SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Eva Erdosne Toth, Analyzing “real-world” anomalous data after experimentation with a virtual laboratory, Educational Technology Research and Development, 2016, 64, 1, 157

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Murat Akçayır, Gökçe Akçayır, Hüseyin Miraç Pektaş, Mehmet Akif Ocak, Augmented reality in science laboratories: The effects of augmented reality on university students’ laboratory skills and attitudes toward science laboratories, Computers in Human Behavior, 2016, 57, 334

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Jie Chao, Jennifer L. Chiu, Crystal J. DeJaegher, Edward A. Pan, Sensor-Augmented Virtual Labs: Using Physical Interactions with Science Simulations to Promote Understanding of Gas Behavior, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2016, 25, 1, 16

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Niwat Srisawasdi, Improving K-12 STEM Education Outcomes through Technological Integration, 2016,

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Paul W. Irving, Eleanor C. Sayre, Becoming a physicist: The roles of research, mindsets, and milestones in upper-division student perceptions, Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 2015, 11, 2

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Raghu Raman, Smrithi Venkatasubramanian, Krishnashree Achuthan, Prema Nedungadi, Computer Science (CS) Education in Indian Schools, ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 2015, 15, 2, 1

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Zacharias C. Zacharia, Examining whether touch sensory feedback is necessary for science learning through experimentation: A literature review of two different lines of research across K-16, Educational Research Review, 2015, 16, 116

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Niwat Srisawasdi, Patcharin Panjaburee, Exploring effectiveness of simulation-based inquiry learning in science with integration of formative assessment, Journal of Computers in Education, 2015, 2, 3, 323

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Kuei-Pin Chien, Cheng-Yue Tsai, Hsiu-Ling Chen, Wen-Hua Chang, Sufen Chen, Learning differences and eye fixation patterns in virtual and physical science laboratories, Computers & Education, 2015, 82, 191

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    James R. Brinson, Learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional (hands-on) laboratories: A review of the empirical research, Computers & Education, 2015, 87, 218

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    Jennifer L. Chiu, Crystal J. DeJaegher, Jie Chao, The effects of augmented virtual science laboratories on middle school students' understanding of gas properties, Computers & Education, 2015, 85, 59

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Constanze Hampp, Stephan Schwan, The Role of Authentic Objects in Museums of the History of Science and Technology: Findings from a visitor study, International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 2015, 5, 2, 161

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    SUFEN CHEN, WEN-HUA CHANG, CHIH-HUNG LAI, CHENG-YUE TSAI, A Comparison of Students’ Approaches to Inquiry, Conceptual Learning, and Attitudes in Simulation-Based and Microcomputer-Based Laboratories, Science Education, 2014, 98, 5
  14. 14
    Wim T. J. L. Pouw, Tamara van Gog, Fred Paas, An Embedded and Embodied Cognition Review of Instructional Manipulatives, Educational Psychology Review, 2014, 26, 1, 51

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Nathan D. Orloff, Cynthia Truong, Nathan Cira, Stephen Koo, Andrea Hamilton, Sean Choi, Victoria Wu, Ingmar H. Riedel-Kruse, Integrated bioprinting and imaging for scalable, networkable desktop experimentation, RSC Advances, 2014, 4, 65, 34721

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Junjun Chen, Bronwen Cowie, SCIENTISTS TALKING TO STUDENTS THROUGH VIDEOS, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2014, 12, 2, 445

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Niwat Srisawasdi, Siriporn Kroothkeaw, Supporting students’ conceptual development of light refraction by simulation-based open inquiry with dual-situated learning model, Journal of Computers in Education, 2014, 1, 1, 49

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Ari Widodo, Riandi, Dual-mode teacher professional development: challenges and re-visioning future TPD in Indonesia, Teacher Development, 2013, 17, 3, 380

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    Georgios Olympiou, Zacharia Zacharias, Ton deJong, Making the invisible visible: enhancing students’ conceptual understanding by introducing representations of abstract objects in a simulation, Instructional Science, 2013, 41, 3, 575

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    T. de Jong, M. C. Linn, Z. C. Zacharia, Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education, Science, 2013, 340, 6130, 305

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    Allison S. Liu, Christian D. Schunn, Jesse Flot, Robin Shoop, The role of physicality in rich programming environments, Computer Science Education, 2013, 23, 4, 315

    CrossRef

  22. 22
    Audcharaporn Gunhaart, Niwat Srisawasdi, Effect of Integrated Compute-based Laboratory Environment On Students’ Physics Conceptual Learning of Sound Wave Properties, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, 46, 5750

    CrossRef

  23. 23
    Duncan Quarless, Fernando Nieto, Exploring Hybrid Instruction in Science: Using LMS for Contextual, Interdisciplinary Active Learning Enrichment, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 2012, 41, 3, 279

    CrossRef