Comparing paired vs non-paired statistical methods of analyses when making inferences about absolute risk reductions in propensity-score matched samples
Version of Record online: 21 FEB 2011
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Statistics in Medicine
Volume 30, Issue 11, pages 1292–1301, 20 May 2011
How to Cite
Austin, P. C. (2011), Comparing paired vs non-paired statistical methods of analyses when making inferences about absolute risk reductions in propensity-score matched samples. Statist. Med., 30: 1292–1301. doi: 10.1002/sim.4200
- Issue online: 2 MAY 2011
- Version of Record online: 21 FEB 2011
- Manuscript Accepted: 21 DEC 2010
- Manuscript Received: 6 JUL 2010
- Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Terms and Conditions set out at [http://wileyonlinelibrary.com/author resources/onlineopen.html]
- 8A substantial and confusing variation exists in handling of baseline covariates in randomized controlled trials: a review of trials published in leading medical journals. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2010; 63:142–153. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.002., , , , .
- 9The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating difference in proportions (risk differences or absolute risk reductions) in observational studies. Statistics in Medicine 2010; 29:2137–2148. DOI: 10.1002/sim.3854..
- 13An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis. Wiley: New York, NY, 1996..