Get access

Qualitative interaction trees: a tool to identify qualitative treatment–subgroup interactions

Authors

  • Elise Dusseldorp,

    Corresponding author
    1. Statistics Group, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Wassenaarseweg 56, Leiden, The Netherlands
    2. Department of Psychology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Tiensestraat 102 – bus 3713, Leuven, Belgium
    • Correspondence to: Elise Dusseldorp, Statistics Group, TNO, PO Box 2215, 2301 CE Leiden, The Netherlands.

      E-mail: elise.dusseldorp@tno.nl

    Search for more papers by this author
  • Iven Van Mechelen

    1. Department of Psychology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Tiensestraat 102 – bus 3713, Leuven, Belgium
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

When two alternative treatments (A and B) are available, some subgroup of patients may display a better outcome with treatment A than with B, whereas for another subgroup, the reverse may be true. If this is the case, a qualitative (i.e., disordinal) treatment–subgroup interaction is present. Such interactions imply that some subgroups of patients should be treated differently and are therefore most relevant for personalized medicine. In case of data from randomized clinical trials with many patient characteristics that could interact with treatment in a complex way, a suitable statistical approach to detect qualitative treatment–subgroup interactions is not yet available. As a way out, in the present paper, we propose a new method for this purpose, called QUalitative INteraction Trees (QUINT). QUINT results in a binary tree that subdivides the patients into terminal nodes on the basis of patient characteristics; these nodes are further assigned to one of three classes: a first for which A is better than B, a second for which B is better than A, and an optional third for which type of treatment makes no difference. Results of QUINT on simulated data showed satisfactory performance, with regard to optimization and recovery. Results of an application to real data suggested that, compared with other approaches, QUINT provided a more pronounced picture of the qualitative interactions that are present in the data. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary