Research Article
A comparative study of one-level and two-level semiparametric estimation of hemodynamic response function for fMRI data
Article first published online: 5 JUN 2007
DOI: 10.1002/sim.2936
Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Issue
1097-0258/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=64ebf4a6597e744f418c952845cddf175ccc795f)
Statistics in Medicine
Special Issue: Statistical Analysis of Neuronal Data (SAND3)
Volume 26, Issue 21, pages 3845–3861, 20 September 2007
Additional Information
How to Cite
Zhang, C. M., Jiang, Y. and Yu, T. (2007), A comparative study of one-level and two-level semiparametric estimation of hemodynamic response function for fMRI data. Statistics in Medicine, 26: 3845–3861. doi: 10.1002/sim.2936
Publication History
- Issue published online: 14 AUG 2007
- Article first published online: 5 JUN 2007
- Manuscript Accepted: 19 APR 2007
- Manuscript Received: 18 APR 2007
Funded by
- Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation
- National Science Foundation. Grant Numbers: DMS-03-53941, DMS-07-05209
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- false discovery rate;
- multiple comparison;
- semiparametric test;
- smoothing splines;
- stimuli;
- time resolution
Abstract
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is emerging as a powerful tool for studying the process underlying the working of the many regions of the human brain. The standard tool for analyzing fMRI data is some variant of the linear model, which is restrictive in modeling assumptions. In this paper, we develop a semiparametric approach, based on the cubic smoothing splines, to obtain statistically more efficient estimates of the underlying hemodynamic response function (HRF) associated with fMRI experiments. The hypothesis testing of HRF is conducted to identify the brain regions which are activated when a subject performs a particular task. Furthermore, we compare one-level and two-level semiparametric estimates of HRF in significance tests for detecting the activated brain regions. Our simulation studies demonstrate that the one-level estimates combined with a bias-correction procedure perform best in detecting the activated brain regions. We illustrate this method using a real fMRI data set and compare it with popular methods offered by AFNI and FSL. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

1097-0258/asset/SIM_left.gif?v=1&s=1b631772c3897aa95941da3609d901cd1d389e83)
1097-0258/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=6d257623b3308a7485294c87b3b5e1e665484099)