• 1
    Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 1983; 70: 4155.
  • 2
    Rosenbaum PR. Model-based direct adjustment. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1987; 82: 387394.
  • 3
    Austin PC. Propensity-score matching in the cardiovascular surgery literature from 2004 to 2006: a systematic review and suggestions for improvement. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2007; 134(5):11281135.
  • 4
    Austin PC. A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003. Statistics in Medicine 2008; 27(12):20372049.
  • 5
    Thoemmes FJ, Kim ES. A systematic review of propensity score methods in the social sciences. Multivariate Behavioral Research 2011; 46(1):90118.
  • 6
    Austin PC. A report card on propensity-score matching in the cardiology literature from 2004 to 2006: a systematic review and suggestions for improvement. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 2008; 1: 6267.
  • 7
    Imbens GW. Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: a review. Review of Economics and Statistics 2004; 86: 429.
  • 8
    Rosenbaum PR. Observational Studies. Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, 2002.
  • 9
    Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician 1985; 39: 3338.
  • 10
    Austin PC. Some methods of propensity-score matching had superior performance to others: results of an empirical investigation and Monte Carlo simulations. Biometrical Journal 2009; 51(1):171184.
  • 11
    Austin PC. Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharmaceutical Statistics 2011; 10: 150161.
  • 12
    Cochran WG, Rubin DB. Controlling bias in observational studies: a review. Sankhya: The Indian Journal of Statistics 1973; 35: 416466.
  • 13
    Tu JV, Donovan LR, Lee DS, Wang JT, Austin PC, Alter DA, Ko DT. Effectiveness of public report cards for improving the quality of cardiac care: the EFFECT study: a randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Association 2009; 302(21):23302337.
  • 14
    Tu JV, Donovan LR, Lee DS, Austin PC, Ko DT, Wang JT, Newman AM. Quality of cardiac care in Ontario, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences: Toronto, Ontario, 2004.
  • 15
    Austin PC. A data-generation process for data with specified risk differences or numbers needed to treat. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 2010; 39: 563577. DOI: 10.1080/03610910903528301.
  • 16
    Sturmer T, Joshi M, Glynn RJ, Avorn J, Rothman KJ, Schneeweiss S. A review of the application of propensity score methods yielded increasing use, advantages in specific settings, but not substantially different estimates compared with conventional multivariable methods. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2006; 59(5):437447.
  • 17
    Austin PC, Grootendorst P, Anderson GM. A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study. Statistics in Medicine 2007; 26(4):734753.
  • 18
    Flury BK, Riedwyl H. Standard distance in univariate and multivariate analysis. The American Statistician 1986; 40: 249251.
  • 19
    Austin PC. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Statistics in Medicine 2009; 28(25):30833107.
  • 20
    Austin PC. A tutorial on the use of propensity scoremethods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: Reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments. Statistics in Medicine In press. DOI: 10.1002/sim.5984.
  • 21
    Austin PC, Mamdani MM. A comparison of propensity scoremethods: A case-study estimating the effectiveness of post-AMI statin use. Statistics in Medicine 2006; 25: 20842106. DOI: 10.1002/sim.2328.
  • 22
    Hill J, Reiter JP. Interval estimation for treatment effects using propensity score matching. Statistics in Medicine 2006; 25(13):22302256.
  • 23
    Ming K, Rosenbaum PR. Substantial gains in bias reduction from matching with a variable number of controls. Biometrics 2000; 56(1):118124.
  • 24
    Gu XS, Rosenbaum PR. Comparison of multivariate matching methods: structures, distances, and algorithms. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 1993; 2: 405420.
  • 25
    Austin PC. Statistical criteria for selecting the optimal number of untreated subjects matched to each treated subject when using many-to-one matching on the propensity score. American Journal of Epidemiology 2010; 172(9):10921097.