SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Acemoglu D, Johnson S. 2005. Unbundling institutions. Journal of Political Economy 113(5): 949995.
  • Allen F, Qian J, Qian M. 2007. Law, finance, and economic growthin China. Journal of Financial Economics 77: 57116.
  • Ang YY. 2010. Dual fiscal incentives: explaining the paradox of developmental states and predatory bureaucracies in local China. In Paper presented at The American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
  • Asian Development Bank. 2003. The Development of Private Enterprise in the People's Republic of China. Asian Development Bank: Manila, Philippines.
  • Bai C-E, Lu J, Tao Z. 2006. Property rights protection and access to bank loans - evidence from private enterprises in China. Economics of Transition 14(4): 611628.
  • Bayliss K. 2002. Privatization and poverty: the distributional impact of utility privatization. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 73: 603625.
  • Baysinger B. 1984. Domain maintenance as an objective of business political activity: an expanded typology. Academy of Management Review 9(2): 248258.
  • Bhagwati JN. 1982. Directly unproductive, profit-seeking (DUP) activities. Journal of Political Economy 90(5): 9881002.
  • Bonardi J-P, Holburn GLF, Vanden Bergh RG. 2006. Nonmarket strategy performance: evidence from U.S. electric utilities. Academy of Management Journal 49(6): 12091228.
  • Brandt L, Rawski TG. 2007. China's great economic transformation. In China's Great Economic Transformation, Brandt L, Rawski TG (eds). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; 229.
  • Campbell-White O, Bhatia A. 1998. Privatization in Africa. World Bank: Washington, DC.
  • Chen J. 1998. Loss of China's Property: An Analysis of the Loss of State-Owned Assets. China City Press: Beijing, China.
  • Chen J, Dickson BJ. 2010. Allies of the State: China's Private Entrepreneurs and Democratic Change. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA and London, UK.
  • Cho YN. 2003. Symbiotic neighbour or extra-court judge? The supervision over courts by Chinese local people's congresses. China Quarterly 176: 10681083.
  • Chong A, López-de-Silanes F. 2003. The Truth about Privatization in Latin America. Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA.
  • Cull R, Xu LC. 2005. Institutions, ownership, and finance: the determinants of profit reinvestment among Chinese firms. Journal of Financial Economics 77(1): 117146.
  • de Figueiredo JM, Tiller EH. 2001. The structure and conduct of corporate lobbying: how firms lobby the Federal Communications Commission. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 10(1): 91122.
  • Deng G, Kennedy S. 2010. Big business and industry association lobbying in China: the paradox of contrasting styles. China Journal 63: 101125.
  • Dickson BJ. 2003. Red Capitalists in China : The Party, Private Entrepreneurs, and Prospects for Political Change. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
  • Dickson BJ. 2008. Wealth into Power: The Communist Party's Embrace of China's Private Sector. Cambridge University Press: New York.
  • DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW. 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48: 147160.
  • Fan G, Wang X. 2000. NERI index of Marketization of China's Provinces 2000 Report. Economics Science Press: Beijing, China.
  • Fan G, Wang X. 2001. NERI index of Marketization of China's Provinces 2001 Report. Economics Science Press: Beijing, China.
  • Fan G, Wang X. 2004. NERI Index of Marketization of China's Provinces 2004 Report. Economics Science Press: Beijing, China.
  • Fan G, Wang X. 2006. NERI Index of Marketization of China's Provinces 2006 Report. Economics Science Press: Beijing, China.
  • Gray V, Lowery D. 1997. Reconceptualizing PAC formation: it's not a collective action problem, and it may be an arm race. American Politics Quarterly 25(3): 319346.
  • Grier KB, Munger MC, Roberts BE. 1994. The determinants of industry political activity, 1978–1986. American Political Science Review 88(4): 911926.
  • Guo G. 2007. Organizational involvement and political participation in China. Comparative Political Studies 40(4): 457482.
  • Hamilton BH, Nickerson JA. 2003. Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organization 1: 5178.
  • Hansen WL, Mitchell NJ. 2000. Disaggregating and explaining corporate political activity: domestic and foreign corporations in national politics. American Political Science Review 94(4): 891903.
  • Hansen WL, Mitchell NJ, Drope JM. 2004. Collective action, pluralism, and the legitimacy tariff: corporate activity or inactivity in politics. Political Research Quarterly 57(3): 421429.
  • Hansen WL, Mitchell NJ, Drope JM. 2005. The logic of private and collective action. American Journal of Political Science 49(1): 150167.
  • Harstad B, Svensson J. 2011. Bribes, lobbying, and development. American Political Science Review 105(1): 4663.
  • Henisz WJ. 2000. The institutional environment for multinational investment. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 16(2): 334364.
  • Henisz WJ, Zelner BA. 2003. The strategic organization of political risks and opportunities. Strategic Organization 1(4): 451460.
  • Henisz WJ, Zelner BA. 2006. Interest groups, veto points, and electricity infrastructure deployment. International Organization 60(1): 263286.
  • Heston A, Sicular T. 2007. China and development economics. In China's Great Economic Transformation, Brandt L, Rawski TG (eds). Cambridge University Press: New York; 2767.
  • Hillman AJ, Hitt MA. 1999. Corporate political strategy formulation: a model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Academy of Management Review 24(4): 825842.
  • Hillman AJ, Zardkoohi A, Bierman L. 1999. Corporate political strategies and firm performance: indications of firm-specific benefits from personal service in the U.S. government. Strategic Management Journal 20(1): 6781.
  • Hoskisson RE, Eden L, Lau CM, Wright M. 2000. Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal 43(3): 249267.
  • International Finance Corporation. 2000. China's Emerging Private Enterprises: Prospects for the New Century. International Finance Corporation: Washington, DC.
  • Jin H, Qian Y, Weingast BR. 2005. Regional decentralization and fiscal incentives: federalism, Chinese style. Journal of Public Economics 89(9–10): 17191742.
  • Kennedy S. 2005. The Business Lobbying in China. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
  • Kennedy S. 2011. Comparing formal and informal lobbying practices in China: the capital's ambivalent embrace of capitalists. China Information XXIII(2): 195222.
  • Kessides C. 1993. The Contributions of Infrastructure to Economic Development: A Review of Experience and Policy Implications. World Bank: Washington, DC.
  • King G, Tomz M, Wittenberg J. 2000. Making the most of statistical analyses: improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science 44(2): 347361.
  • Lau LJ, Qian Y, Roland G. 2000. Reform without losers: an interpretation of China's dual track approach to transition. Journal of Political Economy 108(1): 120143.
  • Lenway SA, Rehbein K. 1991. Leaders, followers, and free riders: an empirical test of variation in corporate political involvement. Academy of Management Journal 34(4): 893905.
  • Li W. 1999. Corruption and resource allocation under China's dual-track system. Available at: http://www.econometricsociety.org/meetings/wc00/pdf/0179.pdf (accessed 6 April 2013).
  • Li H. 2003. Government's budget constraint, competition, and privatization: evidence from China's rural industry. Journal of Comparative Economics 31: 486502.
  • Li H, Meng L, Zhang J. 2006. Why do entrepreneurs enter politics? Evidence from China. Economic Inquiry 44(3): 559578.
  • Li H, Zhang Y. 2007. The role of managers' political networking and functional experience in new venture performance: evidence from China's transition economy. Strategic Management Journal 28: 791804.
  • Lu Y. 2011. Political connections and trade expansion. Economics of Transition 19(2): 231254.
  • Luo Y. 2003. Industrial dynamics and managerial networking in an emerging market: the case of China. Strategic Management Journal 24: 13151327.
  • Ma D, Parish WL. 2006. Tocquevillian moments: charitable contribution by Chinese private entrepreneurs. Social Forces 85(2): 943964.
  • Manion M. 2008. When communist party candidates can lose, who wins? Assessing the role of local people's congresses in the selection of leaders in China. China Quarterly 195: 607630.
  • Megginson WL, Netter JM. 2001. From state to market: a survey of empirical studies on privatization. Journal of Economic Literature 39(2): 321389.
  • Merton RK. 1968. The Matthew effect in science: the reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science 159(318): 5663.
  • Montinola G, Qian Y, Weingast BR. 1996. Federalism, Chinese style: the political basis for economic success. World Politics 48(1): 5081.
  • North DC. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press: New York.
  • North DC, Weingast BR. 1989. Constitutions and commitment: the evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenth-century England. Journal of Economic History 49(4): 803832.
  • Norton EC, Wang H, Ai C. 2004. Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models. Stata Journal 4(2): 154167.
  • Olson M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Schocken: New York.
  • Paler L. 2005. China's legislation law and the making of a more orderly and representative legislative system. China Quarterly 182: 301318.
  • Pearson M. 1994. The janus face of busines associations in China: socialist corporatism in foreign enterprises. Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs 31: 2546.
  • Pearson MM. 1997. China's New Business Elite: The Political Consequences of Economic Reform. University of California Press: Berkeley, CA.
  • Peng Y. 2004. Kinship networks and entrepreneurs in China's transitional economy. American Journal of Sociology 109(5): 10451074.
  • Peng MW, Luo Y. 2000. Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: the nature of a micro–macro link. Academy of Management Journal 43(3): 486501.
  • Potter PB. 1999. The Chinese legal system: continuing commitment to the primacy of state power. China Quarterly 159: 673683.
  • Przeworski A, Vreeland JR. 2002. A statistical model of bilateral cooperation. Political Analysis 10(2): 101112.
  • Salamon LM, Siegfried JJ. 1977. Economic power and political influence: the impact of industry structure on public policy. American Political Science Review 71: 10261043.
  • Schuler DA, Rehbein K, Cramer RD. 2002. Pursuing strategic advantage through political means: a multivariate approach. Academy of Management Journal 45(4): 659672.
  • Shi T. 1999. Voting and nonvoting in China: voting behavior in plebiscitary and limited-choice elections. Journal of Politics 61(4): 11151139.
  • Tsai KS. 2007. Capitalism without Democracy: The Private Sector in Contemporary China. Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY and London, UK.
  • Unger J. 1996. “Bridges”: private business, the Chinese government and the rise of new associations. China Quarterly 147: 795819.
  • Xin KR, Pearce JL. 1996. Guanxi: connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal 39(6): 16411658.
  • Zelner BA. 2009. Using simulation to interpret results from logit, probit, and other nonlinear models. Strategic Management Journal 30(12): 13351348.