SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Harris KM, Bearman PS, Udry JR. The national longitudinal study of adolescent health: Research design, (2010). Available from: http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design.
  • 2
    Lewis K, Kaufman J, Gonzalez M, Wimmer A, Christakis N. Tastes, ties, and time: A new social network dataset using Facebook.com. Social Networks 2008; 30:330342.
  • 3
    Bond RM, Fariss CJ, Jones JJ, Settle AKE, Marlow C, Fowler JH. A massive scale experiment in social influence and political mobilization, (2012). Under Review.
  • 4
    Christakis NA, Fowler JH. Social network sensors for early detection of contagious outbreaks. PloS one 2010; 5:e12948.
  • 5
    Apicella CL, Marlowe FW, Fowler JH, Christakis NA. Social networks and cooperation in hunter-gatherers. Nature 2012; 481:497501.
  • 6
    Fowler JH, Christakis NA. Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2010; 107:53345338.
  • 7
    Rand DG, Arbesman S, Christakis NA. Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2011; 108:1919319198.
  • 8
    Fowler JH, Dawes CT, Christakis NA. Model of genetic variation in human social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2009; 106:17201724.
  • 9
    O'Malley AJ, Christakis N. Longitudinal analysis of large social networks: Estimating the effect of health traits on changes in friendship ties. Statistics in Medicine 2011; 30:950964.
  • 10
    Christakis NA, Fowler JH, Imbens GW, Kalyanaraman K. An empirical model for strategic network formation, (2010). National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series. 16039.
  • 11
    Onnela J-P, Christakis NA. Spreading paths in partially observed social networks. Physical Review E 2012; 85:036106.
  • 12
    Onnela J-P, Arbesman S, González MC, Barabási A-L, Christakis NA. Geographic constraints on social network groups. PloS one 2011; 6:e16939.
  • 13
    Fowler JH, Settle JE, Christakis NA. Correlated genotypes in friendship networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2011; 108:19931997.
  • 14
    Christakis NA, Fowler JH. The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England Journal of Medicine 2007; 357:370379.
  • 15
    Fowler JH, Christakis NA. Estimating peer effects on health in social networks: A response to Cohen-Cole and Fletcher; and Trogdon, Nonnemaker, and Pais. Journal of Health Economics 2008; 27:14001405.
  • 16
    Christakis NA, Fowler JH. The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. New England Journal of Medicine 2008; 358:22492258.
  • 17
    Rosenquist JN, Murabito J, Fowler JH, Christakis NA. The spread of alcohol consumption behavior in a large social network. Annals of Internal Medicine 2010; 152:426433.
  • 18
    Keating NL, O'Malley AJ, Murabito JM, Smith KP, Christakis NA. Minimal social network effects evident in cancer screening behavior. Cancer 2011; 117:30453052.
  • 19
    Fowler JH, Christakis N. Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: Longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham heart study. British Medical Journal 2008; 337:a2338.
  • 20
    Cacioppo JT, Fowler JH, Christakis NA. Alone in the crowd: The structure and spread of loneliness in a large social network. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009; 97:977991.
  • 21
    Rosenquist JN, Fowler JH, Christakis NA. Social network determinants of depression. Molecular Psychiatry 2011; 16:273281.
  • 22
    Mednick SC, Christakis NA, Fowler JH. The spread of sleep loss influences drug use in adolescent social networks. PloS one 2010; 5:e9775.
  • 23
    McDermott R, Fowler JH, Christakis NA. Breaking up is hard to do, unless everyone else is doing it too: Social network effects on divorce in a longitudinal sample followed for 32 years, (2009). SSRN eLibrary Available from:http://ssrn.com/paper=1490708.
  • 24
    Pachucki MA, Jacques PF, Christakis NA. Social network concordance in food choice among spouses, friends, and siblings. American Journal of Public Health 2011; 101:21702177.
  • 25
    Brakefield TA, Mednick SC, Wilson HW, deNeve JE, Christakis NA, Fowler JH. Sexual orientation does not spread in adolescent social networks, (2012). Submitted.
  • 26
    Fowler JH, Christakis NA. On Facebook, a picture is worth a thousand words, (2009). Available from: http://www.connectedthebook.com/pages/links/tastes\_on\_facebook.html.
  • 27
    Christakis NA, Fowler JH. Connected: The Surprising Power of our Social Networks and How They Shape Our Lives. Little Brown and Co.:New York, 2009.
  • 28
    Smith KP, Christakis NA. Social networks and health. Annual Review of Sociology 2008; 34:405429.
  • 29
    Wasserman S, Faust K. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press:Cambridge, U.K., 1994.
  • 30
    Jackson MO. Social and Economic Networks. Princeton University Press:Princeton, N.J., 2008.
  • 31
    Goyal S. Connections: An Introduction to the Economics of Networks. Princeton University Press:Princeton, N.J., 2007.
  • 32
    O'Malley A, Marsden P. The analysis of social networks. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology 2008; 8:222269.
  • 33
    Newman MEJ. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review 2003; 45:167256.
  • 34
    Newman MEJ. Networks: An Introduction. Oxford University Press:Oxford, U.K., 2010.
  • 35
    Easley D, Kleinberg J. Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World. Cambridge University Press:Cambridge, U.K., 2010.
  • 36
    Kolaczyk ED. Statistical Analysis of Network Data: Methods and Models. Springer:New York, N.Y., 2009.
  • 37
    Dawber TR. The Framingham Study: The Epidemiology of Atherosclerotic Disease. Harvard University Press:Cambridge, Mass., 1980.
  • 38
    Feinleib M, Kannel WB, Garrison RJ, McNamara PM, Castelli WP. The framingham offspring study. Design and preliminary data. Preventive Medicine 1975; 4:518525.
  • 39
    Campbell KE, Lee BA. Name generators in surveys of personal networks. Social Networks 1991; 13:203221.
  • 40
    Marsden PV. 2005. Recent developments in network measurement, In Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis, Carrington PJ, Scott J, Wasserman S (eds), Cambridge University Press,Cambridge, U.K.
  • 41
    Marsden PV. Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review 1987; 52:122131.
  • 42
    McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Brashears ME. Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review 2006; 71:353375.
  • 43
    O'Malley AJ, Arbesman S, Steiger DM, Fowler JH, Christakis NA. Social network structure, health, and pro-social behaviors in a national panel study of Americans, (2012). PLoS One. In press.
  • 44
    Szábo G, Barabási A-L., Network effects in service usage, (2007). Available from: http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/physics/0611177.
  • 45
    Hubert LJ. Assignment Methods in Combinatorial Data Analysis. M. Dekker:New York, 1987.
  • 46
    Dekker D, Krackhardt D, Snijders T. Sensitivity of MRQAP Tests to Collinearity and Autocorrelation Conditions. Psychometrika 2007; 72:563581.
  • 47
    Thomas AC, Censoring out-degree compromises inferences of social network contagion and autocorrelation, (2010). Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.1636.
  • 48
    Fisher RA. On the interpretation of X2 from contingency tables, and the calculation of P. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1922; 85:8794.
  • 49
    Lyons R, The spread of evidence-poor medicine via flawed social-network analysis. (2010). Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1007.2876.
  • 50
    McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 2001; 27:415444.
  • 51
    Valente TW. Models and methods for innovation diffusion. 2005, In Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis, Carrington PJ, Scott J, Wasserman S (eds), Cambridge University Press,Cambridge, U.K.
  • 52
    Aral S, Muchnik L, Sundararajan A. Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2009; 106:2154421549.
  • 53
    Gorin AA, Wing RR, Fava JL, Jakicic JM, Jeffery R, West DS, Brelje K, DiLillo VG. Weight loss treatment influences untreated spouses and the home environment: Evidence of a ripple effect. International Journal of Obesity 2008; 32:16781684.
  • 54
    Nickerson DW. Is voting contagious? evidence from two field experiments. American Political Science Review 2008; 102:4957.
  • 55
    Moody J, McFarland D, Bender-deMoll S. Dynamic network visualization. American Journal of Sociology 2005; 110:12061241.
  • 56
    Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman JH. The Elements of Sstatistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. Springer:New York, NY, 2009.
  • 57
    Kamada T, Kawai S. An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters 1989; 31:715.
  • 58
    Fruchterman TMJ, Reingold EM. Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software: Practice and Experience 1991; 21:11291164.
  • 59
    Travers J, Milgram S. An experimental study in the small world problem. Sociometry 1969; 35:425443.
  • 60
    Dodds PS, Muhamad R, Watts DJ. An experimental study of search in global social networks. Science 2003; 301:827829.
  • 61
    Brown JJ, Reingen PH. Social ties and word of mouth referral behavior. Journal of Consumer Research 1987; 14:350362.
  • 62
    Singh J. Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Science 2005; 51:756770.
  • 63
    Bliss CA, Kloumann IM, Harris KD, Danforth CM, Dodds PS. Twitter reciprocal reply networks exhibit assortativity with respect to happiness, (2011). Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1112.1010.
  • 64
    Liang K-Y, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986; 73:1322.
  • 65
    Elwert F, Christakis N. Wives and ex-wives: A new test for homogamy bias in the widowhood effect. Demography 2008; 45:851873.
  • 66
    Schildcrout JS, Heagerty PJ. Regression analysis of longitudinal binary data with time-dependent environmental covariates: Bias and efficiency. Biostatistics 2005; 6:633652.
  • 67
    Beck N. Time-series–cross-section data: What have we learned in the past few years? Annual Review of Political Science 2001; 4:271293.
  • 68
    Banerjee A, Dolado JJ, Galbraith JW, Hendry D. Co-integration, Error Correction, and the Econometric Analysis of Non-Stationary Data. Oxford University Press:Oxford, 1993.
  • 69
    De Boef S, Keele L. Taking time seriously. American Journal of Political Science 2008; 52:184200.
  • 70
    VanderWeele TJ, Ogburn EL, Tchetgen EJ. Why and when “flawed” social network analyses still yield valid tests of no contagion. Statistics, Politics, and Policy 2012; 3:111.
  • 71
    Steglich C, Snijders TAB, West P. Applying SIENA: An illustrative analysis of the eo-evolution of adolescents’ friendship networks, taste in music, and alcohol consumption. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences 2006; 2:4856.
  • 72
    Steglich C, Snijders TAB, Pearson M. Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Sociological Methodology 2010; 40:329393.
  • 73
    Mercken L, Snijders TAB, Steglich C, Vertiainen E, De V H. Smoking-based selection and influence in gender-segregated friendship networks: A social network analysis of adolescent smoking. Addiction 2010; 105:12801289.
  • 74
    Mercken L, Snijders TAB, Steglich C, Vartiainen E, de Vries H. Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior. Social Networks 2010; 32:7281.
  • 75
    Lewis K, Gonzalez M, Kaufman J. Social selection and peer influence in an online social network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2012; 109:6872.
  • 76
    Manski CF. Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. The Review of Economic Studies 1993; 60:531542.
  • 77
    Shalizi CR, Thomas AC. Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies. Sociological Methods & Research 2011; 40:211239.
  • 78
    Noel H, Nyhan B. The “unfriending” problem: The consequences of homophily in friendship retention for causal estimates of social influence. Social Networks 2011; 33:211218.
  • 79
    Fowler JH, Heaney MT, Nickerson DW, Padgett JF, Sinclair B. Causality in political networks. American Politics Research 2011; 39:437480.
  • 80
    Smith GCS, Pell JP. Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials. British Medical Journal 2003; 327:14591461.
  • 81
    Cohen-Cole E, Fletcher JM. Detecting implausible social network effects in acne, height, and headaches: Longitudinal analysis. British Medical Journal 2008; 337:a2533.
  • 82
    VanderWeele TJ. Sensitivity analysis for contagion effects in social networks. Sociological Methods & Research 2011; 40:240255.
  • 83
    Strully KW, Fowler JH, Murabito JM, Benjamin EJ, Levy D, Christakis NA. Aspirin use and cardiovascular events in social networks. Social Science & Medicine 2012; 74:11251129.
  • 84
    Visscher PM, Medland SE, Ferreira MAR, Morley KI, Zhu G, Cornes BK, Montgomery GW, Martin NG. Assumption-free estimation of heritability from genome-wide identity-by-descent sharing between full siblings. PLoS Genetics 2006; 2:e41.
  • 85
    VanderWeele TJ, Arah OA. Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounding for general outcomes, treatments, and confounders. Epidemiology 2011; 22:4252.
  • 86
    Mercken L, Candel M, Willems P, De Vries H. Disentangling social selection and social influence effects on adolescent smoking: The importance of reciprocity in friendships. Addiction 2007; 102:14831492.
  • 87
    Anagnostopoulos A, Kumar R, Mahdian M. Influence and correlation in social networks, Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2008;715.
  • 88
    Bramoullé Y, Djebbari H, Fortin B. Identification of peer effects through social networks. Journal of Econometrics 2009; 150:4155.
  • 89
    Iwashyna T, Gebremariam A, Hutchins M, Lee J. Can longitudinal GEE models distinguish network influence and homophily? An agent-based modeling approach to measurement characteristics, (2012). Under Review.
  • 90
    Block JP, Christakis NA, O'Malley AJ, Subramanian SV. Proximity to food establishments and body mass index in the framingham heart study offspring cohort over 30 years. American Journal of Epidemiology 2011; 174:11081114.
  • 91
    Hidalgo CA, Blumm N, Barabási A-L, Christakis NA. A dynamic network approach for the study of human phenotypes. PLoS Computer Biology 2009; 5:e1000353.
  • 92
    Fowler JH. Connecting the congress: A study of cosponsorship networks. Political Analysis 2006; 14:456487.
  • 93
    Fowler JH. Legislative cosponsorship networks in the U.S. House and Senate. Social Networks 2006; 28:454465.
  • 94
    Fowler JH, Jeon S. The authority of Supreme Court precedent. Social Networks 2008; 30:1630.
  • 95
    Fowler JH, Johnson TR, Spriggs JF, Jeon S, Wahlbeck PJ. Network analysis and the law: Measuring the legal importance of precedents at the U.S. Supreme Court. Political Analysis 2007; 15:324346.
  • 96
    Barnes MG, Smith TG, Yoder J. Economic insecurity and the spread of obesity in social networks. Social Science Research Network 2010. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract\_id=1552185.
  • 97
    Brown H, Hole AR, Roberts J, Going the same “weigh”: Spousal correlations in obesity in the U.K. 2010, Department of Economics, University of Sheffield, U.K. Working Paper.
  • 98
    de la Haye K, Robins G, Mohr P, Wilson C. Obesity-related behaviors in adolescent friendship networks. Social Networks 2010; 32:161167.
  • 99
    Trogdon JG, Nonnemaker J, Pais J. Peer effects in adolescent overweight. Journal of Health Economics 2008; 27:13881399.
  • 100
    Halliday TJ, Kwak S. Weight gain in adolescents and their peers. Economics & Human Biology 2009; 7:181190.
  • 101
    Carrell SE, Hoekstra M, West JE. Is poor fitness contagious?: Evidence from randomly assigned friends. Journal of Public Economics 2011; 95:657663.
  • 102
    McFerran B, Dahl DW, Fitzsimons GJ, Morales AC. Might an overweight waitress make you eat more? How the body type of others is sufficient to alter our food consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology 2010; 20:146151.
  • 103
    Madan A, Moturu ST, Lazer D, Pentland A. Social sensing: Obesity, unhealthy eating and exercise in face-to-face networks. Wireless Health 2010 2010:104110.
  • 104
    McCaffery JM, Franz CE, Jacobson K, Leahey TM, Xian H, Wing RR, Lyons MJ, Kremen WS. Effects of social contact and zygosity on 21-y weight change in male twins. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2011; 94:404409.
  • 105
    Leahey TM, LaRose JG, Fava JL, Wing RR. Social influences are associated with BMI and weight loss intentions in young adults. Obesity 2011; 19:11571162.
  • 106
    Leahey TM, Crane MM, Pinto AM, Weinberg B, Kumar R, Wing RR. Effect of teammates on changes in physical activity in a statewide campaign. Preventive Medicine 2010; 51:4549.
  • 107
    Hruschka DJ, Brewis AA, Wutich A, Morin B. Shared norms and their explanation for the social clustering of obesity. American Journal of Public Health 2011; 101:S295–S300.
  • 108
    Centola D. The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science 2010; 329:11941197.
  • 109
    Centola D. An experimental study of homophily in the adoption of health behavior. Science 2011; 334:12691272.
  • 110
    de la Haye K, Robins G, Mohr P, Wilson C. Homophily and contagion as explanations for weight similarities among adolescent friends. Journal of Adolescent Health 2011; 49:421427.
  • 111
    Campbell MC, Mohr GS. Seeing is eating: How and when activation of a negative stereotype increases stereotype-conducive behavior. Journal of Consumer Research 2011; 38:431444.
  • 112
    Burke MA, Heiland FW, Nadler CM. From “overweight” to “about right”: Evidence of a generational shift in body weight norms. Obesity 2010; 18:12261234.
  • 113
    Hatfield E, Cacioppo JT, Rapson RL. Emotional Contagion. Cambridge University Press:Cambridge, U.K., 1994.
  • 114
    Knight J, Gunatilaka R. The rural-urban divide in China: Income but not happiness? Journal of Development Studies 2010; 46:506534.
  • 115
    Eisenberg D, Golberstein E, Whitelock JL, Downs MF. Social contagion of mental health: Evidence from college roomates, (2010). Working Paper.
  • 116
    Schwarze J, Winkelmann R. Happiness and altruism within the extended family. Journal of Population Economics 2011; 24:10331051.
  • 117
    Ali MM, Dwyer DS. Estimating peer effects in adolescent smoking behavior: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Adolescent Health 2009; 45:402408.
  • 118
    Cobb NK, Graham AL, Abrams DB. Social network structure of a large online community for smoking cessation. American Journal of Public Health 2010; 100:12821289.
  • 119
    Mermelstein RJ, Colvin PJ, Klingemann SD. Dating and changes in adolescent cigarette smoking: Does partner smoking behavior matter? Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2009; 11:12261230.
  • 120
    Valente TW, Hoffman BR, Ritt-Olson A, Lichtman K, Johnson CA. Effects of a social-network method for group assignment strategies on peer-led tobacco prevention programs in schools. American Journal of Public Health 2003; 93:18371843.
  • 121
    Valente TW, Ritt-Olson A, Stacy A, Unger JB, Okamoto J, Sussman S. Peer acceleration: Effects of a social network tailored substance abuse prevention program among high-risk adolescents. Addiction 2007; 102:18041815.
  • 122
    Campbell R, Starkey F, Holliday J, Audrey S, Bloor M, Parry-Langdon N, Hughes R, Moore L. An informal school-based peer-led intervention for smoking prevention in adolescence (ASSIST): A cluster randomised trial. The Lancet 2008; 371:15951602.
  • 123
    Horton JJ, Rand DG, Zeckhauser RJ. The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market, (2010). National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series 15961.
  • 124
    Aral S, Walker D. Creating social contagion through viral product design: A randomized trial of peer influence in networks. Management Science 2011; 57:16231639.
  • 125
    O'Malley AJ, Rosenquist JN, Elwest F, Zaslavsky AM, Christakis NA. Estimation of peer effects using longitudinal data and genetic alleles as instrumental variables, (2012). Working Paper.
  • 126
    Lazer D, Pentland A, Adamic L, Aral S, Barabási A-L, Brewer D, Christakis N, Contractor N, Fowler J, Gutmann M, Jebara T, King G, Macy M, Roy D, Van Alstyne M. Computational Social Science. Science 2009; 323:721723.