Get access

Strategic rationale for responding to extra-jurisdictional regulation: Evidence from firm adoption of renewable power in the US


  • Adam R. Fremeth,

    Corresponding author
    1. Richard Ivey School of Business, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
    • Correspondence:Adam R. Fremeth, Richard Ivey School of Business The University of Western Ontario 1151 Richmond St. N. London, Ontario ON N6A 3K7, Canada.


    Search for more papers by this author
  • J. Myles Shaver

    1. Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S.A.
    Search for more papers by this author


It is well documented that firms respond to regulations in their home jurisdictions. We present hypotheses that firms also respond to regulations in jurisdictions where they do not operate. We examine renewable-power provision in the U.S. electric utility sector between 2001 and 2006, and find that firms adopt more renewable-power generation when their peers (i.e., firms in the same regulatory jurisdiction) face greater renewable-power standards in other jurisdictions. The underlying mechanism is that forward-looking firms assess when extrajurisdictional regulations foreshadow regulatory changes where they operate. Our analyses support this mechanism versus plausible alternatives. We demonstrate firms acting strategically to respond to extrajurisdictional regulations and show that the central conduit motivating this response is the extrajurisdictional footprint of firms operating in the same jurisdiction as a focal firm. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.