SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Dehnie S, Sencar T, Memon N. Digital image forensics for identifying computer generated and digital camera images. In Proceedings of IEEE ICIP, 2006; 23132316.
  • 2
    Ng TT, Chang SF, Hsu J, Xie L, Tsui MP. Physics-motivated features for distinguishing photographic images and computer graphics. In Proceedings of ACM Multimedia, 2005; 239248.
  • 3
    Dirik AE, Bayram S, Sencar HT, Memon N. New features to identify computer generated images. In Proceedings of IEEE ICIP. IV, 2007; 433436.
  • 4
    Dirik AE, Memon N. Image tamper detection based on demosaicing artifacts. In Proceedings of IEEE ICIP, 2009; 14971500.
  • 5
    Ng TT, Chang SF. Classifying photographic and photorealistic computer graphic images using natural image statistics. In ADVENT Technical Report, Columbia University, #220-2006-6 (2004).
  • 6
    Wu J, Kamath MV, Poehlman S. Detecting differences between photographs and computer generated images. In Proceedings of the 24th IASTED international conference on Signal processing, pattern recognition, and applications, SPPRA‘06, 2006; 268273.
  • 7
    Chen W, Shi YQ, Xuan GR. Identifying computer graphics using HSV color model and statistical moments of characteristic functions. In Proceedings of ICME, 2007; 11231126.
  • 8
    Sutthiwan P, Cai X, Shi YQ, Zhang H. Computer graphics classification based on Markov process model and boosting feature selection technique. In Proceedings of IEEE ICIP, 2009; 29132916.
  • 9
    Chen DM, Li JH, Wang SL, Li SH. Identifying computer generated and digital camera images using fractional lower order moments. In IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), 2009; 230235.
  • 10
    Li WX, Zhang T, Zheng EG, Ping XJ. Identifying photorealistic computer graphics using second-order difference statistics. In Seventh International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), 2010; 23162319.
  • 11
    Pan F, Huang JW. Discriminating computer graphics images and natural images using hidden Markov tree model. In Proceedings of IWDW, 2010; 2328.
  • 12
    Zhang R, Wang RD. Distinguishing photorealistic computer graphics from natural images by imaging features and visual features. In International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Control (ICECC), 2011; 226229.
  • 13
    Wu RY, Li XL, Yang B. Identifying computer generated graphics VIA histogram features. In Proceedings of ICIP, 2011; 19331936.
  • 14
    Haralick RM, Shanmugan K. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 1973; 3(6):610621.
  • 15
    Ojala T, Pietikainen M, Maenpaa T. Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2002; 24:971987.
  • 16
    Li ZH, Ye JY, Shi YQ. Distinguishing computer graphics from photographic images using local binary patterns. In The 11th IWDW, International Workshop on Digital-forensics and Watermarking , 2012.
  • 17
    Chen W. Detection of digital image and video forgeries. Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept. of ECE, NJIT, 2008.
  • 18
    Weinberger MJ, Seroussi G, Sapiro G. LOCO-I: a low complexity, context-based, lossless image compression algorithm. In Proceedings of Data Compression Conference. DCC '96,1996; 140149.
  • 19
  • 20
    Friedman J, Hastie T. Additive logistic regression: a statistical view of boosting. The Annals of Statistics 2000; 28(2):337407.
  • 21
    Chang CC, Lin CJ. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology 2011; 1–39. Software available at http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm