SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Aghion P, Fally T, Scarpetta S. 2007. Credit constraints as a barrier to the entry and post-entry growth of firms. Economic Policy 22(52): 731779.
    Direct Link:
  • Almeida H, Campello M, Weisbach MS. 2004. The cash flow sensitivity of cash. Journal of Finance 59: 17771804.
  • Alti A. 2003. How sensitive is investment to cash flow when financing is frictionless? Journal of Finance 58: 707722.
  • Andriof J, Waddock SA. 2002. Unfolding stakeholder engagement. In Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking: Theory, Responsibility, and Engagement, Andriof J, Waddock SA, Husted BW, Rahman SS (eds). Greenleaf Publishing: Sheffield, U.K.; 19-42.
  • Aupperle KE. 1991. The use of forced-choice survey procedures in assessing corporate social orientation. In Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Post JE (ed). JAI Press: Greenwich, CT; 269-280.
  • Aupperle KE, Carroll AB, Hatfield JD. 1985. An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal 28: 446463.
  • Baker M, Stein JC, Wurgler J. 2003. When does the market matter? Stock prices and the investment of equity-dependent firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118: 9691005.
  • Bakke TE, Whited TM. 2010. Which firms follow the market? An analysis of corporate investment decisions. Review of Financial Studies 23(5): 19411980.
  • Baum CF, Schaffer ME, Stillman S. 2003. Instrumental variables and GMM: estimation and testing. Working paper, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA.
  • Becchetti L, Trovato G. 2002. The determinants of growth of small- and medium-sized firms: the role of the availability of external finance. Small Business Economics 19(4): 291306.
  • Beck T, Demirguc-Kunt A, Laeven L, Levine R. 2005. Financial and legal constraints to growth: does firm size matter? Journal of Finance 60(1): 137177.
  • Benabou R, Tirole J. 2010. Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica 77(305): 119.
  • Berman SL, Wicks AC, Kotha S, Jones TM. 1999. Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal 42(5): 488506.
  • Bernanke B, Gertler M. 1989. Agency costs, net worth, and business fluctuations. American Economic Review 79: 1431.
  • Bernanke B, Gertler M. 1990. Financial fragility and economic performance. Quarterly Journal of Economics 105: 97114.
  • Blundell R, Bond S, Devereux M, Schiantarelli F. 1992. Investment and Tobin's Q: evidence from company panel data. Journal of Econometrics 51: 233257.
  • Botosan C. 1997. Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. Accounting Review 72: 323349.
  • Bowman EH, Haire M. 1975. A strategic posture toward corporate social responsibility. California Management Review 18(2): 4958.
  • Brammer S, Millington A. 2008. Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 29(12): 13251343.
  • Cabral L, Mata J. 2003. On the evolution of the firm size distribution: facts and theory. American Economic Review 93: 10751090.
  • Campello M, Graham JR, Harvey CR. 2010. The real effects of financial constraints: evidence from a financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics 97(3): 470487.
  • Carpenter RE, Fazzari SM, Petersen BC. 1998. Financing constraints and inventory investment: a comparative study with high-frequency panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics 80: 513519.
  • Carpenter RE, Petersen B. 2002. Is the growth of small firms constrained by internal finance? Review of Economics and Statistics 84(2): 298309.
  • Chatterji AK, Toffel MW. 2010. How firms respond to being rated. Strategic Management Journal 31(9): 917945.
  • Chen K, Chen Z, Wei K. 2009. Legal protection of investors, corporate governance, and the cost of equity capital. Journal of Corporate Finance 15: 273289.
  • Chevalier JA. 1995. Capital structure and product-market competition: empirical evidence from the supermarket industry. American Economic Review 85: 415435.
  • Choi J, Wang H. 2009. Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 30(8): 895907.
  • Clarkson MBE. 1991. Defining, evaluating, and managing corporate social performance: the stakeholder management model. In Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Post JE (ed). JAI Press: Greenwich, CT; 331-358.
  • Cleary S. 1999. The relationship between firm investment and financial status. Journal of Finance 54: 673692.
  • Clotfelter C. 1985. Federal Tax Policy and Charitable Giving. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL.
  • Cochran PL, Wood RA. 1984. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Academy of Management Journal 27: 4256.
  • Cooley TF, Quadrini V. 2001. Financial markets and firm dynamics. American Economic Review 91: 12861311.
  • Desai MA, Foley CF, Forbes KJ. 2008. Financial constraints and growth: multinational and local firm responses to currency depreciations. Review of Financial Studies 21(6): 28572888.
  • Dhaliwal D, Li OZ, Tsang AH, Yang YG. 2011. Voluntary non-financial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: the case of corporate social responsibility reporting. Accounting Review 86(1): 59100.
  • Dorfman R, Steiner PO. 1954. Optimal advertising and optimal quality. American Economic Review 44(5): 826836.
  • Eccles R, Ioannou I, Serafeim G. 2012. The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, MA.
  • El Ghoul S, Guedhami O, Kwok CCY, Mishra DR. 2011. Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking and Finance 35(9): 23882406.
  • European Commission (Commission of the European Communities). 2001. Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. Green paper, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Faulkender M, Petersen M. 2012. Investment and capital constraints: repatriations under the American Jobs Creation Act. Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
  • Fazzari SM, Hubbard G, Petersen BC. 1988. Finance constraints and corporate investment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1: 141195.
  • Fombrun CJ. 1996. Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
  • Fombrun CJ, Gardberg NA, Barnett ML. 2000. Opportunity platforms and safety nets: corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Business and Society Review 105(1): 85106.
  • Freeman RE. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Perspective. Pitman: Boston, MA.
  • Freeman RE, Harrison JS, Wicks AC. 2007. Managing for Stakeholders: Survival, Reputation, and Success. Yale University Press: New Haven, CT.
  • Freeman RE, Harrison JS, Wicks AC, Parmar BL, de Colle S. 2010. Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Cambridge University Press: New York.
  • Friedberg L. 2003. The impact of technological change on older workers: evidence from data on computers. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 56(3): 511529.
  • Friedman M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 13 September: 122-126.
  • Galaskiewicz J. 1997. An urban grants economy revisited: corporate charitable contributions in the Twin Cities, 1979-81, 1987-89. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(3): 445471.
  • Gardberg NA, Formbrun CJ. 2006. Corporate citizenship: creating intangible assets across institutional environments. Academy of Management Review 31(2): 329346.
  • Gatchev VA, Pulvino T, Tarhan V. 2010. The interdependent and intertemporal nature of financial decisions: an application to cash flow sensitivities. Journal of Finance 65: 725763.
  • Goss A. 2009. Corporate social responsibility and financial distress. In Proceedings of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada Conference. Niagara Falls: Ontario, Canada.
  • Goss A, Roberts GS. 2011. The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking and Finance 35(7): 17941810.
  • Greening DW, Turban DB. 2000. Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business & Society 39(3): 254280.
  • Greenwald B, Stiglitz J, Weiss A. 1984. Information imperfections and macroeconomic fluctuations. American Economic Review 74: 194199.
  • Hadlock JH, Pierce JR. 2010. New evidence on measuring financial constraints: moving beyond the KZ index. Review of Financial Studies 23(5): 19091940.
  • Hail L, Leuz C. 2006. International differences in cost of equity capital: do legal institutions and securities regulations matter? Journal of Accounting Research 44: 485531.
  • Hall BH, Lerner J. 2010. The financing of R&D and innovation. In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Hall BH, Rosenberg N (eds). Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 609-635.
  • Hanlon M, Rajgopal S, Shevlin T. 2003. Are executive stock options associated with future earnings? Journal of Accounting and Economics 36: 343.
  • Hansen L. 1982. Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica 50(3): 10291054.
  • Hawn O, Chatterji A, Mitchell W. 2011. How operational legitimacy conditions the impact of changes in social legitimacy on firm's economic value: the Dow Jones sustainability index addition and deletion. Working paper, Duke University, Durham, NC.
  • Hennessy CA, Whited TM. 2007. How costly is external financing? Evidence from a structural estimation. Journal of Finance 62(4): 17051745.
  • Hillman AJ, Keim GD. 2001. Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal 22(2): 125139.
  • Himmelberg CP, Petersen BC. 1994. R&D and internal finance: a panel study of small firms in high-tech industries. Review of Economics and Statistics 76(1): 3851.
  • Holtz-Eakin D, Joulfaian D, Rosen HS. 1994a. Sticking it out: entrepreneurial survival and liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy 102: 5375.
  • Holtz-Eakin D, Joulfaian D, Rosen HS. 1994b. Entrepreneurial decisions and liquidity constraints. RAND Journal of Economics 25: 334347.
  • Hong HG, Kubik JD, Scheinkman JA. 2011. Financial constraints on corporate goodness. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1734164 (accessed 26 March 2013).
  • Hubbard RG. 1998. Capital-market imperfections and investment. Journal of Economic Literature 36: 193225.
  • Hubbard RG, Kashyap AK. 1992. Internal net worth and the investment process: an application to U.S. agriculture. Journal of Political Economy 100(3): 506534.
  • Hull CE, Rothenberg A. 2008. Firm performance: the interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strategic Management Journal 29(7): 781789.
  • Ioannou I, Serafeim G. 2011. The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1799589 (accessed 26 March 2013).
  • Ioannou I, Serafeim G. 2012. What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies. 43(9): 834864.
  • Ioannou I, Serafeim G. 2013. The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1507874 (accessed 26 March 2013).
  • Jensen MC. 2002. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly 12(2): 235256.
  • Jones TM. 1995. Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review 20: 404437.
  • Kaplan SN, Zingales L. 1997. Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints? Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 169215.
  • Kapstein EB. 2001. The corporate ethics crusade. Foreign Affairs 80(5): 105119.
  • Khurana IK, Raman KK. 2004. Litigation risk and the financial reporting credibility of Big 4 versus non-Big 4 audits: evidence from Anglo-American countries. Accounting Review 79: 473495.
  • Kleibergen F, Paap R. 2006. Generalized reduced rank tests using the singular value decomposition. Journal of Econometrics 133: 97126.
  • Lamont O, Polk C, Saa-Requejo J. 2001. Financial constraints and stock returns. Review of Financial Studies 14(2): 529554.
  • Lee D, Faff R. 2009. Corporate sustainability performance and idiosyncratic risk: a global perspective. Financial Review 44(2): 213237.
  • Lev B, Sougiannis T. 1996. The capitalization, amortization, and value relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics 21: 107138.
  • Levine R. 2005. Finance and growth: theory and evidence. In Handbook of Economic Growth (Vol. 1a), Aghion P, Durlauf S (eds). Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 865-934.
  • Mankiw NG. 2009. Macroeconomics. Worth Publishers: New York.
  • Margolis JD, Elfenbein HA, Walsh JP. 2007. Does it pay to be good? A meta-analysis and redirection of research on the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, MA.
  • Margolis JD, Walsh JP. 2003. Misery loves companies: rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly 48(2): 268305.
  • McGuire JB, Sundgren A, Schneeweis T. 1988. Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal 31(4): 854872.
  • McNichols M. 2002. Discussion of the quality of accruals and earnings: the role of accrual estimation errors. Accounting Review 77(1): 6169.
  • McWilliams A, Siegel D. 1997. The role of money managers in assessing corporate social responsibility research. Journal of Investing 6(4): 98107.
  • McWilliams A, Siegel D. 2000. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal 21(5): 603609.
  • Milgrom P, Roberts J. 1986. Price and advertising signals of product quality. Journal of Political Economy 94(4): 796821.
  • Moskowitz M. 1972. Choosing socially responsible stocks. Business and Society Review 1(1): 7175.
  • Myers S, Majluf N. 1984. Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics 13: 187221.
  • Navarro P. 1988. Why do corporations give to charity? Journal of Business 61(1): 6593.
  • Nevo A. 2000. Mergers with differentiated products: the case of the ready-to-eat cereal industry. RAND Journal of Economics 31(3): 395421.
  • Pagan AR, Hall D. 1983. Diagnostic tests as residual analysis. Econometric Review 2(2): 159218.
  • Preston LE, O'Bannon DP. 1997. The corporate social-financial performance relationship: a typology and analysis. Business and Society 36: 419429.
  • Sen S, Bhattacharya CB. 2001. Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research 38(2): 225243.
  • Sharfman MP. 1996. The construct validity of the Kinder, Lydenberg, and Domini social performance ratings data. Journal of Business Ethics 15(3): 287296.
  • Sharpe SA. 1994. Financial market imperfection, firm leverage, and the cyclicality of employment. American Economic Review 84: 10601074.
  • Simnett R, Vanstraelen A, Chua WF. 2009. Assurance on sustainability reports: an international comparison. Accounting Review 84(3): 937967.
  • Spence M. 1973. Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics 87(3): 355374.
  • Stein J. 2003. Agency, information, and corporate investment. In Handbook of the Economics of Finance, Constantinides G, Harris M, Stulz R (eds). Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 111-166.
  • Summers LH, Bosworth BP, Tobin J, White PM. 1981. Taxation and corporate investment: a Q-theory approach. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1: 67140.
  • Thomson Reuters. 2011. Infostream 3rd Quarter 2011. Available at http://extranet.datastream.com/News_Events/newweb/JulSep_2011/Infostream_Q3_11_v4.pdf (accessed 26 March 2013).
  • Turban DB, Greening DW. 1997. Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal 40(3): 658672.
  • Ullmann AA. 1985. Data in search of a theory: a critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of U.S. firms. Academy of Management Review 10(3): 540557.
  • UN Global Compact-Accenture. 2010. A new era of sustainability. Available at https://microsite.accenture.com/sustainability/research_and_insights/Pages/A-New-Era-of-Sustainability.aspx (accessed 26 March 2013).
  • Waddock AW, Graves SB. 1997. The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal 18(4): 303319.
  • Waldman D, Siegel D, Javidan M. 2006. Components of CEO transformational leadership and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management Studies 43(8): 17031725.
  • Whited TM. 1992. Debt, liquidity constraints, and corporate investment: evidence from panel data. Journal of Finance 47(4): 14251460.
  • Whited TM, Wu G. 2006. Financial constraints risk. Review of Financial Studies 19: 531559.
  • Wokutch RE, McKinney EW. 1991. Behavioral and perceptual measures of corporate social performance. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy: A Research Annual 12: 309330.
  • Wolfe R. 1991. The use of content analysis to assess corporate social responsibility. In Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Post JE (ed). JAI Press: Greenwich, CT; 281-307.
  • Wood DJ, Jones RE. 1995. Stakeholder mismatching: a theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis 3: 229267.
  • Wooldridge J. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.