SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Abell, S. K., Bryan, L. A., & Anderson, M. A. (1998). Investigating preservice elementary science teacher reflective thinking using integrated media case-based instruction in elementary science teacher preparation. Science Education, 82, 491509.
  • Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81, 132169.
  • Alsup, J. (2006). Teacher identity discourses: Negotiating personal and professional spaces. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Anagnostopoulos, D., Smith, E. R., & Basmadjian, K. G. (2007). Bridging the university-school divide: Horizontal expertise and the “two-worlds pitfall.” Journal of Teacher Education, 58, 138152.
  • Anderson, R. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 112.
  • Becker, H. S., Geer, B., & Hughes, E. (1968). Making the grade: The academic side of college life. New York: Wiley.
  • Bianchini, J. A., & Cavazos, L. M. (2007). Learning from students, inquiry into practice, and participation in professional communities: Beginning teachers’ uneven progress toward equitable science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 586612.
  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklin, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. New York: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Book, C. L., & Freeman, D. J. (1986). Differences in entry characteristics of elementary and secondary teacher candidates. Journal of Teacher Education, 37, 47-51.
  • Borko, H., & Shavelson, R. J. (1990). Teacher decision making. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 331346). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Bradbury, L. U., & Koballa, T. R. J. (2008). Borders to cross: Identifying sources of tension in mentor-intern relationships. Teacher & Teacher Education, 24, 21322145.
  • Brookhart, S. M., & Freeman, D. J. (1992). Characteristics of entering teacher candidates. Review of Educational Research, 62, 3760.
  • Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., et al. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS.
  • Clift, R. T., & Brady, P. (2005). Research on methods courses and field experiences. In M. Chochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 309424). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Cobb, P., Gresalfi, M., & Hodge, L. L. (2009). An interpretive scheme for analyzing the identities that students develop in mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40, 4068.
  • Cobb, P., & Hodge, L. L. (2002). A relational perspective on issues of cultural diversity and equity as they play out in the mathematics classroom. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4, 249284.
  • Cobb, P., & Hodge, L. L. (2003). Culture, identity and equity in the mathematics classroom. In N. I. S. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 159172). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (2002). A constructivist approach to second grade mathematics. In E. Glasersfeld (Ed.), Radical constructivism in mathematics education (Vol. 7, pp. 157176). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95S120.
  • Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Crawford, B. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 613642.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124130.
  • Davis, E. A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76, 607651.
  • Davis, E. A., & Smithey, J. (2009). Beginning teachers moving toward effective elementary science teaching. Science Education, 93, 745770.
  • Doyle, W. (1983). Academic work. Review of Educational Research, 53, 159199.
  • Eick, C. J., & Reed, C. J. (2002). What makes an inquiry-oriented science teacher? The influence of learning histories on student teacher role identity and practice. Science Education, 86, 401416.
  • Enydey, N., Goldberg, J., & Welsh, K. (2006). Complex dilemmas of identity and practice. International Journal of Science Education, 90, 6893.
  • Esterberg, K. G. (2002). Qualitative methods in social research. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
  • Feiman-Nemser, S., & Buchmann, M. (1985). Pitfalls of experience in teacher preparation. Teachers College Record, 87, 5365.
  • Forbes, C. T. (2011). Preservice elementary teachers’ adaptation of science curriculum materials for inquiry-based elementary science. Science Education, 95, 129.
  • Forbes, C. T., & Davis, E. A. (2010). Beginning elementary teachers’ beliefs about the use of anchoring questions in science: A longitudinal study. Science Education, 94, 365387.
  • Friedrichsen, P., Driel, J. H. V., & Abell, S. K. (2010). Taking a closer look at science teaching orientations. Science Education, 95(2), 358376.
  • Fryberg, S., & Markus, H. (2007). Cultural models of education in American Indian, Asian American and European American contexts. Social Psychology of Education, 10, 213246.
  • Gee, J. P. (1989). Literacy, discourse, and linguistics: Introduction. Journal of Education, 171, 517.
  • Gee, J. P. (1991). What is literacy? In C. Mitchell & K. Weiler (Eds.), Rewriting literacy: Culture and the discourse of the other (pp. 3-11). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
  • Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies : Ideology in discourses. Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
  • Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Routledge.
  • Gomez, M., Allen, A. R., & Black, R. (2007). “Becoming” a teacher. The Teachers College Record, 109, 21072135.
  • Gunckel, K. L. (2011). Mediators of a preservice teacher's use of the inquiry-application instructional model. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22, 79100.
  • Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Caine, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Horn, I. S., Nolen, S. B., Ward, C., & Campbell, S. S. (2008). Developing practices in multiple worlds: The role of identity in learning to teach. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35, 6172.
  • Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006). Cultivating model-based reasoning in science education. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 371388). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Luehmann, A. L. (2007). Identity development as a lens to science teacher preparations. Science Education, 91, 822839.
  • Magnusson, S. J., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
  • McCarthey, S., & Moje, E. B. (2002). Identity matters. Reading Research Quarterly, 37, 228238.
  • McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2008). Scientific explanations: Characterizing and evaluating the effects of teachers’ instructional practices on student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 5378.
  • Meade, P., & McMeniman, M. (1992). Stimulated recall—an effective methodology for examining successful teaching in science. The Australian Educational Researcher, 19(3), 118.
  • Mikeska, J. N., Anderson, C. W., & Schwarz, C. V. (2009). Principled reasoning about problems of practice. Science Education, 93, 678686.
  • Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Moje, E. B., Ciechanowski, K. M., Kramer, K., Ellis, L., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(1), 3870.
  • Mulholland, J., & Wallace, J. (2000). Beginning primary science teaching: Entryways to different worlds. Research in Science Education, 30, 155171.
  • National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Committee on Science Learning Kindergarten Through Eighth Grade, R. A. Duschl, H. A. Schweingruber, & A. W. Shouse (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Pinnegar, S., Mangelson, J., Reed, M., & Groves, S. (2011). Exploring preservice teachers’ metaphor plotlines. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 639647.
  • Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211227.
  • Rice, D. C. (2005). I didn't know oxygen could boil! What preservice and inservice elementary teachers’ answers to “simple” science questions reveals about their subject matter knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 10591082.
  • Richmond, G., Juzwik, M. M., & Steele, M. D. (2011). Trajectories of teacher identity development across institutional contexts: Constructing a narrative approach. Teachers College Record, 113, 18631905.
  • Romberg, T. A., Carpenter, T. P., & Dremock, F. (2005). Understanding mathematics and science matters. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Schwarz, C. V. (2009). Developing preservice elementary teachers’ knowledge and practices through modeling-centered scientific inquiry. Science Education, 93, 720744.
  • Schwarz, C. V., Gunckel, K. L., Smith, E. L., Covitt, B. A., Bae, M., Enfield, M., et al. (2008). Helping elementary preservice teachers learn to use curriculum materials for effective science teaching. Science Education, 92, 345377.
  • Schwarz, C. V., & Gwekwerere, Y. N. (2007). Using a guided inquiry and modeling instructional framework (EIMA) to support pre-service K-8 science teaching. Science Education, 91, 158186.
  • Simon, M. A. (2000). Research on the development of mathematics teachers: The teacher development experiment. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 335359). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Simon, M. A., & Tzur, R. (1999). Explicating the teacher's perspective from the researchers’ perspectives: Generating accounts of mathematics teachers’ practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 252264.
  • Smith, E. L. (1990). A conceptual change model of learning science. In S. M. Glynn, R. H. Yeany, & B. K. Britton (Eds.), The psychology of learning science (pp. 4363). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Smith, E. L. (2001). Strategic approaches to achieving science learning goals. Paper presented at the Conference on Improving Science Curriculum Materials Through Research-Based Evaluation, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Thompson, J., Windschitl, M., & Braaten, M. (2010). Developing a theory of teacher practice. Paper presented at the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Volkmann, M. J., & Anderson, M. A. (1998). Creating professional identity: Dilemmas and metaphors of a first-year chemistry teacher. Science Education, 82, 293310.
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Windschitl, M., & Thompson, J. (2006). Transcending simple forms of school science investigation: The impact of preservice instruction on teachers’ understandings of model-based inquiry. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 783835.
  • Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92, 941967.
  • Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2009). The beginner's repertoire: Proposing a core set of instructional practices for teacher preparation. Paper presented at the DR K-12 meeting, National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.
  • Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2011). Ambitious pedagogy by novice teachers: Who benefits from tool-supported collaborative inquiry into practice and why? Teachers College Record, 113, 13111360.
  • Zembal-Saul, C. (2009). Learning to teach elementary school science as argument. Science Education, 93, 687719.
  • Zembal-Saul, C., Krajcik, J., & Blumenfeld, P. (2002). Elementary student teachers’ science content representations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 443463.