Research Article
Dose–schedule finding in phase I/II clinical trials using a Bayesian isotonic transformation
Article first published online: 18 JUN 2008
DOI: 10.1002/sim.3329
Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Li, Y., Bekele, B. N., Ji, Y. and Cook, J. D. (2008), Dose–schedule finding in phase I/II clinical trials using a Bayesian isotonic transformation. Statistics in Medicine, 27: 4895–4913. doi: 10.1002/sim.3329
Publication History
- Issue published online: 12 SEP 2008
- Article first published online: 18 JUN 2008
- Manuscript Accepted: 11 APR 2008
- Manuscript Received: 12 NOV 2006
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- Bayesian adaptive design;
- efficacy;
- matrix order;
- minimum lower sets algorithm;
- partial order;
- toxicity
Abstract
A dose–schedule-finding trial is a new type of oncology trial in which investigators aim to find a combination of dose and treatment schedule that has a large probability of efficacy yet a relatively small probability of toxicity. We demonstrate that a major difference between traditional dose-finding and dose–schedule-finding trials is that while the toxicity probabilities follow a simple nondecreasing order in dose-finding trials, those of dose–schedule-finding trials may adhere to a matrix order. We show that the success of a dose–schedule-finding method requires careful statistical modeling and a sensible dose–schedule allocation scheme. We propose a Bayesian hierarchical model that jointly models the unordered probabilities of toxicity and efficacy and apply a Bayesian isotonic transformation to the posterior samples of the toxicity probabilities, so that the transformed posterior samples adhere to the matrix-order constraints. On the basis of the joint posterior distribution of the order-constrained toxicity probabilities and the unordered efficacy probabilities, we develop a dose–schedule-finding algorithm that sequentially allocates patients to the best dose–schedule combination under certain criteria. We illustrate our methodology through its application to a clinical trial in leukemia and compare it with two alternative approaches. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

1097-0258/asset/SIM_left.gif?v=1&s=1b631772c3897aa95941da3609d901cd1d389e83)
1097-0258/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=6d257623b3308a7485294c87b3b5e1e665484099)
1097-0258/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=64ebf4a6597e744f418c952845cddf175ccc795f)