SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Editorial comment in Lawson, A. E., et al., “Piagetian formal operational tasks; A crossover study of learning effect and reliability,” Sci. Educ., 58 (2): 267276 (1974).
  • 2
    Editorial comment in Mori I. and O. Vitogama, “The effect of religious ideas on a child's conception of time: A comparison of Japanese children and Thai children,” Sci. Educ., 58 (4): 519522 (1974).
  • 3
    Editorial comment in Raven, R. J. and R. Guerin, “Quasi-simplex analysis of Piaget's operative structures and stages,” Sci. Educ., 59 (2): 274 (1975).
  • 4
    Novak, J. D., “Editorial comment on ‘A review of Piagetian studies relevant to science instruction at the secondary and college level,’” Sci. Educ., 60 (2): 251 (1976).
  • 5
    Novak, J. D., “Editorial comment on A child's forming the concept of speed,'” Sci, Educ., 60 (4): 579 (1976).
  • 6
    Novak, J. D., “Editorial comments on Teaching about floating and sinking: Further studies toward closing the gap between cognitive psychology and classroom practice,'” Sci. Educ., 61 (4): 573574 (1977).
  • 7
    Novak, J. D., “Understanding the learning process and effectiveness of teaching methods in the classroom, laboratory, and field,” Sci. Educ., 60 (4): 493512 (1976).
  • 8
    Novak, J. D., “Epicycles and the homocentric earth: Or what is wrong with stages of cognitive development,” Sci. Educ., 61 (3): 393395 (1977).
  • 9
    Novak, J. D., “An alternative to Piagetian psychology for science and mathematics education,” Sci. Educ., 61 (4): 453477 (1977).
  • 10
    Novak, J. D., A Theory of Education, Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell U. P., 1977.
  • 11
    Piaget, J., “Development and learning”, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 2 (3): 176186 (1964).
  • 12
    Duckworth, E., “Piaget rediscovered,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., 2 (3): 172175 (1964).
  • 13
    Wollman, W. and A. Lawson, “Teaching the procedure of controlled experimentation: A Piagetian approach.” Sci. Educ., 61 (1): 5770 (1977).
  • 14
    Nussbaum, J. and Novak, J.An assessment of children's concepts of the earth utilizing structured interviews,” Sci. Educ., 60 (4): 535550 (1976).
  • 15
    Hibbard, M. K. and J. D. Novak, “Audiotutorial elementary school science instruction as a method for study of children's concept of learning: Particulate nature of matter,” Sci. Educ., 59 (4): 559570 (1975).
  • 16
    Ausubel, D., “The transition from concrete to abstract cognitive functioning: Theoretical issues and implications for education,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., 2 (3): 261266 (1964).
  • 17
    Novak, J. D., “Editorial comment on ‘The effect of visual devices based on Bruner's modes of representation on teaching concepts of electrostatics to elementary school children,’” Sci. Educ., 60 (1): 85 (1976).
  • 18
    McIntyre, P. J. and J. A. Reed, “The effect of visual devices based on Bruner's modes of representation on teaching concepts of electrostatics to elementary school children,” Sci. Educ., 60 (1): 8794 (1976).
  • 19
    Lawson, A. E. and R. Karplus, “Should theoretical concepts be taught before formal operations?,” Sci. Educ., 61 (1): 123125 (1977).