1097-0266/asset/SMJ_left.gif?v=1&s=0d6b7d5b0826e7c6cbdc29281df4411fc6c72458)
1097-0266/asset/SMJ_right.gif?v=1&s=ba55ab6eb3917554fae90dca0fae6a736025dd01)
Research Article
How long must a firm be great to rule out chance? Benchmarking sustained superior performance without being fooled by randomness
Article first published online: 19 NOV 2011
DOI: 10.1002/smj.1943
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Henderson, A. D., Raynor, M. E. and Ahmed, M. (2012), How long must a firm be great to rule out chance? Benchmarking sustained superior performance without being fooled by randomness. Strat. Mgmt. J., 33: 387–406. doi: 10.1002/smj.1943
Publication History
- Issue published online: 3 FEB 2012
- Article first published online: 19 NOV 2011
- Accepted manuscript online: 10 NOV 2011 09:04AM EST
- Manuscript Revised: 2 NOV 2011
- Manuscript Received: 13 JAN 2009
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- sustained superior performance;
- competitive advantage;
- randomness;
- sustained competitive advantage;
- resource-based view
Abstract
Although sustained superior firm performance may arise from skillful management or other valuable, rare, and inimitable resources, it can also result from randomness. Studying U.S. companies from 1965–2008, we benchmark how long a firm must perform at a high level to be confident that it is something other than the outcome of a time-homogeneous stationary Markov chain defined on the state space of percentiles. We find (a) the number of sustained superior performers in Compustat, measured by ROA and Tobin's q, exceeds the number of false positives we would expect to be generated by such a process; yet (b) the occurrence of false positives is often enough to fool many observers, so (c) the identification of sustained superior performers requires particularly stringent benchmarks to enable valid study. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.