SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCE

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2001). Atlas of science literacy. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Azevedo, F. S. (2005). Serious play: A comparative study of engagement and learning in hobby practice. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley.
  • Barton, A. C. (1998). Teaching science with homeless children: Pedagogy, representation, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(4), 379394.
  • Barton, A. C. (2001). Science education in urban settings: Seeking new ways of praxis through critical ethnography. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 899917.
  • Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2008). Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 68103.
  • Basu, S. J., & Barton, A. C. (2007). Developing a sustained interest in science among urban minority youth. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 466489.
  • Bell, P., Bricker, L. A., Lee, T. R., Reeve, S., & Zimmerman, H. T. (2006). Understanding the cultural foundations of children's biological knowledge: Insights from everyday cognition research. In S. A. Barab, K. E. Hay, & D. Hickey (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 10291035). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87, 352377.
  • Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hogarth, S. (2007). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91, 347370.
  • Bricker, L., & Bell, P. (2007). “Um… since I argue for fun, I don't remember what I argue about.”: Using children's argumentation across social contexts to inform science instruction. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
  • Bronowski, J. (1965). Science and human values. New York: Harper Brothers.
  • Brown, P., Zavestoski, S., McCormick, S., Mayer, B., Morello-Frosch, R., & Altman, R. G. (2004). Embodied health movements: New approaches to social movements in health. Sociology of Health and Illness, 26, 5080.
  • Carpini, M. X. D., Cook, F. L., & Jacobs, L. R. (2004). Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 315344.
  • Chapman, B. (1993). The overselling of science education in the 1980s. In R. Levinson (Ed.), Teaching science (pp. 192207). New York: Routledge.
  • Collins, H., Evans, R., & Gorman, M. (2007). Trading zones and interactional expertise. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 38, 657666.
  • Committee for the Reorganization of Secondary Education. (1920). Reorganization of science in secondary schools. Washington, DC: National Education Association of the United States.
  • Committee of Ten. (1894). Report of the Committee of Ten on secondary school studies. Washington, DC: National Education Association of the United States.
  • Crowley, K., & Jacobs, M. (2002). Islands of expertise and the development of family scientific literacy. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 333356). Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship with science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582601.
  • Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. New York: Henry Holt & Co.
  • Donnelly, J. (2006). The intellectual positioning of science in the curriculum, and its relationship to reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(6), 623640.
  • Drori, G. S. (2000). Science education and economic development: Trends, relationships and research agenda. Studies in Science Education, 35(1), 2757.
  • Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38(1), 3972.
  • Epstein, S. (1996). Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Ford, M. J. (2008). “Grasp of practice” as a reasoning resource for inquiry and nature of science understanding. Science & Education, 17(2&3), 147177.
  • Fujimura, J. H. (1996). Crafting science: A sociohistory of the quest for the genetics of cancer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Gonzales, N., & Moll, L. (2002). Cruzando el puente: Building bridges to funds of knowledge. Educational Policy, 16, 623641.
  • Hackett, E. J., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M., & Wajcman, J. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of science and technology studies (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Hand, B. M., Alvermann, D. E., Gee, J. P., Guzzetti, B. J., Norris, S. P., Phillips, L. M., Prain, V., & Yore, L. D. (2003). Message from the “Island Group”: What is literacy in science literacy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 607615.
  • Hand, B. M., Yore, L. D., Jagger, S., & Prain, V. (2010). Connecting research in science literacy and classroom practice: A review of science teaching journals in Australia, the UK and the United States, 1998–2008. Studies in Science Education, 46(1), 4568.
  • Hazen, R. M., & Trefil, J. (1991). Science matters: Achieving scientific literacy. New York: Doubleday.
  • Hodson, D. (2009). Toward scientific literacy: A teachers' guide to the history, philosophy and sociology of science. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: SensePublishers.
  • Hornig, S. (1993). Reading risk: public response to print media accounts of technological risk. Public Understanding of Science, 2, 95109.
  • Hurd, P. D. (1958). Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools. Educational Leadership, 16(13–16), 52.
  • Irwin, A., & Michael, M. (2003). Science, social theory and public knowledge. Maidenhead, PA: Open University Press.
  • Irwin, A., & Wynne, B. (1996). Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kleinman, D. L. (Ed.). (2000). Science, technology and democracy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lambert, H., & Rose, H. (1996). Disembodied knowledge? Making sense of medical science. In A. Irwin & B. Wynne (Eds.), Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology (pp. 6582). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84, 7194.
  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Layton, D., Jenkins, E., & Donnelly, J. (1994). Scientific and technological literacy: Meanings and rationales; an annotated bibliography. Leeds, England: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education.
  • Layton, D., Jenkins, E., Macgill, S., & Davey, A. (1993). Inarticulate science? Perspectives on the public understanding of science and some implications for science education. Leeds, England: University of Leeds.
  • Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831880). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2009). Images of learning, images of progress. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 731735.
  • Lowell, B. L., & Salzman, H. (2007). Into the eye of the storm: Assessing the evidence on science and engineering education, quality, and workforce demand. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
  • Lowell, B. L., Salzman, H., Bernstein, H., & Henderson, E. (2009). Steady as she goes? Three generations of students through the science and engineering pipeline. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management. Washington, DC.
  • Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397422.
  • Miller, J. D. (1983). Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus, 112(2), 2948.
  • Miller, J. D. (2004). Public understanding of, and attitudes toward, scientific research: What we know and what we need to know. Public Understanding of Science, 13, 273294.
  • Miller, S. (2001). Public understanding of science at the crossroads. Public Understanding of Science, 10(1), 115120.
  • Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 37, 224240.
  • Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. London: Nuffield Foundation.
  • Pedretti, E. (1997). Septic tank crisis: A case study of science, technology and society education in an elementary school. International Journal of Science Education, 19(10), 12111230.
  • Pitrelli, N. (2003). The crisis of “public understanding of science” in Great Britain. JCOM, 2(1).
  • Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific concept: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211227.
  • Pugh, K. J., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Koskey, K. L. K., Stewart, V. C., & Manzey, C. (2010). Motivation, learning, and transformative experience: A study of deep engagement in science. Science Education, 94, 128.
  • Rahm, J., Moore, J. C., & Martel-Reny, M.-P. (2005). The role of afterschool and community science programs in the lives of urban youth. School Science and Mathematics, 105(6), 283291.
  • Roberts, D. A. (1983). Scientific literacy: Towards a balance for setting goals for school science programs. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Minister of Supply and Services.
  • Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (pp. 729779). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Roth, W.-M., & Lee, S. (2002). Scientific literacy as collective praxis. Public Understanding of Science, 11(1), 3356.
  • Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education, 36, 144.
  • Ryder, N. (1993). Vernacular science: Something to rely on in your actions? In P. J. Black & A. M. Lucas (Eds.), Children's informal ideas about science (pp. 148171). New York: Routledge.
  • Schwartz, D. L., Bransford, J. D., & Sears, D. (2005). Efficiency and innovation in transfer. In J. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 152). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  • Shen, B. S. P. (1975). Science literacy and the public understanding of science. In S. B. Day (Ed.), Communication of scientific information (pp. 4452). New York: S. Karger and A. G. Basel.
  • Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387420.
  • Sutman, F. X., & Bruce, M. H. (1992). Chemistry in the community—ChemCom: A five-year evaluation. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(7), 564567.
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 11241131.
  • Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535585.
  • Wynne, B. (1992). Misunderstood misunderstandings: Social identities and public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science, 1(3), 281304.
  • Wynne, B. (2007). Dazzled by the mirage of influence? Science, Technology & Human Values, 32(4), 491503.
  • Wynne, B. (2010). Rationality and Ritual: Participation and exclusion in nuclear decision-making. London: Earthscan.
  • Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Applebaum, S., & Callahan, B. E. (2009). Advancing reflective judgment through socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 74101.