tolman, D. L. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Treichler, P. A. (1999). How to have theory in an epidemic: Cultural chronicles of AIDS. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Walker, K. A., & Zeidler, D. L. (2007). Promoting discourse about socioscientific issues through scaffolded inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 13871410.
  • Ward, J. V., & Taylor, J. M. (1992). Sexuality education for immigrant and minority students: Developing a culturally appropriate curriculum. In J. T. Sears (Ed.), Sexuality and the curriculum: The politics and practices of sexuality education (pp. 183202). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issue education. Science Education, 89(3), 357377.