Research Article

You have free access to this content

Application of system dynamics to corporate strategy: an evolution of issues and frameworks

  1. Henry Birdseye Weil*

Article first published online: 30 OCT 2007

DOI: 10.1002/sdr.373

Issue

System Dynamics Review

System Dynamics Review

Special Issue: Exploring the Next Great Frontier: System Dynamics at 50 Guest Editor: John D. Sterman

Volume 23, Issue 2-3, pages 137–156, Summer - Autumn (Fall) 2007

Additional Information

How to Cite

Weil, H. B. (2007), Application of system dynamics to corporate strategy: an evolution of issues and frameworks. Syst. Dyn. Rev., 23: 137–156. doi: 10.1002/sdr.373

Author Information

*Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02142, U.S.A.

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 30 OCT 2007
  2. Article first published online: 30 OCT 2007
  3. Manuscript Accepted: JUN 2007
  4. Manuscript Received: JAN 2007

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

Get PDF (786K)

References

  • Abdel-Hamid T, Madnick SE. 1991. Software Project Dynamics: An Integrated Approach. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  • Abernathy WJ. 1978. The Productivity Dilemma: Roadblock to Innovation in the Automobile Industry. Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD.
  • Abernathy WJ, Clark KB. 1985. Innovation: mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy 14(1): 3–22.
  • Abernathy WJ, Utterback JM. 1978. Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review 80(7): 40–47.
  • Auh JH. 2003. Analysis of the impacts of internet-based business activities on the container shipping industry: the system dynamics modeling approach with the framework of technological evolution. PhD dissertation, Department of Ocean Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • Carr NG. 2003. IT doesn't matter. Harvard Business Review May: 41–49; and Letters to the Editor. Harvard Business Review July: 109–112.
  • Christensen CM. 1997. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technology Causes Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
  • Christensen CM, Overdorf M. 2000. Meeting the challenge of disruptive change. Harvard Business Review March–April: 66–76.
  • Christensen CM, Suarez FF, Utterback JM. 1998. Strategies for survival in fast-changing industries (Part 2 of 2). Management Science 44(12): S207–S220.
  • Cooper A, Schendel D. 1976. Strategic responses to technological threats. Business Horizons 19(1): 61–69.
  • Cooper KG. 1980. Naval ship production: a claim settled and a framework built. Interfaces 10(6): 20–36.
  • Dattée B. 2006. The social dynamics of technological substitutions and successful innovations. PhD dissertation, University College Dublin and Ecole Centrale Paris.
  • Dattée B, Weil HB. 2007. Dynamics of social factors in technological substitutions. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 74: 579–607.
  • de Gues AP. 1988. Planning as learning. Harvard Business Review 66: 70–74.
  • Forrester JW. 1961. Industrial Dynamics. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
  • Hamel G, Prahalad CK. 1989. Strategic intent. Harvard Business Review 67: 63–76.
  • Henderson RM, Clark KB. 1990. Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 9–30.
  • Klepper S, Graddy E. 1990. The evolution of new industries and the determinants of market structure. RAND Journal of Economics 21(1): 27–44.
  • Lyneis JM, Cooper KG, Els SE. 2001. Strategic management of complex projects: a case study using system dynamics. System Dynamics Review 17(3): 237–260.
    Direct Link:
  • Milling PM. 1996. Modeling innovation processes for decision support and management simulation. System Dynamics Review 12(3): 221–234.
    Direct Link:
  • Milling PM. 2001. Understanding and managing the innovation process (2001 Jay W. Forrester Award Lecture). System Dynamics Review 18(1): 73–86.
    Direct Link:
  • Morecroft J. 1985. Rationality in the analysis of behavioral simulation models. Management Science 31(7): 900–916.
  • Munir KA, Phillips N. 2002. The concept of industry and the case of radical technological change. Journal of High Technology Management Research 13: 279–297.
  • Ngai SSH. 2005. Multi-scale analysis and simulation of powder blending in pharmaceutical manufacturing. PhD dissertation, Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • Pine BJ II, Gilmore JH. 1998. Welcome to the experience economy. Harvard Business Review 76: 97–105.
  • Pistorius CWI, Utterback JM. 1997. Multi-mode Interaction among technologies. Research Policy 26: 67–84.
  • Porter ME. 1985. Competitive Advantage. Free Press: New York.
  • Porter ME. 1991. Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal 12(Winter): 95–117.
    Direct Link:
  • Repenning NP. 2001. Understanding fire fighting in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 18(5): 285–300.
  • Roberts EB. 1964. The Dynamics of Research and Development. Harper & Row: New York.
  • Roberts EB. 1967. The problem of aging organizations: a study of R&D units. Business Horizons (Winter): 51–58.
  • Roberts EB. (ed.). 1978. Managerial Applications of System Dynamics. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
  • Roberts EB, Abrams DI, Weil HB. 1968. A systems study of policy formulation in a vertically integrated firm. Management Science 14(12): B674–B694.
  • Simon H. 1957. Administrative Behavior: a Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations (2nd edn). Macmillan: New York.
  • Sterman JD. 2000. Business Dynamics: System Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Irwin McGraw-Hill: New York.
  • Sterman JD, Henderson R, Beinhocker ED, Newman LI. 2007. Getting big too fast: strategic dynamics with increasing returns and bounded rationality. Management Science 53(4): 683–696.
  • Stoughton M. 2000. Dynamics of technology adoption by basic industries: implications for cleaner production. PhD dissertation, Technology and Policy Program, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • Sull DN. 1999. Why good companies go bad. Harvard Business Review 77(4): 42–52.
  • Tushman ML, Anderson P. 1986. Technological discontinuities and organizational environment. Administrative Science Quarterly 31: 439–456.
  • Utterback JM. 1994. Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Harvard Business School Press: Cambridge, MA.
  • Utterback JM, Afuah AN. 1998. The dynamic “diamond”: a technological innovation perspective. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 6: 183–199.
  • Utterback JM, Kim L. 1986. Invasion of a stable business by radical innovation. In The Management of Productivity and Technology in Manufacturing, KleindorferP (ed.). Plenum Press: New York; 129–130.
  • Utterback JM, Suarez FF. 1993. Innovation, competition, and industry structure. Research Policy 22: 1–21.
  • Wack P 1985. Scenarios: uncharted waters ahead. Harvard Business Review 63(5): 73–89.
  • Weil HB. 1996. Commoditization of technology-based products and services: a generic model of market dynamics. Sloan School Working Paper #144-96, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • Weil HB, Bergan TA, Roberts EB. 1973. The dynamics of R&D strategy. In Proceedings of the 1973 Summer Computer Simulation Conference. Also in RobertsEB (ed.). 1978. Managerial Applications of System Dynamics. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
  • Weil HB, Dalton WJ. 1992. Risk management in complex projects. In System Dynamics 1992, VennixAM, FaberJ, ScheperWJ, TakkenbergCAT (eds). Utrecht University.
  • Weil HB, Stoughton M. 1998. Commoditization of technology-based products and services: the base case scenarios for three industries. Sloan School Working Paper #176-98, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • Weil HB, Utterback JM. 2005. The dynamics of innovative industries. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Boston, MA.
  • Weil HB, Weil EE. 2001. The road from dependency to empowerment: the destination is worth the journey. Sloan School Working Paper #4102, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. In eBusiness Research@MIT 1(1) 2001.
  • West H, Weil HB. 1999. Technology strategy in commodity industries: in search of a cure for commoditization. Sloan School Working Paper #186-99, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Get PDF (786K)