SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Alchian AA, Demsetz H. 1972. Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review 62(5): 777795.
  • Allen TJ. 1969. Roles in Technical Communication Networks. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
  • Allen TJ. 1977. Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information within the R&D Organization. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
  • Ancona DG, Caldwell DF. 1992. Bridging the boundary: external activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 37(4): 634665.
  • Ansoff HI. 1957. Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review 35(5): 113124.
  • Ansoff HI. 1965. Corporate Strategy: an Analytic Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion. McGraw-Hill: New York.
  • Baldwin CY, Clark KB. 2000. Design Rules. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
  • Barnard CI. 1938. The Functions of the Executive (30th Anniversary edn). Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
  • Barnett WP, Carroll GR. 1995. Modeling internal organizational change. Annual Review of Sociology 21: 217236.
  • Benner MJ. 2004. The incumbent discount: financial institutions and incumbent response to technological change, Wharton working paper: Philadelphia, PA.
  • Benner MJ, Tushman ML. 2003. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review 28(2): 238256.
  • Bower JL. 1970. Managing the Resource Allocation Process: A Study of Corporate Planning and Investment (2nd edn). Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University: Boston, MA.
  • Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM. 1997. The art of continuous change: linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(1): 134.
  • Burgelman RA. 1991. Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: theory and field research. Organization Science 2(3): 239262.
  • Burgelman RA. 2002. Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in. Administrative Science Quarterly 47(2): 325357.
  • Burt RS. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
  • Burt RS. 2000. The network structure of social capital. In Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 22, StawBM, SuttonRI (eds). JAI Press: Greenwich, CT; 345423.
  • Burt RS. 2004. Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology 110(2): 349399.
  • Campbell A, Goold M. 1999. The Collaborative Enterprise: Why Links across the Corporation Often Fail and How to Make Them Work. Perseus Books: Reading, MA.
  • Casciaro T. 2003. Determinants of governance structure in alliances: the role of strategic, task and partner uncertainties. Industrial and Corporate Change 12(6): 12231251.
  • Casciaro T, Lobo MS. 2006. Affective microfoundations of instrumental ties in organizations, Harvard Business School working paper: Boston, MA.
  • Chandler AD. 1962. Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
  • Chandler AD. 1990. Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
  • Child J. 1972. Organizational structure, environment and performance: the role of strategic choice. Sociology 6(1): 122.
  • Christensen CM. 1997. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
  • Clark KB, Wheelwright SC. 1992. Organizing and leading ‘heavyweight’ development teams. California Management Review 34(3): 928.
  • Coleman JS. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94 (Supplement: Organizations and Institutions: Sociological and Economic Approaches to the Analysis of Social Structure): S95–S120.
  • Cyert RM, March JG. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  • Davis JA, Leinhardt S. 1972. The structure of positive interpersonal relations in small groups. In Sociological Theories in Progress, Vol. 2, BergerJ, ZelditchM, AndersonB (eds). Houghton Mifflin: Boston, MA; 218251.
  • Dougherty D. 1992. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science 3(2): 179202.
  • Dunbar RLM, Starbuck WH. 2006. Learning to design organizations and learning from designing them. Organization Science 17(2): 171178.
  • Duncan RB. 1976. The ambidextrous organization: designing dual structures for innovation. Management of Organization: Strategy and Implementation 1: 167188.
  • Durkheim E. 1893. The Division of Labor in Society (HallsWD, Trans.) (1984 edn). Free Press: New York.
  • Dutton JE, Ashford SJ. 1993. Selling issues to top management. Academy of Management Review 18(3): 397428.
  • Eisenmann TR, Bower J. 2000. The entrepreneurial M-form: strategic integration in global media firms. Organization Science 11(3): 348355.
  • Friesen GB, Mills DQ. 1989. Note on how organizations can be structured, Case ♯9-490-040. Harvard Business School Publishing: Boston, MA.
  • Galbraith JR. 1973. Designing Complex Organizations. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.
  • Galbraith JR. 1994. Competing with Flexible Lateral Organizations (2nd edn). Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.
  • Galbraith JR. 2006. Mastering the law of requisite variety with differentiated networks. In The Firm as a Collaborative Community: The Reconstruction of Trust in the Knowledge Economy HeckscherC, AdlerPS (eds). Oxford University Press: New York; 179197.
  • Galunic DC, Eisenhardt KM. 2001. Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms. Academy of Management Journal 44(6): 12291249.
  • Gargiulo M, Benassi M. 2000. Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organization Science 11(2): 183196.
  • Gavetti G, Levinthal DA. 2000. Looking forward and looking backward: cognitive and experiential search. Administrative Science Quarterly 45(1): 113137.
  • Gibbons R, Murphy KJ. 1992. Optimal incentive contracts in the presence of career concerns: theory and evidence. Journal of Political Economy 100(3): 468505.
  • Gilbert C. 2005. Unbundling the structure of inertia: resource versus routine regidity. Academy of Management Journal 48(5): 741763.
  • Gittell JH. 2005. Relational coordination: coordinating work through relationships of shared knowledge, shared goals and mutual respect. In Relational Perspectives in Organization Studies KyriakidouO, ÖzbilginM (eds). Edward Elgar: Northampton, MA.
  • Gould RV, Fernandez RM. 1989. Structures of mediation: a formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Sociological Methodology 19: 89126.
  • Gulati R. 1995. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal 38(1): 85112.
  • Gulati R. 2004. How CEOs manage growth agendas. Harvard Business Review 82(7/8): 124126.
  • Hackman JR. 1987. The design of work teams. In Handbook of Organizational Behavior LorschJW (ed). Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ; 315342.
  • Hambrick DC. 1994. Top management groups: a conceptual integration and reconsideration of the ‘team’ label. In Research in Organizational Behavior StawBM, CummingsLL (eds). JAI Press: Greenwich, CT; 171214.
  • Han S-K. 1996. Structuring relations in on-the-job networks. Social Networks 18(1): 4767.
  • Hannan MT, Freeman J. 1984. Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review 49(2): 149164.
  • Hansen MT. 1999. The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly 44(1): 82111.
  • Hansen MT, Løvås B. 2004. How do multinational companies leverage technological competencies? Moving from single to interdependent explanations. Strategic Management Journal 25(8–9): 801822.
  • Hansen MT, Podolny JM, Pfeffer J. 2001. So many ties, so little time: a task contingency perspective on the value of social capital in organizations. In Social Capital of Organizations, Vol. 18, GabbaySM, LeendersRTAJ (eds). JAI Press: New York; 2158.
  • Hargrave TJ, Van de Ven AH. 2006. A collective action model of institutional innovation. Academy of Management Review 31(4): 864888.
  • He Z-L, Wong P-K. 2004. Exploration vs. exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science 15(4): 481494.
  • Helfat CE, Eisenhardt KM. 2004. Inter-temporal economies of scope, organizational modularity, and the dynamics of diversification. Strategic Management Journal 25(13): 12171232.
  • Henderson RM. 1993. Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: evidence from the photolithographic alignment equipment industry. Rand Journal of Economics 24(2): 248270.
  • Henderson RM, Clark KB. 1990. Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1): 930.
  • Higgins MC. 2005. Career Imprints : Creating Leaders across an Industry (1st edn). Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA.
  • Hill CWL, Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE. 1992. Cooperative versus competitive structures in related and unrelated diversified firms. Organization Science 3(4): 501521.
  • Hill CWL, Hoskisson RE. 1987. Strategy and structure in the multiproduct firm. Academy of Management Review 12(2): 331341.
  • Holmstrom B. 1999. Managerial incentive problems: a dynamic perspective. Review of Economic Studies 66(1): 169182.
    Direct Link:
  • Homans GC. 1951. The Human Group. Harcourt Brace: New York.
  • Hoskisson RE, Hitt MA. 1988. Strategic control systems and relative R&D investment in large multiproduct firms. Strategic Management Journal 9(6): 605621.
  • Hurst DK. 1995. Crisis and Renewal: Meeting the Challenge of Organizational Change. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
  • Ibarra H. 1992. Homophily and differential returns: sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 37(3): 422447.
  • Ibarra H. 1995. Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Academy of Management Journal 38(3): 673703.
  • Jensen MC, Meckling WH. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3(4): 305360.
  • Johansson F. 2004. The Medici Effect: Breakthrough Insights at the Intersection of Ideas, Concepts, and Cultures. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
  • Kanter RM. 1977. Men and Women of the Corporation. Basic Books: New York.
  • Kaplan S, Henderson R. 2005. Inertia and incentives: bridging organizational economics and organizational theory. Organization Science 16(5): 509521.
  • Katila R, Ahuja G. 2002. Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal 45(6): 11831194.
  • Khurana R. 2002. Market triads: a theoretical and empirical analysis of market intermediation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 32(2): 239262.
  • Kleinbaum AM, Tushman ML. 2005. Interdependence and innovation: management of exploration and exploitation at the corporate level. Paper presented at Academy of Management Annual Meeting: Honolulu, HI.
  • Kotter JP. 1982. The General Managers. Free Press: New York.
  • Krackhardt D. 1990. Assessing the political landscape: structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(2): 342369.
  • Krackhardt D, Porter LW. 1986. The snowball effect: turnover embedded in communication networks. Journal of Applied Psychology 71(1): 5055.
  • Krackhardt D, Stern RN. 1988. Informal networks and organizational crises: an experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly 51(2): 123140.
  • Kretschmer T, Puranam P. 2004. Realizing synergies in complex organizations: when are collaborative incentives useful? London School of Economics working paper.
  • Labianca G, Brass DJ, Gray B. 1998. Social networks and perceptions of intergroup conflict: the role of negative relationships and third parties. Academy of Management Journal 41(1): 5567.
  • Leonard-Barton D. 1992. Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal 13(Summer Special Issue): 111125.
  • Levinthal DA. 1997. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Science 43(7): 934950.
  • March JG. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2(1): 7187.
  • March JG, Simon HA. 1958. Organizations (1993 edn). Blackwell: Cambridge, MA.
  • Martin JA, Eisenhardt KM. 2003. Cross-business synergy: recombination, modularity and the multi-business team, Best Paper Proceedings. Academy of Management: Seattle, WA.
  • McCann J, Galbraith JR. 1980. Interdepartmental relations. In Handbook of Organizational Design, Vol. 2, NystromPC, StarbuckWH (eds). Oxford University Press: New York; 6084.
  • McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM. 2001. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27(1): 415444.
  • Mehta SN, Burke D. 2005. Will Wall Street ever trust Time Warner? Fortune 151: 7684.
  • Miles RE, Snow CC. 1978. Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. McGraw-Hill: New York.
  • Mintzberg H, Waters JA. 1985. Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal 6(3): 257272.
  • Mizruchi MS, Stearns LB. 2001. Getting deals done: the use of social networks in bank decision-making. American Sociological Review 66(5): 647671.
  • Montgomery CA, Wernerfelt B. 1988. Diversification, Ricardian rents, and Tobin's q. Rand Journal of Economics 19(4): 623632.
  • Nadler D, Tushman M. 1997. Competing by Design: The Power of Organizational Architecture. Oxford University Press: New York.
  • Nadler DA, Tushman ML. 1988. Strategic linking: designing formal coordination mechanisms. In Readings in the Management of Innovation (2nd edn), TushmanML, MooreWL (eds). Ballinger: Cambridge, MA; 469486.
  • Nelson RE. 1989. The strength of strong ties: social networks and intergroup conflict in organizations. Academy of Management Journal 32(2): 377401.
  • Nohria N, Ghoshal S. 1997. The Differentiated Network: Organizing Multinational Corporations for Value Creation. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA.
  • O'Reilly CA, Tushman ML. 2004. The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review 82(4): 7481.
  • Obstfeld D. 2005. Social networks, the Tertius Iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 50(1): 100130.
  • Perry-Smith JE, Shalley CE. 2003. The social side of creativity: a static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review 28(1): 89106.
  • Pfeffer J. 1981. Management as symbolic action: the creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms. In Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 3, StawBM, CummingsLL (eds). JAI Press: Greenwich, CT; 152.
  • Pfeffer J. 1992. Managing with Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
  • Pfeffer J, Salancik GR. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (2003 edn). Stanford Business Classics: Stanford, CA.
  • Podolny JM. 2001. Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. American Journal of Sociology 107(1): 3360.
  • Podolny JM, Baron JN. 1997. Resources and relationships: social networks and mobility in the workplace. American Sociological Review 62(5): 673693.
  • Prendergast C. 1999. The provision of incentives in firms. Journal of Economic Literature 37(1): 763.
  • Quinn JB. 1978. Strategic change: ‘logical incrementalism.’ Sloan Management Review 20(1): 721.
  • Reagans R, Zuckerman EW. 2001. Networks, diversity, and productivity: the social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organization Science 12(4): 502517.
  • Rotemberg JJ, Saloner G. 2000. Visionaries, managers, and strategic direction. Rand Journal of Economics 31(4): 693716.
  • Roy D. 1952. Quota restriction and goldbricking in a machine shop. American Journal of Sociology 57(5): 427442.
  • Rumelt RP. 1974. Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance. Division of Research, Harvard Business School: Boston, MA.
  • Schein EH. 1985. Organizational Culture and Leadership (2nd edn). Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA.
  • Siggelkow N, Levinthal DA. 2003. Temporarily divide to conquer: centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organization Science 14(6): 650669.
  • Siggelkow N, Rivkin JW. 2006. When exploration backfires: unintended consequences of multilevel organizational search. Academy of Management Journal 49(4): 779795.
  • Simmel G. 1902. The Sociology of Georg Simmel (WolffKH, Trans.) (1950 edn). Free Press: Glencoe, IL.
  • Simon HA. 1945. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization (3rd edn). Free Press: Boston, MA.
  • Simon HA. 1962. The architecture of complexity. Procedings of the American Philosophical Society 106: 467482.
  • Simons R. 2005. Levers of Organization Design: How Managers Use Accountability Systems for Greater Performance and Commitment. Harvard Business School Press: Boston.
  • Smith A. 1776. An inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1976 edn). Norman S. Berg: Dunwoody, GA.
  • Smith WK, Tushman ML. 2005. Managing strategic contradictions: a top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science 16(5): 522536.
  • Smith WK, Tushman ML. 2007. Senior teams and strategic contradictions: how top management teams exploit and explore simultaneously. Harvard Business School working paper. Boston, MA.
  • Sørensen JB, Stuart TE. 2000. Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 45(1): 81112.
  • Stewart GL, Barrick MR. 2000. Team structure and performance: assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of Management Journal 43(2): 135148.
  • Stonich PJ. 1981. Using rewards in implementing strategy. Strategic Management Journal 2(4): 345352.
  • Teece DJ, Pisano GP, Shuen A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18(7): 509533.
  • Thompson JD. 1967. Organizations in Action; Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (2nd edn). Transaction Publishers: New Brunswick, NJ.
  • Tripsas M, Gavetti G. 2000. Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal 21(10–11): 11471161.
  • Tsai W. 2000. Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intraorganizational linkages. Strategic Management Journal 21(9): 925939.
  • Tsai W, Ghoshal S. 1998. Social capital and value creation: the role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal 41(4): 464476.
  • Tushman ML. 1977. Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Administrative Science Quarterly 22(4): 587605.
  • Tushman ML. 1979. Work characteristics and subunit communication structure: a contingency analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 24(1): 8298.
  • Tushman ML, Anderson P. 1986. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly 31(3): 439465.
  • Tushman ML, Katz R. 1980. External communication and project performance: an investigation into the role of gatekeepers. Management Science 26(11): 10711085.
  • Tushman ML, O'Reilly CA. 1996. Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review 38(4): 831.
  • Tushman ML, Romanelli E. 1985. Organizational evolution: a metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. In Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 7, CummingsLL, StawBM (eds). JAI Press: Greenwich, CT; 171222.
  • Tushman ML, Scanlan TJ. 1981. Characteristics and external orientations of boundary spanning individuals. Academy of Management Journal 24(1): 8398.
  • Tushman ML, Smith W. 2002. Organizational technology. In Blackwell Companion to Organizations BaumJAC (ed). Blackwell: London; 386414.
  • Tushman ML, Smith W, Wood R, Westerman G, O'Reilly CA. 2005. Innovation streams and ambidextrous organizational designs: on building dynamic capabilities, Harvard Business School working paper. Boston, MA.
  • Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD. 1995. Product Design and Development. McGraw-Hill: New York.
  • Uzzi B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(1): 3567.
  • Van de Ven AH, Delbecq AL, Koenig R, Jr. 1976. Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review 41(2): 322338.
  • Villalonga B. 2004. Diversification discount or premium? New evidence from the business information Tracking Series. Journal of Finance 59(2): 479506.
  • Wageman R. 1995. Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly 40(1): 145180.
  • Wageman R, Gordon FM. 2005. As the twig is bent: how group values shape emergent task interdependence in groups. Organization Science 16(6): 687700.
  • Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D. 2005. Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science 16(4): 409421.
  • Williamson OE. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies, Analysis and Antitrust Implications: A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization. Free Press: New York.